Reposted: DNA contamination from fetal tissue in vaccines - link to autism

[Guest guest]

Sorry, I had to delete this and repost it modified. It's a general rule on

forums to not post others' names and phrases without expressly getting their

permission and then it's usually done in a less detailed format. Sorry for the

inconvenience to all. I hate to be picky, but just trying to keep everyone

happy. There is good information in here. I love the intelligence in this

group.

Love and prayers,

Heidi N

=====================Begin Post======================================

I started thinking about the fact that autism is 4:1 in boys than girls. Then I

researched whether the fetal tissue used to grow viruses is female or male. I

found out that the Rubella vaccine uses fetal tissue from a female fetus. From

the information posted at this facebook blog it appears to me that the female

DNA is likely the reason that boys are affected more than girls. In case you

don't have a facebook account I have pasted part of the blog below. For the

entire thread please visit the following link

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=75219157496 & topic=15890 & post=117645

http://www.cogforlife.org/congresstestimony.pdf

http://www.cogforlife.org/ratajczakstudy.pdf

http://www.cogforlife.org/ratajczakstudy.pdf

Ummm...no, . Definitely not the conclusion I came away with.

http://www.cogforlife.org/cbsnewsautism.pdf

http://www.cogforlife.org/fetaldnaautism.htm

In the US, over 10 vaccines are manufactured using human

fetal cell lines, and for MMR II and hepatitis A there are not alternatives

available in the US. The

vaccine for chickenpox is also produced using a human fetal cell line, and the

only alternative

anywhere in the world, which some data indicates may be the preferred

alternative, is natural

exposure. Based on the research we have done, perhaps as many as 3% of parents

decline

vaccinations primarily due to the use of human fetal cells in the manufacturing.

The viruses for the

Changepoint

1980.9

Changepoint

1988.4

Changepoint

1995.6

In utero exposure 1979 -1980 1987-1988 1994-1995

Birth to 3 years of age 1980.9-1983.9 1988.4-1991.4 1995.6-1998.64

chickenpox and the hepatitis A vaccines are manufactured in the MRC5 cell line

(Appendices F and H),

which was derived from a normal 3 ½ month male fetus (Appendix J), while the

rubella virus in the

MMR II vaccine is manufactured in the WI-38 cell line (Appendix I), which was

derived from a normal 3

month female fetus (Appendix K).

10. The vaccine-autism controversy is difficult to miss, and simply reading the

published literature should immediately arouse curiosity in a fresh and

objective perspective mind.

Firstly, even in the publications that claim no link between MMR and autism,

there is an evident

changepoint in 1988 (Appendix L figure 2 page 4). The authors dismiss the link

between autism and

the MMR vaccine, because as they point out, vaccine compliance was already well

over 95% in the UK

before 1988. However, what the authors documented (page 4 top right) but failed

to investigate, was

that the MMR vaccine used in the UK was switched in 1988 and 1989. Prior to 1988

the MMR was

produced in animal cell lines, and in 1988 and 1989 three new MMRs were

introduced, all of which use

human fetal cell lines for the production of at least one of the viruses

contained in the MMR (mumps

measles rubella vaccine). Having worked in commercial biotechnology and clinical

development

programs, I was aware of the residuals that would be found in vaccines, and

having also worked with

`homologous recombination' and molecular biology, I was also aware that the

human fetal DNA

introduced in vaccines has the potential to elicit autoimmune responses or to

incorporate into the

recipient's own genes and disrupt normal protein production.

11. Inflection points, change-points, are clear by eye in US autism prevalence

data from the

Department of Education, as well as from the California Department of

Developmental Services. What we have found is that across

continents, and across decades, changepoints in autism disorder (not considering

autism spectrum but

only autism disorder) are clearly associated with the introduction of vaccines

produced using human

fetal cell lines. Each time we inject our children with one of these vaccines,

we are also injecting them

with residual fetal human DNA.

12. US vaccination compliance information was collected by the US Immunization

Surveillance

(USIS) from 1959 through 1985, by the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)

from 1991-to the

present and by the National Immunization Survey (NIS) from 1994 to the present.

No data was

collected for 1986 through 1991, except by retrospective studies after measles

outbreaks had

occurred. The CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report's contain data regarding

measles

immunization coverage that can be used to fill in this 1986 through 1991 gap. I

have already

mentioned that the UK 1988 birthyear changepoint in autism disorder is

associated with the switch

from animal to human fetal produced MMR. In the US, the switch was first

approved in late 1979, and

by 1983, only the human fetal produced MMR II was available in the US (Appendix

T), coinciding with

the 1981 birthyear changepoint for autism. In 1989 a second dose of MMR was

added to the US

vaccination recommendations to be given not less than 28 days after the first

dose. We cannot

determine the significance of this second dose without accessing each child's

immunization record 5

because while it is geared towards 4-6 year olds, the recommendation allows it

28 days after the first

dose, and we know that significant numbers of children (up to 20%; Appendix M

page 2) receive

vaccinations earlier than recommended. More significantly a compliance campaign

was undertaken

after measles outbreaks in 1988 and 1989 that brought compliance with MMR from

as low as 49%, and

perhaps even lower (Appendix N) between 1986 and 1989 (birthyears 1984 to 1987),

to over 82% in

1991 (Birthyear 1989, NHIS). Introduction of a second recommended dose in 1989

and the compliance

campaign correlate with the 1988 calculated autism disorder birth year

changepoint. MMR vaccination

rates increased from birth years 1987 to 1989 by at least 20% and as much as

30-40%, and the

changepoint is calculated to be 1988.4. In 1995 the chickenpox vaccine was

approved in the US and

correlates with the 1995.6 autism disorder birthyear changepoint. The rate of

chickenpox uptake

corresponds to the post 1995.6 birthyear changepoint slope (Appendix E and O).

13. Similar associations between autism disorder changepoints and human fetal

DNA containing

vaccines are evident for Canada, Denmark, Japan, and several South East Asian

countries. The US

Vaccine Safety Database contains data regarding immunizations and autism

disorder for hundreds of

thousands of children, and careful analysis of this data comparing autism rates

prior to 1995 and after

1995, as well as comparing autism disorder prevalence in children vaccinated or

not vaccinated with

the chickenpox vaccine after 1995, will provide significant information about

the potential association

between the use of human fetal cells for vaccine production and autism

prevalence. I also need to say that it is important that independent

groups conduct these types of analyses, and several groups should independently

examine each

question, so that children are finally helped and protected. One of the key

scientists funded by the

CDC to do studies into MMR and autism links, studies used to dismiss the

MMR-autism hypothesis, was

indicted on April 13th this year, 2011, on 13 counts of fraud and 9 counts of

money laundering.

Furthermore, Dr. Thorsen had also already been cited for academic misconduct by

Aarhus University in

Denmark and was charged with embezzling a $1 million grant from the Centers for

Disease Control

(CDC) (Appendix P).

Obviously, a study hasn't been done to prove that there is a link between

vaccines produced with aborted fetal tissue and autism. It would be a hard study

to produce, indeed. However, when you start reading everything that the study

says (not just the conclusion) as well as the work that Theresa Deisher is

doing, it greatly calls into question the safety of these particular vaccines

and if there could possibly be a link. And, to be honest, from my perspective,

(and I have spent HOURS over the past few months looking into this), the

evidence is out there that there is a definite correlation. And all of this

stuff is recent...as in the last few months. I just read about a new book that

was released back in February called " Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed,

Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health,

and Our Children " .

http://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Epidemic-Corporate-Coercive-Government/dp/16160827\

20/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top I'd like to get it as I believe it gives an unbiased

view of exactly what vaccines are and what they can or can't do for us as

individuals and as a nation. Might be worth the read for all of us looking into

this.

As for autism rates in unvaccinated children, it hasn't been done. And I wonder

why? Do you really think the government/pharmaceutical companies want to know?

Do you think they think that perhaps the evidence might destroy their

multi-billion dollar industry? Just asking.

For now...a quote from a recent news release from Theresa Deisher...the PH.D

from Stanford......

" These vaccines are contaminated with human endogenous retrovirus K (HERVK) that

is in the same family as the MMLV virus that induced leukemia in young boys in

gene therapy trials " , noted Dr Deisher. " Additionally, the vaccines contain

significant residual human DNA fragments that can insert themselves into vaccine

recipient cells through a process known as homologous recombination. This

insertion can cause genomic disruption resulting in autism. "

http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/02/unvaccinated-children-madness.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500803_162-4090144-500803.html

Here is one study regarding vaccinated children vs. unvaccinated children. From

what I can tell, it may be the only one and it was a privately funded study.

http://educate-yourself.org/vcd/califoregonunvaccinatedchildrensurvey03nov07.sht\

ml

What I would LOVE to see happen is that we vaccinate SAFELY. And injecting

aborted fetal tissue into my child doesn't really seem safe, especially when the

verdict is still out on its safety:

" " While we have focused primarily on the moral aspects of using aborted fetal

material, the question of that DNA's impact on autism have remained unanswered " ,

she stated. " It is critical that Dr Deisher's work is explored further,

especially since the FDA is well aware of the dangers of extraneous human DNA in

vaccines. "

In the 2008 journal Biologicals, (pg 184-197) FDA scientists stated the danger

of residual DNA in vaccines " has been debated for over 50 years, without

resolution " . Those dangers include cancer, autoimmunity and genomic disruption.*

More startling is the amount of DNA Deisher found in these vaccines. While the

FDA guidelines allow for no more than 10ng per vial, on average the rubella

vaccines contained over 140 ng per vial.

" I would call this a ticking time bomb, except in this case, autism has already

exploded " , stated Vinnedge. " The CDC and FDA need to recognize the importance of

this new evidence and provide real solutions for parents. "

*Citation from the FDA can be found in Science Direct, Biologicals 36 (2008)

184-197 "

If there is way to test babies who may be susceptible to potential dangers of

vaccines BEFORE we vaccinate, why on earth would we not do this? Why won't the

government do studies on the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated? Why haven't they truly

studied any link before now? Will they produce a legitimate study?

What I'm saying in my apparent agenda is research this stuff for yourself before

you decide whether or not to vaccinate. Medical professionals receive their

information on vaccines from the pharmaceutical companies. Companies who have A

LOT to lose if truth about vaccines comes to light.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500803_162-4090144-500803.html

Sun Jun 5, 2011 10:50 am