Guest guest Posted August 13, 2012 Report Share Posted August 13, 2012 I have never heard of anyone ONLY have Lyme cysts, there is actually no why of knowing this.... NOBODY knows how many spiro's encyst, how many don't... Jim > > > > Subject: F-SCAM ! > To: Lyme_and_Rife > Date: Saturday, August 11, 2012, 8:57 AM > > > > Â > > > > So sorry - but imo, anyone who gets a report from a practitioner, such as the following, beware: > > " Ok had fscaned done results are I have . . . Lyme only in > cyst but lots a cysts,and . . . asked if Lyme could cause symptoms > in cyst form said yes cause its in the nerve ending. " > > IMO - Rubbish. Total Rubbish. > > Red flags: > > 1. Lyme cysts do NOT produce symptoms. This is a FACT that is understood in the Lyme research community. Cysts are dormant, as proven via in vitro research on the various morphs of Lyme at two leading universities: Stony Brook and New Haven (and elsewhere). There is much scientific evidence on this subject - anyone interested can do a google search and come up with a lot of corroboration. > > 2. Also - how in the world does that practitioner know where cysts are located in the body? No way. I am in serious doubt that the F-Scan has a program that can detect just EXACTLY WHERE Lyme cysts are located. They can literally be ANYWHERE in the body. > > 3. This patient just recently herxed VERY STRONGLY at 432 Hz. using the coil machine, absolutely indicating ACTIVE Lyme in spirochete form. Cysts and L-forms do not respond to 432 Hz., as they have NO CELL WALL, and CANNOT be affected by rife, as is currently understood by the rife community. > > No one has a frequency for cyts and L-forms that is proven to work (they don't!), though the CAFL does list some. That does not mean they are effective. The CAFL is NOT the last word on frequencies. If one reads just how frequencies on the CAFL were compiled (from anyone, anywhere who reported results), it can be ascertained that this method is totally arbitrary and non-scientific. Some of the frequencies on the CAFL do work, some are just a lot of nonsense. > > What I have found, in the case of Lyme, is that many of the frequencies listed for it on the CAFL, may actually work for the coinfections. As Lymies have many infections at once, therein lies the confusion. > > There are biofeedback devices that can truly work to diagnose disease. One area of this growing field, is referred to as electrodermal screening, or " EDS " . It incorporates devices utilizing the galvanic skin response for diagnosis. > > The following are a couple of links I have in my files describing this modality and devices associated with it: > > http://www.healthy.net/scr/article.aspx?Id=1086 > > http://www.oirf.com/index.html > > BTW - I have excellent reports on the MORA device for detecting disease from a number of sources. To find a practitioner: contact info, possibly leading to referrals, is provcided on the above website. > > - Jane > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.