Re: Re: Kendra and Group

[Guest guest]

I wasn't referring to implanted women who have gotten sick. My point was

that if implants were removed and replaced at scheduled intervals, women MAY

stay healthy longer. In no way am I promoting implants. Women are going to

choose to implant, health risks or not. By removing them every few years,

one would hopefully remove and replace them before they rupture. Women who

react to the composition of implants obviously would not be helped by

scheduled replacement.

Kenda

> Kenda,

> Anyone who has had implants and then had them explanted and been sick

> from them like we have and LIED TO by ps like we have would know they

> would never have them again. You didn't actually have implants and go

> throught he whole explant as I recall did you? I know you to be very

> compassionate towards what we go through, But thousands of my

> silicone sisters were maimed and yes lied to and then talked about as

> if we were the liers. Anyone who has actually been through all the

> surguries and illness that are children and we have been through

> would never even question havening them all over again, In my opinion.

>

>

>

>

>>

>> I wouldn't want to have surgery every three to five years but if

> one really

>> loved their implants they might be willing.

>>

>> Kenda

>>

>>> My chest felt like a brick immediately

>>> after implantation, I was sick from day one

>>>

>>> I wouldn't want to be cut open every 3-5 years

>>> Would you ??

>>>

>>> Sandy~

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> What strikes me as odd is that if the plastic surgeons

>>> would remove implants before they rupture or leak,

>>> it would generate more business for them.

>>>

>>> I'm shocked that they haven't developed a time line,

>>> like remove and replace them every 3 to 5 years.

>>> Women might be healthy longer and the

>>> docs would be even wealthier.

>>>

>>> Kenda

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>

>