Guest guest Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Interesting article on today's New York Times website: http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=1\ & sq=caregiving & st=cse From the New Old Age on today's NYT website October 12, 2011 Caregiving's Hidden Benefits By PAULA SPAN Could there be measurable benefits to your health, and to your brain in particular, from being a caregiver? It's practically become an article of faith that the reverse is true, that caring for an elderly relative is so stressful, relentless and draining that it takes a toll on your well-being. Some studies have shown that it can increase your risk of depression and heart disease, impair your immune system, even contribute to death. That caregiving could actually provide some health advantage is so counterintuitive that when Fredman, a Boston University epidemiologist, first saw such results emerging from her study of elderly women, " I thought, what on earth is going on here? " she recalled. " I blamed myself. I thought something was wrong with my data. " But over several years of studying the differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in four locations (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Portland, Ore.), Dr. Fredman and her colleagues found that while caregivers were indeed more stressed, they still had lower mortality rates than non-caregivers over eight years of follow-up. In another study of about 900 women drawn from the same four-site sample, even those classified as high-intensity caregivers — because they performed more functions for their dependent relatives — maintained stronger physical performance than non-caregivers. On tests like walking pace, grip strength and the speed with which they could rise from a chair, the high-intensity group declined less than lower-intensity caregivers or non-caregivers over two years. " That was a shocker, " Dr. Fredman said. Now Dr. Fredman and her co-author nna Bertrand, a health policy associate at Abt Associates in Cambridge, Mass., have gone back to this pool of women to look at their cognitive functioning. Here, again, caregivers did significantly better on memory tests than did non-caregivers followed over two years. Though the groups were about the same average age, in their early to mid-80s, caregivers scored at the level of people who were 10 years younger. Along with what's called " caregiver burden, " gerontologists and psychologists use the phrase " caregiver gain " to reflect the fact that this role, which often exacts such high costs, can bring rewards. But they've typically described those rewards in psychological, emotional and even spiritual terms: growing confidence in one's abilities, feelings of personal satisfaction, increased family closeness. That caregivers can walk faster or recall more words on a memory test — that's news. Dr. Fredman has begun referring to this notion that caregivers are not invariably beaten down by their responsibilities as the " healthy caregiver hypothesis. " Taken together, her studies provide some evidence that caregivers, however stressed, may be stronger and stay stronger than women of the same ages who don't undertake those tasks. The interesting question is why. You can't randomize studies like this, assigning some old women to serve as caregivers but not others. So it's likely that a big part of the differences, Dr. Fredman said, stemmed from self-selection: Women become caregivers because they are healthy enough to shoulder that responsibility. " If you're not healthy, " she said, " it goes to your daughter or daughter-in-law. " It's not surprising, therefore, that even high-intensity caregivers have and maintain more physical strength. It's also true that Dr. Fredman's definition of a caregiver sets a fairly low bar, including anyone who performs even one " instrumental activity of daily living, " such as helping someone with bill-paying or phone use. Hands-on help with bathing or toilet use is clearly more stressful, physically and emotionally; caring for someone with dementia can be particularly arduous. But caregiving itself may provide real benefits. " Most caregiving activities require you to move around a lot, " Dr. Fredman pointed out. " It keeps people on their feet, up and going. " And exercise is known to improve physical health and cognition. Moreover, Dr. Bertrand added: " Caregiving often requires complex thought. Caregivers monitor medications, they juggle schedules, they may take over financial responsibilities. " That, too, can ward off cognitive decline. Plus there's the whole matter of people benefiting from having a purpose. It's hard to quantify, but it's real. So it's fair to say that the question of how caregiving impacts the caregiver is more complicated and individual than we think. Both could be true, the burdens and the benefits, depending on how demanding the job is and a host of other factors. That caregiving is a very tough job is beyond debate. " We don't want to overstate this and say it's good for caregivers and have governors across the country rush to cut support programs that help families, " said Zarit, a Penn State gerontologist who has studied caregiving. (Of course, governors seem all too eager to do that anyway.) Still, " it may not be as predictive of their demise as previously thought, " Dr. Bertrand said of elder care and caregivers. " There are potentially some positive aspects. " .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Norma Great article ! Thanks for sharing !! Judy R. Strauss LMSW PhD Lead Faculty University of Phoenix Jersey City Campus 100 Town Square Place |Jersey City, NJ 07310 Cell- Email- Jrstr@... > > Interesting article on today's New York Times website: > > http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=1\ & sq=caregiving & st=cse > > From the New Old Age on today's NYT website > > October 12, 2011 > > Caregiving's Hidden Benefits > By PAULA SPAN > Could there be measurable benefits to your health, and to your brain in particular, from being a caregiver? > > It's practically become an article of faith that the reverse is true, that caring for an elderly relative is so stressful, relentless and draining that it takes a toll on your well-being. Some studies have shown that it can increase your risk of depression and heart disease, impair your immune system, even contribute to death. > > That caregiving could actually provide some health advantage is so counterintuitive that when Fredman, a Boston University epidemiologist, first saw such results emerging from her study of elderly women, " I thought, what on earth is going on here? " she recalled. " I blamed myself. I thought something was wrong with my data. " > > But over several years of studying the differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in four locations (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Portland, Ore.), Dr. Fredman and her colleagues found that while caregivers were indeed more stressed, they still had lower mortality rates than non-caregivers over eight years of follow-up. > > In another study of about 900 women drawn from the same four-site sample, even those classified as high-intensity caregivers — because they performed more functions for their dependent relatives — maintained stronger physical performance than non-caregivers. On tests like walking pace, grip strength and the speed with which they could rise from a chair, the high-intensity group declined less than lower-intensity caregivers or non-caregivers over two years. > > " That was a shocker, " Dr. Fredman said. > > Now Dr. Fredman and her co-author nna Bertrand, a health policy associate at Abt Associates in Cambridge, Mass., have gone back to this pool of women to look at their cognitive functioning. Here, again, caregivers did significantly better on memory tests than did non-caregivers followed over two years. Though the groups were about the same average age, in their early to mid-80s, caregivers scored at the level of people who were 10 years younger. > > Along with what's called " caregiver burden, " gerontologists and psychologists use the phrase " caregiver gain " to reflect the fact that this role, which often exacts such high costs, can bring rewards. But they've typically described those rewards in psychological, emotional and even spiritual terms: growing confidence in one's abilities, feelings of personal satisfaction, increased family closeness. That caregivers can walk faster or recall more words on a memory test — that's news. > > Dr. Fredman has begun referring to this notion that caregivers are not invariably beaten down by their responsibilities as the " healthy caregiver hypothesis. " Taken together, her studies provide some evidence that caregivers, however stressed, may be stronger and stay stronger than women of the same ages who don't undertake those tasks. The interesting question is why. > > You can't randomize studies like this, assigning some old women to serve as caregivers but not others. So it's likely that a big part of the differences, Dr. Fredman said, stemmed from self-selection: Women become caregivers because they are healthy enough to shoulder that responsibility. " If you're not healthy, " she said, " it goes to your daughter or daughter-in-law. " It's not surprising, therefore, that even high-intensity caregivers have and maintain more physical strength. > > It's also true that Dr. Fredman's definition of a caregiver sets a fairly low bar, including anyone who performs even one " instrumental activity of daily living, " such as helping someone with bill-paying or phone use. Hands-on help with bathing or toilet use is clearly more stressful, physically and emotionally; caring for someone with dementia can be particularly arduous. > > But caregiving itself may provide real benefits. " Most caregiving activities require you to move around a lot, " Dr. Fredman pointed out. " It keeps people on their feet, up and going. " And exercise is known to improve physical health and cognition. > > Moreover, Dr. Bertrand added: " Caregiving often requires complex thought. Caregivers monitor medications, they juggle schedules, they may take over financial responsibilities. " That, too, can ward off cognitive decline. > > Plus there's the whole matter of people benefiting from having a purpose. It's hard to quantify, but it's real. > > So it's fair to say that the question of how caregiving impacts the caregiver is more complicated and individual than we think. Both could be true, the burdens and the benefits, depending on how demanding the job is and a host of other factors. > > That caregiving is a very tough job is beyond debate. " We don't want to overstate this and say it's good for caregivers and have governors across the country rush to cut support programs that help families, " said Zarit, a Penn State gerontologist who has studied caregiving. (Of course, governors seem all too eager to do that anyway.) > > Still, " it may not be as predictive of their demise as previously thought, " Dr. Bertrand said of elder care and caregivers. " There are potentially some positive aspects. " > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 good notion that caregiving is healthy but i don't buy it. i do believe that it is the morally correct thing to do. i am a 61 year old caregiver. i am having more accidents than i normally would: fell 2 feet off a ladder ( almost cracking my hip), got cactus juice in my eye ( got infected), i have to take antidepressents now, my stomach is producing acid all the time ( dr. said take another pill every day), i don't sleep so well, mind is always multi-tasking ( very tiring mentally), i take a tranquilizer every now and then, etc. i would just bet that there are more like me out there.     gary > > Interesting article on today's New York Times website: > > http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=1\ & sq=caregiving & st=cse > > From the New Old Age on today's NYT website > > October 12, 2011 > > Caregiving's Hidden Benefits > By PAULA SPAN > Could there be measurable benefits to your health, and to your brain in particular, from being a caregiver? > > It's practically become an article of faith that the reverse is true, that caring for an elderly relative is so stressful, relentless and draining that it takes a toll on your well-being. Some studies have shown that it can increase your risk of depression and heart disease, impair your immune system, even contribute to death. > > That caregiving could actually provide some health advantage is so counterintuitive that when Fredman, a Boston University epidemiologist, first saw such results emerging from her study of elderly women, " I thought, what on earth is going on here? " she recalled. " I blamed myself. I thought something was wrong with my data. " > > But over several years of studying the differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in four locations (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Portland, Ore.), Dr. Fredman and her colleagues found that while caregivers were indeed more stressed, they still had lower mortality rates than non-caregivers over eight years of follow-up. > > In another study of about 900 women drawn from the same four-site sample, even those classified as high-intensity caregivers — because they performed more functions for their dependent relatives — maintained stronger physical performance than non-caregivers. On tests like walking pace, grip strength and the speed with which they could rise from a chair, the high-intensity group declined less than lower-intensity caregivers or non-caregivers over two years. > > " That was a shocker, " Dr. Fredman said. > > Now Dr. Fredman and her co-author nna Bertrand, a health policy associate at Abt Associates in Cambridge, Mass., have gone back to this pool of women to look at their cognitive functioning. Here, again, caregivers did significantly better on memory tests than did non-caregivers followed over two years. Though the groups were about the same average age, in their early to mid-80s, caregivers scored at the level of people who were 10 years younger. > > Along with what's called " caregiver burden, " gerontologists and psychologists use the phrase " caregiver gain " to reflect the fact that this role, which often exacts such high costs, can bring rewards. But they've typically described those rewards in psychological, emotional and even spiritual terms: growing confidence in one's abilities, feelings of personal satisfaction, increased family closeness. That caregivers can walk faster or recall more words on a memory test — that's news. > > Dr. Fredman has begun referring to this notion that caregivers are not invariably beaten down by their responsibilities as the " healthy caregiver hypothesis. " Taken together, her studies provide some evidence that caregivers, however stressed, may be stronger and stay stronger than women of the same ages who don't undertake those tasks. The interesting question is why. > > You can't randomize studies like this, assigning some old women to serve as caregivers but not others. So it's likely that a big part of the differences, Dr. Fredman said, stemmed from self-selection: Women become caregivers because they are healthy enough to shoulder that responsibility. " If you're not healthy, " she said, " it goes to your daughter or daughter-in-law. " It's not surprising, therefore, that even high-intensity caregivers have and maintain more physical strength. > > It's also true that Dr. Fredman's definition of a caregiver sets a fairly low bar, including anyone who performs even one " instrumental activity of daily living, " such as helping someone with bill-paying or phone use. Hands-on help with bathing or toilet use is clearly more stressful, physically and emotionally; caring for someone with dementia can be particularly arduous. > > But caregiving itself may provide real benefits. " Most caregiving activities require you to move around a lot, " Dr. Fredman pointed out. " It keeps people on their feet, up and going. " And exercise is known to improve physical health and cognition. > > Moreover, Dr. Bertrand added: " Caregiving often requires complex thought. Caregivers monitor medications, they juggle schedules, they may take over financial responsibilities. " That, too, can ward off cognitive decline. > > Plus there's the whole matter of people benefiting from having a purpose. It's hard to quantify, but it's real. > > So it's fair to say that the question of how caregiving impacts the caregiver is more complicated and individual than we think. Both could be true, the burdens and the benefits, depending on how demanding the job is and a host of other factors. > > That caregiving is a very tough job is beyond debate. " We don't want to overstate this and say it's good for caregivers and have governors across the country rush to cut support programs that help families, " said Zarit, a Penn State gerontologist who has studied caregiving. (Of course, governors seem all too eager to do that anyway.) > > Still, " it may not be as predictive of their demise as previously thought, " Dr. Bertrand said of elder care and caregivers. " There are potentially some positive aspects. " > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 I don’t buy it either . Not everyone has a choice - or a clear choice. I sure didn’t but even so I do feel morally bound to do my best. It ground me up so much that we hire people for the physical work, I still must be here for the mental work. There is not anyone but my husband and I. That’s it. No children. No siblings. Nada. We could put her in a medi-cal nursing home. I can’t imagine – or don’t want to imagine. She soils herself constantly. How would she ever be clean? She cannot eat or drink without help, she needs coaching for everything even swallowing, blowing her nose, coughing and spitting phlegm out so it doesn’t choke her (that’s getting dicey!). She thinks her loved ones are on the television and worries if she will ever see them again in the flesh… ghosts with yellow hair come and stay all night… surely they would want to knock her out and keep her quiet and not hear the constant loud serenade of “Help me I want to get up my stomach hurts my leg hurts I need to get up help me please I’m itchy help meeeeeee†all night long? Or the loud conversations with the yellowed-haired obeki (Japanese ghosts)? I’d really like to read the real study and see exactly what their study subjects were and what kind of study it was and what criteria they use to come to these conclusions. Is it only by being alive 8 years later (is that after their loved one died or after their loved one went to a nursing home?), having a strong grip and ability to get up fast and walk briskly? Did the study keep count of how many medical appointments caregivers had, what their health issues are, depression and other things? Was it through some kind of illness like cancer and were any of those who fared so well caregivers for someone with LBD/Parkinson’s through to the end? I am 52. I’m exhausted and run down and stressed. My mind is always multitasking too. The constant troubleshooting is very wearing. I feel like most all of my waking time is triage and problem solving. I sometimes take half a valium to sleep, always have pain and fatigue and prone to getting sick often. Even when I have time to sleep I can’t shut my mind off always. I’ve been fighting a viral infection (maybe shingles) in my ear and nervous system acutely since June (despite the vaccine). My husband and I have so much to do – so much we still want to do and I have to get myself out of a rut every few days wondering if I’m going to survive this and be able to be healthy again. You’re not alone . I sure hope you’re faring better J The thing that keeps me going is I know this is the right thing to do and I am so very glad to be doing it – and I have a huge amount of hope that I will survive and when she is finally at rest and free of this horrible disease, my husband and I will have a time to grieve and heal our lives and that will be a time of renewal. Until then I just keep one foot in front of the other and try to look outside and see the sky each day or take a walk, try to keep some humor alive and well. But hold on -- Maybe the benefit to the brain IS the constant multitasking troubleshooting triaging many of us are having to do??? And I thought it was just giving me a headache! J Dorothy From: LBDcaregivers [mailto:LBDcaregivers ] On Behalf Of gary dale Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:15 PM To: LBDcaregivers Subject: Re: Caregiving's Hidden Benefits good notion that caregiving is healthy but i don't buy it. i do believe that it is the morally correct thing to do. i am a 61 year old caregiver. i am having more accidents than i normally would: fell 2 feet off a ladder ( almost cracking my hip), got cactus juice in my eye ( got infected), i have to take antidepressents now, my stomach is producing acid all the time ( dr. said take another pill every day), i don't sleep so well, mind is always multi-tasking ( very tiring mentally), i take a tranquilizer every now and then, etc. i would just bet that there are more like me out there. gary > > Interesting article on today's New York Times website: > > http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=1 <http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=\ 1 & sq=caregiving & st=cse> & sq=caregiving & st=cse > > From the New Old Age on today's NYT website > > October 12, 2011 > > Caregiving's Hidden Benefits > By PAULA SPAN > Could there be measurable benefits to your health, and to your brain in particular, from being a caregiver? > > It's practically become an article of faith that the reverse is true, that caring for an elderly relative is so stressful, relentless and draining that it takes a toll on your well-being. Some studies have shown that it can increase your risk of depression and heart disease, impair your immune system, even contribute to death. > > That caregiving could actually provide some health advantage is so counterintuitive that when Fredman, a Boston University epidemiologist, first saw such results emerging from her study of elderly women, " I thought, what on earth is going on here? " she recalled. " I blamed myself. I thought something was wrong with my data. " > > But over several years of studying the differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in four locations (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Portland, Ore.), Dr. Fredman and her colleagues found that while caregivers were indeed more stressed, they still had lower mortality rates than non-caregivers over eight years of follow-up. > > In another study of about 900 women drawn from the same four-site sample, even those classified as high-intensity caregivers — because they performed more functions for their dependent relatives — maintained stronger physical performance than non-caregivers. On tests like walking pace, grip strength and the speed with which they could rise from a chair, the high-intensity group declined less than lower-intensity caregivers or non-caregivers over two years. > > " That was a shocker, " Dr. Fredman said. > > Now Dr. Fredman and her co-author nna Bertrand, a health policy associate at Abt Associates in Cambridge, Mass., have gone back to this pool of women to look at their cognitive functioning. Here, again, caregivers did significantly better on memory tests than did non-caregivers followed over two years. Though the groups were about the same average age, in their early to mid-80s, caregivers scored at the level of people who were 10 years younger. > > Along with what's called " caregiver burden, " gerontologists and psychologists use the phrase " caregiver gain " to reflect the fact that this role, which often exacts such high costs, can bring rewards. But they've typically described those rewards in psychological, emotional and even spiritual terms: growing confidence in one's abilities, feelings of personal satisfaction, increased family closeness. That caregivers can walk faster or recall more words on a memory test — that's news. > > Dr. Fredman has begun referring to this notion that caregivers are not invariably beaten down by their responsibilities as the " healthy caregiver hypothesis. " Taken together, her studies provide some evidence that caregivers, however stressed, may be stronger and stay stronger than women of the same ages who don't undertake those tasks. The interesting question is why. > > You can't randomize studies like this, assigning some old women to serve as caregivers but not others. So it's likely that a big part of the differences, Dr. Fredman said, stemmed from self-selection: Women become caregivers because they are healthy enough to shoulder that responsibility. " If you're not healthy, " she said, " it goes to your daughter or daughter-in-law. " It's not surprising, therefore, that even high-intensity caregivers have and maintain more physical strength. > > It's also true that Dr. Fredman's definition of a caregiver sets a fairly low bar, including anyone who performs even one " instrumental activity of daily living, " such as helping someone with bill-paying or phone use. Hands-on help with bathing or toilet use is clearly more stressful, physically and emotionally; caring for someone with dementia can be particularly arduous. > > But caregiving itself may provide real benefits. " Most caregiving activities require you to move around a lot, " Dr. Fredman pointed out. " It keeps people on their feet, up and going. " And exercise is known to improve physical health and cognition. > > Moreover, Dr. Bertrand added: " Caregiving often requires complex thought. Caregivers monitor medications, they juggle schedules, they may take over financial responsibilities. " That, too, can ward off cognitive decline. > > Plus there's the whole matter of people benefiting from having a purpose. It's hard to quantify, but it's real. > > So it's fair to say that the question of how caregiving impacts the caregiver is more complicated and individual than we think. Both could be true, the burdens and the benefits, depending on how demanding the job is and a host of other factors. > > That caregiving is a very tough job is beyond debate. " We don't want to overstate this and say it's good for caregivers and have governors across the country rush to cut support programs that help families, " said Zarit, a Penn State gerontologist who has studied caregiving. (Of course, governors seem all too eager to do that anyway.) > > Still, " it may not be as predictive of their demise as previously thought, " Dr. Bertrand said of elder care and caregivers. " There are potentially some positive aspects. " > > . > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2011 Report Share Posted October 13, 2011 I always question the validity of research that is counterpoint to what I have read and what I have personally experienced. And this research has a bit of a smell to it. I wonder if this one study can be duplicated. There are a lot of studies out there that seem to duplicate the caregiver stress...and suddenly this apple pie in the sky one comes along. Doesn't ring true. Nan > > > > > Interesting article on today's New York Times website: > > > > http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=1 <http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/caregivings-hidden-benefits/?scp=\ 1 & sq=caregiving & st=cse> & sq=caregiving & st=cse > > > > From the New Old Age on today's NYT website > > > > October 12, 2011 > > > > Caregiving's Hidden Benefits > > By PAULA SPAN > > Could there be measurable benefits to your health, and to your brain in particular, from being a caregiver? > > > > It's practically become an article of faith that the reverse is true, that caring for an elderly relative is so stressful, relentless and draining that it takes a toll on your well-being. Some studies have shown that it can increase your risk of depression and heart disease, impair your immune system, even contribute to death. > > > > That caregiving could actually provide some health advantage is so counterintuitive that when Fredman, a Boston University epidemiologist, first saw such results emerging from her study of elderly women, " I thought, what on earth is going on here? " she recalled. " I blamed myself. I thought something was wrong with my data. " > > > > But over several years of studying the differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in four locations (Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis and Portland, Ore.), Dr. Fredman and her colleagues found that while caregivers were indeed more stressed, they still had lower mortality rates than non-caregivers over eight years of follow-up. > > > > In another study of about 900 women drawn from the same four-site sample, even those classified as high-intensity caregivers †" because they performed more functions for their dependent relatives †" maintained stronger physical performance than non-caregivers. On tests like walking pace, grip strength and the speed with which they could rise from a chair, the high-intensity group declined less than lower-intensity caregivers or non-caregivers over two years. > > > > " That was a shocker, " Dr. Fredman said. > > > > Now Dr. Fredman and her co-author nna Bertrand, a health policy associate at Abt Associates in Cambridge, Mass., have gone back to this pool of women to look at their cognitive functioning. Here, again, caregivers did significantly better on memory tests than did non-caregivers followed over two years. Though the groups were about the same average age, in their early to mid-80s, caregivers scored at the level of people who were 10 years younger. > > > > Along with what's called " caregiver burden, " gerontologists and psychologists use the phrase " caregiver gain " to reflect the fact that this role, which often exacts such high costs, can bring rewards. But they've typically described those rewards in psychological, emotional and even spiritual terms: growing confidence in one's abilities, feelings of personal satisfaction, increased family closeness. That caregivers can walk faster or recall more words on a memory test †" that's news. > > > > Dr. Fredman has begun referring to this notion that caregivers are not invariably beaten down by their responsibilities as the " healthy caregiver hypothesis. " Taken together, her studies provide some evidence that caregivers, however stressed, may be stronger and stay stronger than women of the same ages who don't undertake those tasks. The interesting question is why. > > > > You can't randomize studies like this, assigning some old women to serve as caregivers but not others. So it's likely that a big part of the differences, Dr. Fredman said, stemmed from self-selection: Women become caregivers because they are healthy enough to shoulder that responsibility. " If you're not healthy, " she said, " it goes to your daughter or daughter-in-law. " It's not surprising, therefore, that even high-intensity caregivers have and maintain more physical strength. > > > > It's also true that Dr. Fredman's definition of a caregiver sets a fairly low bar, including anyone who performs even one " instrumental activity of daily living, " such as helping someone with bill-paying or phone use. Hands-on help with bathing or toilet use is clearly more stressful, physically and emotionally; caring for someone with dementia can be particularly arduous. > > > > But caregiving itself may provide real benefits. " Most caregiving activities require you to move around a lot, " Dr. Fredman pointed out. " It keeps people on their feet, up and going. " And exercise is known to improve physical health and cognition. > > > > Moreover, Dr. Bertrand added: " Caregiving often requires complex thought. Caregivers monitor medications, they juggle schedules, they may take over financial responsibilities. " That, too, can ward off cognitive decline. > > > > Plus there's the whole matter of people benefiting from having a purpose. It's hard to quantify, but it's real. > > > > So it's fair to say that the question of how caregiving impacts the caregiver is more complicated and individual than we think. Both could be true, the burdens and the benefits, depending on how demanding the job is and a host of other factors. > > > > That caregiving is a very tough job is beyond debate. " We don't want to overstate this and say it's good for caregivers and have governors across the country rush to cut support programs that help families, " said Zarit, a Penn State gerontologist who has studied caregiving. (Of course, governors seem all too eager to do that anyway.) > > > > Still, " it may not be as predictive of their demise as previously thought, " Dr. Bertrand said of elder care and caregivers. " There are potentially some positive aspects. " > > > > . > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.