Re: At last, a good article about the FDA's approval of toxic bags!

[Guest guest]

That is the sanest article on this subject that I have read since the reapproval. It's sad that so much evidence exists showing how this device poses grave health and safety risks, with the potential to impact millions of women-- and yet it didn't make a bit of difference in the FDA decision. It feels as though the Dark Ages are coming back, but this time it's the corporations that everyone is worshipping, while science is thrown by the wayside.

Bindi

At last, a good article about the FDA's approval of toxic bags!

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=57075 & nfid=rssfeeds

[Guest guest]

You are right! This is an excellent article. Bravo to medicalnewstoday.

What concerns me is that this approval will put a pall on what already was

non-existant

research on systemic effects. I do believe that many women do not seem to be

affected by

implants, for years and years. But there is a percentage that are. I don't

know what that

percentage is, but I know it is real. And that is what they should be looking

for, and what

are the common factors? Instead, I still believe that the studies have been

framed by those

wanting to find positive results. It's the ol' 's corollary: draw the

graph, then plot

the points. That's what they have done. And managed to get away with it.

>

> That is the sanest article on this subject that I have read since the

reapproval. It's sad

that so much evidence exists showing how this device poses grave health and

safety risks,

with the potential to impact millions of women-- and yet it didn't make a bit of

difference

in the FDA decision. It feels as though the Dark Ages are coming back, but this

time it's

the corporations that everyone is worshipping, while science is thrown by the

wayside.

> Bindi

> At last, a good article about the FDA's approval of

toxic bags!

>

>

> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=57075 & nfid=rssfeeds

>

[Guest guest]

Sybil Goldrich has been one of our advocates (however controversial) for a long time.freebindi <bindi@...> wrote: That is the sanest article on this subject that I have read since the reapproval. It's sad that so much evidence exists showing how this device poses grave health and safety risks, with the potential to impact millions of women-- and yet it didn't make a bit of difference in the FDA decision. It feels as though the Dark Ages are coming back, but this

time it's the corporations that everyone is worshipping, while science is thrown by the wayside. Bindi At last, a good article about the FDA's approval of toxic bags! http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=57075 & nfid=rssfeeds