Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 There seem to be some Monsanto or Cargill or similarly rewarded advocates posting into the Seattle P-I article about toxic food (1). So, yesterday and today I entered the fray. Here are my two comments and a link to the original article. - - - - Posted by *aspergerian <http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/piuser/showuser.asp?username=aspergerian>* at 1/31/08 7:58 a.m. P-I readers can delve into PubMed and find peer-reviewed articles which describe associations between pesticides and various pathologies, including but not limited to Parkinson's, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and autism. Furthermore, data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002, show that organochlorine toxicants are associated with metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and diabetes - even more importantly than the much touted obesity/diabetes connection(eg, http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/reprint/30/3/622 The article's Dr. Lu seems to have provided a " no proof of harm " summary that is far from accurate. Profitably patented molecules such as pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fertilizers are causing pathologies in humans. Numerous peer-reviewed studies make this very clear. Posted by *aspergerian <http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/piuser/showuser.asp?username=aspergerian>* at 1/30/08 6:22 a.m. Two peer-reviewed studies have found associations between autism and pesticides (D'Amelio et al 2005, Windham et al 2007). Other pollutants are also implicated (Palmer RF et al 2006; Windham et al 2006). Inter-individual variation in the ability to detoxify intra-body pesticides has been found to vary by more than 50 times, especially among infants (Furlong CE et al 2006). A ramification is that some individuals are likely to be injured by pesticides - even those at so-called low-doses. However, a methodology likely to find " no harm " exists in many studies, because looking at a single pollutant (eg, one specific pesticide) precludes additive and synergistic effects of numerous pesticides. Not surprisingly, the EPA's stance has become dominated by the politics of protecting investors who profit from pesticide patents, production, and use. In that context, collateral damage to children is acceptable. Some might even refer to pesticide findings as a " non-story " . - - - - 1. [foto] Chensheng Lu, holding an apple from Pike Place Market, studied the pesticide levels in Mercer Island children. In the study, the children ate a variety of conventional produce from area groceries and then switched to organic. Andy / P-I - - - - *Harmful pesticides found in everyday food products* *Mercer Island children tested in yearlong study* By ANDREW SCHNEIDER Wednesday, January 30, 2008 http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/health/349263_pesticide30.html pesticides in foods - chart on url Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.