Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: a, Molly?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Patty, I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after explant is going to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us, but the legal system is so screwed that black becomes white. Rogene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are talking about proving a systemic connection - nope, that isn't

enough.

>

> Patty,

>

> I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after

explant is going

to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us,

but the legal

system is so screwed that black becomes white.

>

> Rogene

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, just proving that removing implants helps women get better, even when the doctors are telling them it's not the implants. We have lots of proof of that. My hope is that by proving that women are getting better ( and we know that it is happening because of the many stories on this group) that we can stop doctors from claiming that it's not the implants, when it clearly IS. PattyMolly Bloom <mollyb54@...> wrote: If you are talking about proving a systemic connection - nope, that isn't

enough.>> Patty,> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after explant is going to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us, but the legal system is so screwed that black becomes white.> > Rogene> __________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so too, Patty.

> >

> > Patty,

> >

> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after

explant is

going

> to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to

us, but the

legal

> system is so screwed that black becomes white.

> >

> > Rogene

> >

>

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope so too, Patty.

> >

> > Patty,

> >

> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after

explant is

going

> to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to

us, but the

legal

> system is so screwed that black becomes white.

> >

> > Rogene

> >

>

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patty, That women get much better after removing their implants SHOULD be proof . . but, a scientific sense, it's not. I wish it was! . .. Rogene Tricia Trish <glory2glory1401@...> wrote: Nope, just proving that removing implants helps women get better, even when the doctors are telling them it's not the implants. We have lots of proof of that. My hope is that by

proving that women are getting better ( and we know that it is happening because of the many stories on this group) that we can stop doctors from claiming that it's not the implants, when it clearly IS. PattyMolly Bloom <mollyb54bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote: If you are talking about proving a systemic connection - nope, that isn't enough.>> Patty,> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after explant is going to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us, but the legal system is so screwed that black becomes white.> >

Rogene> __________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what, though....why should there even be scientific proof needed to show that removing the implants helps women get better? Isn't women's testimony enough? If a woman does not get the kind of help she needs to get her health back because doctors are telling her it's not the implants, and yet women are getting their health back with implant removal, shouldn't those doctors be held accountable for sidetracking women from getting help? PattyRogene S <saxony01@...> wrote: Patty, That women get much better after removing their implants SHOULD be proof . . but, a scientific sense, it's not. I wish it was! . .. Rogene Tricia Trish <glory2glory1401 > wrote: Nope, just proving that removing implants helps women get better, even when the doctors are telling them it's not the implants. We have lots of proof of that. My hope is that by proving that women are getting better ( and we know that it is happening because of the many stories on this group) that we can stop doctors from claiming that it's not the implants, when it clearly IS. PattyMolly Bloom <mollyb54bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote: If you are talking about proving a systemic connection - nope, that isn't enough.>> Patty,> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after explant is going to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us, but the legal system is so screwed that black becomes white.> > Rogene> __________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if EVERY woman who is explanted and gets her health back goes back to her old doctors and shows him/her how they have recovered after being explanted, the medical profession would begin to take notice. . . ly, I believe there is pressure on doctors to ignore this issue. . . See what happened to Drs. Blais and Lykissa when they went counter to the "standard" . .. An excellent neurologist in Fort Worth was helping women with very conservative treatment - much of which we recommend here . . . He was lambasted in the New York Times as a quack! . . . So he quit seeing implant women. In California, the Medical Association ruled that any doc who spoke out, contrary to their edits, could lose his license. . . It's going to take some strong docs to stand up to the "powers-that-be" to get the truth out . . . I'm sure there are a growing number of doctors who know the truth

.. . . but with their careers at stake, who is going to stand up for us? Rogene Tricia Trish <glory2glory1401@...> wrote: You know what, though....why should there even be scientific proof needed to show that removing the implants helps women get better? Isn't women's testimony enough? If a woman does not get the kind of help she needs to get her health back because doctors are telling her it's not the implants, and

yet women are getting their health back with implant removal, shouldn't those doctors be held accountable for sidetracking women from getting help? PattyRogene S <saxony01 > wrote: Patty, That women get much better after removing their implants SHOULD be proof . . but, a scientific sense, it's not. I wish it was! . .. Rogene Tricia Trish <glory2glory1401 > wrote: Nope, just proving that removing implants helps women get better, even when the doctors are telling them it's not the implants. We have

lots of proof of that. My hope is that by proving that women are getting better ( and we know that it is happening because of the many stories on this group) that we can stop doctors from claiming that it's not the implants, when it clearly IS. PattyMolly Bloom <mollyb54bellsouth (DOT) net> wrote: If you are talking about proving a systemic connection - nope, that isn't enough.>> Patty,> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after explant is going to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to us, but the legal system is so screwed that black becomes

white.> > Rogene> __________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I had an answer for that, Rogene.

Alas, I don't. I think the only hope we have anymore is through women

networking with

other women.

I don't think most doctors are going to stick their necks out.

> >

> > Patty,

> >

> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think recovering after

explant is

going

> to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be proof to

us, but the

legal

> system is so screwed that black becomes white.

> >

> > Rogene

> >

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rogene, I've been hearing through the holistic grapewine, and it's

been my experience that more and more doctors are learning about

herbs and homeopathy, because they HAVE to be in the know. There was

even a homeopathic pamphlet in the clinic pamphlet shelf last time I

went to the Doctors office. It said that homeopathy is the second

most popular treatment, next to allopathic medicine.

Hopefully, if we all keep talking and asking for alternatives, they

will see that that's where the money will be in the near future. I

know a few doctors who distribute Herbalife products in the U.S. They

tried them and couldn't keep the good news from their families and

patients any longer. Their patients are doing so well, and they are

happy with that. Hooray for them!!

Let's keep the faith and fight the good fight!

Love,

Sunny :)

s

> >

> > Patty,

> >

> > I'm sure Molly can answer the question . . . I don't think

recovering after explant is going

> to rise to the level of proof that the courts demand . .. It may be

proof to us, but the legal

> system is so screwed that black becomes white.

> >

> > Rogene

> >

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________________________

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...