Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Poll Results

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I don't think it was that obvious. I certainly wasn't aware of that. I

assume all polls are secret ballot unless broadcast otherwise. Others may

have also.

Maybe more people knew about it than I thought which would explain the poor

" voter turn-out " .

Have a GREAT one!

Dennis

At 10:08 AM 12/10/2000, you wrote:

>All of the poll pages indicate the results and votes were public :)

>

> [texasems-L] Poll results

>

>

>I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just curious,

>were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by name?

>If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

>

>Steve Athey

>

>

>

>

>

>eGroups

>Sponsor<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=102308.1038796.2731130.908943/D=egroupmail/S=1700\

061161:N/A=466331/?http://www.yahoo.com>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO! There was no warning and I'm really angry to look on there and see my

email address and vote listed! Not a good thing. I, for one, will

discontinue voting on polls.

Take care, stay safe, and practice mercy, ya'll!! (But don't list my name

and vote in a poll!)

Jana

FW,TX

[texasems-L] Poll results

> I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just

curious,

> were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by

name?

> If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

>

> Steve Athey

>

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It did not state that the votes were public and when the results were posted

as we voted, it was not broken down by who voted for or against what! This

is . . .. ... . . . ok,. . . . .. . .1 . . . . .2 . . . . .3 . . . . .

Take care, stay safe, and practice mercy, ya'll!!

Jana

FW,TX

[texasems-L] Poll results

>

>

> I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just

curious,

> were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by

name?

> If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

>

> Steve Athey

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that we need a re-count of all the votes to make sure they are

right.

:)

wd

[texasems-L] Poll results

> >

> >

> > I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just

> curious,

> > were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by

> name?

> > If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

> >

> > Steve Athey

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want a recount, I voted, fortunately there were

not any butterfly ballots,and i really wanted

some " chad " , but if an appeal is necessary, which

Supreme Court do I appeal too??? LOL Ken

> I think that we need a re-count of all the votes to make sure they are

> right.

>

> :)

>

> wd

> [texasems-L] Poll results

> > >

> > >

> > > I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just

> > curious,

> > > were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by

> > name?

> > > If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

> > >

> > > Steve Athey

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, Jana!

Connie (slowly backing away from the computer...)

--- JL Jordan wrote:

> It did not state that the votes were public and when

> the results were posted

> as we voted, it was not broken down by who voted for

> or against what! This

> is . . .. ... . . . ok,. . . . .. . .1 . . . . .2 .

> . . . .3 . . . . .

> Take care, stay safe, and practice mercy, ya'll!!

> Jana

> FW,TX

>

> [texasems-L] Poll results

> >

> >

> > I admit I didn't participate in any way in the

> poll, but I am just

> curious,

> > were the participants aware that you were going to

> post the results by

> name?

> > If not I would suggest you may have done some of

> them a disservice.

> >

> > Steve Athey

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I probably got more angry than I should have, but . . .. ok, I won't

get angry again! I'm breathing deeply!

Ya'll take care and everyone please accept my apologies for my rants and

raves!

Jana

[texasems-L] Poll results

> > >

> > >

> > > I admit I didn't participate in any way in the

> > poll, but I am just

> > curious,

> > > were the participants aware that you were going to

> > post the results by

> > name?

> > > If not I would suggest you may have done some of

> > them a disservice.

> > >

> > > Steve Athey

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone can go to the egroup and view any poll, it can be set to show the email

or not. Any poll can be viewed only by the person doing the poll or it can

automatically be sent to the egroup. Any poll can be open to anyone or just the

person doing the poll, and various other things. ect;,ect; ect; Also a poll can

have a closing date, be closed at anytime, or stay open for ever. When some one

calls your phone # or sends you an email for a poll you can participate or not.

You would think in the last national election anyone would know that, by now. In

the members area of the egroup you can just list your email, or how much life

insurance you have. I'd like to see some more polls on EMS issues, and anyone

can participate or not. I will with name and email address. I have nothing to

hide.

Ron

[texasems-L] Poll results

I admit I didn't participate in any way in the poll, but I am just curious,

were the participants aware that you were going to post the results by name?

If not I would suggest you may have done some of them a disservice.

Steve Athey

eGroups Sponsor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aw heck...here we go with the " nothing to hide " issue

again!

Ron, I don't mind participating in polls. In fact, I

enjoy it. But I really don't see why everyone's email

has to be posted next to how they voted. Some people

could have some explaining to do at work for their

answers to some of the questions.

If you can set it to where emails don't show, why not

do it that way. You would probably have a better turn

out than if everyone gets " outed " .

Connie

--- wrote:

> Anyone can go to the egroup and view any poll, it

> can be set to show the email or not. Any poll can be

> viewed only by the person doing the poll or it can

> automatically be sent to the egroup. Any poll can be

> open to anyone or just the person doing the poll,

> and various other things. ect;,ect; ect; Also a poll

> can have a closing date, be closed at anytime, or

> stay open for ever. When some one calls your phone #

> or sends you an email for a poll you can participate

> or not.

> You would think in the last national election anyone

> would know that, by now. In the members area of the

> egroup you can just list your email, or how much

> life insurance you have. I'd like to see some more

> polls on EMS issues, and anyone can participate or

> not. I will with name and email address. I have

> nothing to hide.

> Ron

> [texasems-L] Poll results

>

>

> I admit I didn't participate in any way in the

> poll, but I am just curious,

> were the participants aware that you were going to

> post the results by name?

> If not I would suggest you may have done some of

> them a disservice.

>

> Steve Athey

>

>

>

>

>

> eGroups Sponsor

>

>

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'An ol' Mark was nobody's fool!

Dave

Re: [texasems-L] Poll Results

> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:14:40 -0600 " Dave "

> writes:

> >

> > Along the way, they need to prohibit broadcast of exit polls from

> > elections until the polls are closed nation-wide because those are also

> not

> > statistically accurate and have been shown to unduly sway elections.

> >

> >

>

> Proof that Mark Twain was right- " There are three types of lies- lies,

> damn lies and statistics "

>

> " Leadership is action, not position "

> Larry RN CFRN NREMTP

> ...and some other stuff

>

> ________________________________________________________________

> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!

> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!

> Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:

> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...