Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 Maybe, but that’s not what the article says!! And that statement is repeated again and again all in the name of scaring the men with a prostate cancer diagnosis. If 288,000 men died of cancer in the USA, as the statistics show, then prostate cancer is not one of the biggest cancer risks facing men in the USA with an estimated toll of “only” 28,000 plus minus. PCa coming in as cause of death #7 isn’t as frightening as #2. All the best Terry Herbert I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in ‘96: and have learned a bit since then. My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za Dr “Snuffy” Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data " From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of APilgrm@... Sent: Sunday, 13 January 2008 2:28 PM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Re: Symptoms and Symptom Distress in Localized Prosta... Hi Terry, I think the statistic is that PCa is the second leading cause of death in men due to cancer. I wish you all the best Aubrey In a message dated 1/12/2008 5:14:09 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, ghenesh_49optusnet.au writes: Is this statement correct? <snip> Prostate cancer is .......... the second leading cause of death in American men. <snip> The latest US statistic I can find show that - 1,2 million men died - 336,000 men died of disease of the heart - 288,000 men (24.0%) died of malignant neoplasms (so if the death toll from prostate cancer is around 28,000, that means that 10% of the cancer deaths, or about 2.5% of total male deaths were from prostate cancer) - 70,000 died in accidents - 61,500 died from cerebrovascular disease - 61,000 died from chronic lower respiratory disease - 35,438 died from Diabetes - 28,778 died from influenza and pneumonia On the basis of these figures, prostate cancer is certainly not the second leading cause of death in American men who have about the same chance of dying from influenza - yet men when diagnosed with 'flu simply don't have the same reaction as men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Could that be because they are constantly fed the incorrect information? All the best Terry Herbert I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in ‘96: and have learned a bit since then. My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za Dr “Snuffy” Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data " Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 Though it is more likely in these current days with more modern techniques and methods of diagnosing and treating prostate cancer that at the age men are diagnosed they are unlikely to die any sooner than other men their age, I am inclined to believe that even 10% of men so diagnosed dying of our insidious disease is still too many and we have to continue our efforts in making men aware of prostate cancer and in encouraging support of more federal funds dedicated to prostate cancer research. There, I wrote that all in one breath and in one sentence. My opinion. (Chuck) Maack Prostate Cancer Advocate Wichita, Kansas Chapter, Us TOO Bio: http://www.ustoowichita.org/leaders.cfm?content=bio & id=1 Email: maack1@... > > Maybe, but that's not what the article says!! And that statement is repeated > again and again all in the name of scaring the men with a prostate cancer > diagnosis. > > > > If 288,000 men died of cancer in the USA, as the statistics show, then > prostate cancer is not one of the biggest cancer risks facing men in the USA > with an estimated toll of " only " 28,000 plus minus. > > > > PCa coming in as cause of death #7 isn't as frightening as #2. > > > > All the best > > > > Terry Herbert > > I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in '96: and have > learned a bit since then. > > My sites are at www.yananow.net <http://www.yananow.net/> and > <http://www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za/> > www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za > > Dr " Snuffy " Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most > of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with > inadequate data " > > > > _____ > > From: ProstateCancerSupport > [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of APilgrm@... > Sent: Sunday, 13 January 2008 2:28 PM > To: ProstateCancerSupport > Subject: Re: Symptoms and Symptom Distress in > Localized Prosta... > > > > Hi Terry, > > > > I think the statistic is that PCa is the second leading cause > > of death in men due to cancer. > > > > I wish you all the best > > Aubrey > > > > In a message dated 1/12/2008 5:14:09 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > ghenesh_49@... writes: > > Is this statement correct? <snip> Prostate cancer is .......... the second > leading cause of death in American men. <snip> > > The latest US statistic I can find show that > > - 1,2 million men died > > - 336,000 men died of disease of the heart > > - 288,000 men (24.0%) died of malignant neoplasms (so if the death toll from > prostate cancer is around 28,000, that means that 10% of the cancer deaths, > or about 2.5% of total male deaths were from prostate cancer) > > - 70,000 died in accidents > > - 61,500 died from cerebrovascular disease > > - 61,000 died from chronic lower respiratory disease > > - 35,438 died from Diabetes > > - 28,778 died from influenza and pneumonia > > On the basis of these figures, prostate cancer is certainly not the second > leading cause of death in American men who have about the same chance of > dying from influenza - yet men when diagnosed with 'flu simply don't have > the same reaction as men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Could that be > because they are constantly fed the incorrect information? > > All the best > > Terry Herbert > > I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in '96: and have > learned a bit since then. > > My sites are at www.yananow. <http://www.yananow.net/> net and > www.prostatecancerw <http://www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za/> > atchfulwaiting.co.za > > Dr " Snuffy " Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most > of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with > inadequate data " > > > > > > _____ > > Start the year off right. Easy > <http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise? NCID=aolcmp00300000002489> > ways to stay in shape in the new year. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 I don't disagree with your sentiments, Chuck, but is it good practice to mislead men? Surely if they find out that what they have been told about this is plain wrong, then there is a whole lot of other stuff they may not believe either? All the best Terry Herbert I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in ‘96: and have learned a bit since then. My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za Dr “Snuffy” Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data " From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of maack1wichita Sent: Sunday, 13 January 2008 3:45 PM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: Re: Symptoms and Symptom Distress in Localized Prosta... Though it is more likely in these current days with more modern techniques and methods of diagnosing and treating prostate cancer that at the age men are diagnosed they are unlikely to die any sooner than other men their age, I am inclined to believe that even 10% of men so diagnosed dying of our insidious disease is still too many and we have to continue our efforts in making men aware of prostate cancer and in encouraging support of more federal funds dedicated to prostate cancer research. There, I wrote that all in one breath and in one sentence. My opinion. (Chuck) Maack Prostate Cancer Advocate Wichita, Kansas Chapter, Us TOO Bio: http://www.ustoowichita.org/leaders.cfm?content=bio & id=1 Email: maack1@... > > Maybe, but that's not what the article says!! And that statement is repeated > again and again all in the name of scaring the men with a prostate cancer > diagnosis. > > > > If 288,000 men died of cancer in the USA, as the statistics show, then > prostate cancer is not one of the biggest cancer risks facing men in the USA > with an estimated toll of " only " 28,000 plus minus. > > > > PCa coming in as cause of death #7 isn't as frightening as #2. > > > > All the best > > > > Terry Herbert > > I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in '96: and have > learned a bit since then. > > My sites are at www.yananow.net <http://www.yananow.net/> and > <http://www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za/> > www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za > > Dr " Snuffy " Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most > of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with > inadequate data " > > > > _____ > > From: ProstateCancerSupport > [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of APilgrm@... > Sent: Sunday, 13 January 2008 2:28 PM > To: ProstateCancerSupport > Subject: Re: Symptoms and Symptom Distress in > Localized Prosta... > > > > Hi Terry, > > > > I think the statistic is that PCa is the second leading cause > > of death in men due to cancer. > > > > I wish you all the best > > Aubrey > > > > In a message dated 1/12/2008 5:14:09 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > ghenesh_49@... writes: > > Is this statement correct? <snip> Prostate cancer is .......... the second > leading cause of death in American men. <snip> > > The latest US statistic I can find show that > > - 1,2 million men died > > - 336,000 men died of disease of the heart > > - 288,000 men (24.0%) died of malignant neoplasms (so if the death toll from > prostate cancer is around 28,000, that means that 10% of the cancer deaths, > or about 2.5% of total male deaths were from prostate cancer) > > - 70,000 died in accidents > > - 61,500 died from cerebrovascular disease > > - 61,000 died from chronic lower respiratory disease > > - 35,438 died from Diabetes > > - 28,778 died from influenza and pneumonia > > On the basis of these figures, prostate cancer is certainly not the second > leading cause of death in American men who have about the same chance of > dying from influenza - yet men when diagnosed with 'flu simply don't have > the same reaction as men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Could that be > because they are constantly fed the incorrect information? > > All the best > > Terry Herbert > > I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in '96: and have > learned a bit since then. > > My sites are at www.yananow. <http://www.yananow.net/> net and > www.prostatecancerw <http://www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za/> > atchfulwaiting.co.za > > Dr " Snuffy " Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most > of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with > inadequate data " > > > > > > _____ > > Start the year off right. Easy > <http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise? NCID=aolcmp00300000002489> > ways to stay in shape in the new year. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Here is what the ACS says: " What Are the Key Statistics About Prostate Cancer? Prostate cancer is the most common cancer, other than skin cancers, in American men. The American Cancer Society estimates that during 2007 about 218,890 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in the United States. About 1 man in 6 will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime, but only 1 man in 35 will die of it. More than 2 million men in the United States who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer at some point are still alive today. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men, behind only lung cancer. The American Cancer Society estimates that 27,050 men in the United States will die of prostate cancer in 2007. Prostate cancer accounts for about 9% of cancer- related deaths in men.... " Fuller > > I don't disagree with your sentiments, Chuck, but is it good practice to > mislead men? Surely if they find out that what they have been told about > this is plain wrong, then there is a whole lot of other stuff they may not > believe either? > > > > > > All the best > > > > Terry Herbert > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Terry, It seems to me that this is an typo/editing error rather than an attempt to mislead. It is not even relevant to the topic of the article just part of the introduction. It does not change the conclusions of the article. Kathy On Behalf Of Terry Herbert Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 11:54 PM I don't disagree with your sentiments, Chuck, but is it good practice to mislead men? Surely if they find out that what they have been told about this is plain wrong, then there is a whole lot of other stuff they may not believe either? All the best Terry Herbert I have no medical qualifications but I was diagnosed in ‘96: and have learned a bit since then. My sites are at www.yananow.net and www.prostatecancerwatchfulwaiting.co.za Dr “Snuffy” Myers : " As a physician, I am painfully aware that most of the decisions we make with regard to prostate cancer are made with inadequate data " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Good morning Fuller & all the rest: Just want to say about what I had to say the other night. When I was diagnoised over three years ago maybe longer it never fazed me. My grown children were there asking questions. It is well to have some extra ears around to listen as the options are explained. I actually believe inmy mind that if the cancer is left alone I will be alright, but do I want to take that chance. Like I mentioned the involvement is 20% up from 5% over the past three years. I have had talks with Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Medical Facility. I have studied the deVinci' method which my Urologist is using, and has been using over the last 200 operations. It (operation) has not hit home until now. > > > > I don't disagree with your sentiments, Chuck, but is it good > practice to > > mislead men? Surely if they find out that what they have been told > about > > this is plain wrong, then there is a whole lot of other stuff they > may not > > believe either? > > > > > > > > > > > > All the best > > > > > > > > Terry Herbert > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 > Terry, > It seems to me that this is an typo/editing error rather than an attempt > to mislead. > > It is not even relevant to the topic of the article just part of the > introduction. It does not change the conclusions of the article. Which was a response to Terry's post: > I don't disagree with your sentiments, Chuck, but is it good practice to > mislead men? Surely if they find out that what they have been told about > this is plain wrong, then there is a whole lot of other stuff they may > not believe either? What is the topic of this exchange? It would be very helpful if folks (not picking on Kathy, who is an angel) would puh-leeze cite whatever it is to which they are responding. TIA. Regards, Steve J Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.