Re: Re: FLUSH #3 RESULTS...

[Guest guest]

Hi Barry,

Here is Dale's post explaining laying on left/right sides. I thought

his explaination for laying on left side seemed logical, and worth a

try for calcified stones:

" Perhaps I can help you to understand this better. If you take note of

the position of the gallbladder, in the area just below the liver, it's

neck is notably facing towards the left side. Since the gallstones do

float it is more likely to place the stones at the neck of the

gallbladder if someone is laying on the right side having the left side

up and therefore the neck of the gallbladder up too. This then

facilitates the stones departure into the Common Bile duct with greater

ease. .....At least that is the theory. Therefore if someone has a

calcified stone, which is heavier than a cholesterol stone, then it

would only make more sense to lay on the left side. Thereby there is an

attempt to try get the stone in the neck of the gallbladder to have it

displace into the Common Bile duct when the gallbladder convulses. "

http://www.umm.edu/liver/liver.htm

Adrienne

__________________________________________________

[Guest guest]

<<I still haven't heard anyone explain why Dr. Hulga suggest

laying flat on back and Dr. and others suggest right side>>

Barry, I talked to Chang one day for a long time and we talked about

the positioning. She just said that lying on the right side wasn't a proven

thing. I always would lie on my back with my head up high. laura

----- Original Message -----

From: " barry91162 " <barry91162@...>

<gallstones >

Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 6:48 PM

Subject: Re: FLUSH #3 RESULTS...

> Thanks Adrienne,

>

> I may wait one month now to do my fourth flush. Maybe I'm clear of

> liver stones. I still want to break that calcified 1cm stone in my GB

> down and eliminate it.

>

> I still haven't heard anyone explain why Dr. Hulga suggest

> laying flat on back and Dr. and others suggest right side. I

> have done both with the same liver stone elimination results (1st and

> 2nd cleanses about the same). Why the differance in method? Does

> anyone know why they differ? (Not the reasoning for how the stones

> pass but why they differ?..).

>

> Thanks,

> Barry.

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > > Hi GB groupies,

> > >

> > > I've just completed my third flush and feel somewhat

> disappointed.

> > >

> > > #1 flush. A lot of sludge and around 30 stones measuring 1 mm to

> 1 cm

> > >

> > > in size.

> > >

> > > #2 flush. Still a lot of sludge only less and around 70 stones

> same

> > > sizes.

> > >

> > > #3 flush. Only a little sludge and around 50 tiny crystally

> stones

> > > none measuring more than 1 mm.

> > >

> > > I guess my questions would be either I did something wrong with

> my

> > > diet and flush or I've cleared out my liver/gb already.

> > > Am I a third flsuh wonder? I hope so. I was just expecting to get

> the

> > >

> > > same (or more) from my third flush. I'm starting to like seeing

> the

> > > results. haha

> > > I hope my system is clear. I've heard that the bigger stones are

> in

> > > the back and as you continue with flushing the bigger ones come

> out.

> > > Also, I have heard that once the gunk and stones stop you have

> > > probably cleared out your system.

> > > Should I wait 2 weeks and do a 4th cleanse or should I wait a

> month

> > > to do the next one?

> > > Anyone?

> > >

> > > Thanks,

> > > Barry.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> >