Guest guest Posted January 31, 2008 Report Share Posted January 31, 2008 > > Does anyone have any thoughts on Proton Therapy for primary PCA > treatment. Is it currently available anywhere other then California? > What would be the advantages compared to other types of radiation. > > Thanks for any comments. , this is part of an email I sent to another wife whose husband is being treated with IMRT. She was wondering about the difference between protons and IMRT. She said that I did a good job of explaining it, so I thought that this might be helpful. We heard recently that proton treatment at Mass. General in Boston is being reserved for other types of cancer due to the limitations on numbers of people who can be treated. They are promoting their IMRT treatments for prostate. It is kind of a party line, if you get my drift. " Loma started treating prostate cancer with protons in 1991. It has been around since the 1940's mostly in research settings though. There have been long term studies recently about protons, just not very many, since the numbers of men treated are so much lower, I guess. Just last summer some of the proton pioneers published a 15 year study. I believe, based on weeks of research and talking to many men treated with protons, that IMRT has as good a cure rate as protons. If protons had not been available we would have gone with IMRT. The basic differences between the 2 radiations are pretty simple to understand once one has a some idea of how radiation works in the first place. Photons (IMRT) do not have mass. They enter the body at their highest rate of energy. As they pass through the body they damage healthy cells as they collide with them. The collision creates a scatter effect. As they travel through the body they lose energy. After hitting the target they continue on through the body. Protons do have mass and are heavy. They do not harm the healthy cells as they move through the body and there is no scatter. Protons enter the body with a low rate of energy. They rapidly rise to their peak energy just before they hit the target. This is know as the Bragg Peak. You can Google Bragg Peak protons. After the target has been hit the energy drops to near nothing. There is virtually no exit dose. We figured that with less healthy tissue being damaged there would be less risk of side effects, not necessarily a higher cure rate. " , If you have more questions about protons feel free to email me at my AOL address. I can answer most questions or steer you in the direction of someone who can. Gregg completed his 9 weeks of treatment in Loma a year ago this March. The ONLY side effect he has is a decreased amount of semen at orgasm. The treatment itself was very easy to get through. Gregg just turned 59. His gleason score was 3+3, pre-treatment PSA was 4.9. Two cores positive, stage T1c. The diagnostic numbers are important as is a man's age, sexual function and overall health. Laurel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.