Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Stakeholders Meeting Summary

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Here is the meeting summary from the Stakeholders Meeting of 3/8/00

(see below). It is also posted on our website at:

http://www.tdh.state.tx.us/hcqs/ems/stakehldr.htm

Also, hope you will be joining us for the meetings next week:

Advisory Council for EMS and Trauma Systems 8/23-24

Legislative Forum 8/24 (following Advisory Council meeting)

Information re: these meetings may be obtained from our website at:

http://www.tdh.state.tx.us/hcqs/ems/governor.htm

Please contact us if you have any questions re: these issues

(512/834-6740).

Kathy Perkins, Acting Chief

Bureau of Emergency Management

Stakeholders' Meeting Regarding

Proposed Rules 157.32 and 157.33

(EMS Education and Course Approval/Certification)

Wednesday, March 8, 2000, 1:00 - 6:00 PM

Texas Department of Health, Moreton Building, Room M-739

1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas

PURPOSE: The purpose of this meeting was to reach a consensus on

issues regarding proposed rules 157.32 and 157.33 to be presented to

the Governor Appointed Advisory Council for EMS and Trauma at their

March 23 - 24, 2000 meetings (Note: there will be opportunity for

public input at those council meetings).

STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATIONS AND REPRESENTATIVES:

A list of Stakeholder Organizations and their representatives is

attached (all attendees, including members of the audience, were

asked to sign-in).

PROPOSED RULE 157.32: A consensus was reached on the following:

1. Adopt the new National Standard Curriculum for Paramedic education

2. Set Paramedic Certification education at a minimum of 700 hours

plus the EMT-Basic course

3. Omit the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board language from

this rule

4. Maintain current EMT-Intermediate education requirements

PROPOSED RULE 157.33: A consensus was not reached on this rule**,

however, a consensus was reached that taking a test is not the best

way to assess competency. The group agreed to take the following

alternative to the next advisory council meeting for input:

Request the new Advisory Council to recommend the development of a

valid Quality Improvement (QI) process regarding assurance of EMS

personnel competency. Some ideas that were generated regarding this

process included:

a) a QI process could be developed and assessed with the assistance

of peer reviewers and approved by the Bureau of Emergency Management

B) EMS personnel working in a firm who has adopted such a process

would be exempt from the state recertification exam.

c) an EMS Provider could choose not to implement a QI process; in

which case, EMS personnel working in that firm would be required to

pass the recertification exam

**The result is that the current requirements for recertification will

be maintained for the time being.

CONCLUSION: The above issues will be presented to the Advisory Council

on March 23, 2000. Everyone was encouraged to attend and give their

comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...