Guest guest Posted September 22, 2008 Report Share Posted September 22, 2008 , Can you please explain your interpretation of these articles? L From: csb-autism-rx [mailto:csb-autism-rx ] On Behalf Of binstock Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 7:21 PM To: csb-autism-rx Subject: malic AND acid AND aluminum - Limits: Humans malic AND acid AND aluminum Limits: Humans 1: Vaccine. 2002 May 31;20 Suppl 3:S40-3. Elimination of aluminum adjuvants. Hem SL. Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. hem@... <mailto:hem%40pharmacy.purdue.edu> In vitro dissolution experiments although perhaps not at typical body concentrations and temperatures demonstrated that the alpha-hydroxycarboxylic acids present in interstitial fluid (citric acid, lactic acid, and malic acid) are capable of dissolving aluminum-containing adjuvants. Amorphous aluminum phosphate adjuvant dissolved more rapidly than crystalline aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Intramuscular administration in New Zealand White rabbits of aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide adjuvants, which were labelled with 26Al, revealed that 26Al was present in the first blood sample (1 h) for both adjuvants. The area under the blood level curve for 28 days indicated that three times more aluminum was absorbed from aluminum phosphate adjuvant than aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. In vivo studies using 26Al-labelled adjuvants are relatively safe because accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) can quantify quantities of 26Al as small as 10(-17) g. A similar study in humans would require a whole-body exposure of 0.7 microSv per year compared to the natural background exposure of 3000 microSv per year. The in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption studies indicate that aluminum-containing adjuvants which are administered intramuscularly are dissolved by alpha-hydroxycarboxylic acids in interstitial fluid, absorbed into the blood, distributed to tissues, and eliminated in the urine. PMID: 12184363 2: J Inorg Biochem. 2001 Jun;85(2-3):143-54. Aluminum speciation studies in biological fluids. Part 7. A quantitative investigation of aluminum(III)-malate complex equilibria and their potential implications for aluminum metabolism and toxicity. Venturini-Soriano M, Berthon G. Equipe de Chimie Bioinorganique Médicale, ICMPS-CNRS FR1744, Université Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne (Bât. 3SC), 31062 Toulouse, France. As a nonessential element, aluminum may be toxic at both environmental and therapeutic levels, depending on ligand interactions. Dietary acids that normally occur in fruits and vegetables and commonly serve as taste enhancers are good ligands of the Al(3+) ion. Malic acid is one of these and also one of the most predominant in food and beverages. The present paper reports an examination of its potential influence on aluminum bioavailability through speciation calculations based on Al(III)-malate complex formation constants especially determined for physiological conditions. According to the results obtained, malate appears to be extremely effective in maintaining Al(OH)(3) soluble over the whole pH range of the small intestine under normal dietary conditions. In addition, two neutral Al(III)--malate complexes are formed whose percentages are maximum from very low malate levels. When aluminum is administered therapeutically as its trihydroxide, the amount of metal neutralized by malate peaks as its solubility pH range regresses to its original limits in the absence of malate. The enhancing effect of malate towards aluminum absorption is therefore virtually independent of the aluminum level in the gastrointestinal tract. The presence of phosphate in the gastrointestinal juice is expected to limit the potential influence of malate on aluminum absorption. Under normal dietary conditions, phosphate effectively reduces the fraction of aluminum neutralized by malate but without nullifying it. Aluminum phosphate is predicted to precipitate when aluminum levels are raised as with the administration of aluminum hydroxide, but a significant amount of neutral aluminum malate still remains in solution. Even therapeutic aluminum phosphate is not totally safe in the presence of malate, even at low malate concentrations. As plasma simulations predict that no compensatory effect in favor of aluminum excretion may be expected from malate, simultaneous ingestion of malic acid with any therapeutic aluminum salt should preferably be avoided. PMID: 11410234 3: J Am Coll Nutr. 1992 Jun;11(3):340-8. Why aluminum phosphate is less toxic than aluminum hydroxide. Berthon G, Daydé S. Inserm U305, Equipe Bioréactifs: Spéciation et Biodisponibilité, Université Sabatier, Toulouse, France. Initially characterized in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis, toxic effects due to high aluminum (Al) body loads were subsequently observed in a number of conditions, in particular following ingestion of Al-containing antacids. Among compounds of this class, aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) was recognized as safer than aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3), which was thought to result from its lower solubility and thus absorption in the gastrointestinal (gi) tract. However, while virtually insoluble at acid pH, AlPO4 is more soluble than Al(OH)3 under alkaline conditions, leading to the hypothesis that Al is predominantly absorbed in the acidic region of the gi tract. Our present results suggest otherwise. Al bioavailability depends on the solubility of the salt ingested as well as on the physicochemical properties of the Al soluble complexes formed in the gi fluid. Anions of dietary acids may indeed dissolve significant fractions of Al salts and form absorbable Al complexes. It is in these terms that the well documented increase of Al gi absorption by citrate has been interpreted from computer-based speciation studies. Using similar calculations, we now demonstrate that a series of dietary acids (namely malic, oxalic, tartaric, succinic, aspartic and glutamic acids) can also dissolve significant amounts of Al(OH)3 and form Al neutral complexes available to the gi membrane. In contrast, both effects are far less apparent when Al is administered as AlPO4. We conclude from this observation that the lower toxicity of AlPO4 vs Al(OH)3 stems from its better capacity to resist dissolution and neutral complex formation in the presence of acids commonly present in food. Publication Types: * Comparative Study * Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't * Review PMID: 1619187 4: Food Addit Contam. 1990;7 Suppl 1:S155-7. Potential toxicity of presumably insoluble aluminum salts in presence of common dietary acids. Dayde S, Berthon G. INSERM U305, Université Sabatier, Toulouse, France. It has recently been shown that aluminum absorption may occur following the administration of oral aluminium-containing phosphate-binders and antacids. Computer simulations based on relevant aluminium complex equilibria have been used in the present work to investigate the potential influence of the simultaneous ingestion of common dietary acids on this phenomenon. It results from these studies that aluminium absorption may be favoured to various extents in the presence of citric, malic, oxalic, succinic and tartric acids. PMID: 2262026 5: J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1989;27(6):355-67. The use of chelating agents in the treatment of aluminum overload. Domingo JL. Laboratory of Toxicology and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Reus, Spain. Desferrioxamine (DFO), traditionally used as an iron chelator has been shown to increase urinary aluminum output in humans and aluminum-loaded mice, rats and rabbits. However, major side-effects of DFO treatment have been observed and the drug may accumulate in dialysis patients receiving repeated doses. In recent years, it has been reported that some dicarboxylic or tricarboxylic acids such as succinic, malic or citric may be considered as possible alternatives to DFO in the management of aluminum accumulation. Ethylene-di-(o-hydroxyphenylacetic acid)-like compounds may also have potential as alternatives to DFO in the treatment of aluminum accumulation and aluminum-induced toxicity. Investigation of new therapeutic agents with lower toxicity than DFO and clinical advantages in administration and cost is clearly encouraged. Publication Types: * Review PMID: 2697761 <?> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2008 Report Share Posted September 25, 2008 , If I had the whole-text of each article, I'd attempt an interpretation. Given only abstracts, I'm standing amid a great cloud of unknowing. The malic acid issue you identfied remains important. I posed the question to a list of clinicians and researchers. Thus far, no one has responded. Re: malic AND acid AND aluminum - Limits: Humans Posted by: " john leon " jjleon1@... Date: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:17 pm ((PDT)) , Can you please explain your interpretation of these articles? L <?> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.