Guest guest Posted November 11, 1998 Report Share Posted November 11, 1998 Hi All I think we ought to remain addict-l garrett-l. As free speech etc, seems rather topical at the moment, I thought I would ask something that I guess Ken or Chaz will know: I think I read in " AA comes of Age " that AA has managed it's PR very cleverly, right from when it first put Walter under house arrest to make sure he didnt drink prior to a promotional radio broadcast. they couldnt lock up everybody indeifinitely however, and as the 12 & 12 elucidates, some ppl who rushed to microphones got " disastrously drunk " . I think one of the reasons why hardcore AA's often dislike and even dismiss the 12 & 12 is because , perhaps drunk on AA success, dropped quite a few revealing comments abt the deceptive tactics used by AA which are embarassing to modern AA pseudosecularists. The Anonymity tradition is justified by the self-effacing motives of humility, letting other ppl speak well of them, and also not letting anyone take AA over or use it for their own purpose. These last two are manifestly absurd, and dominated it far too much for anyone to have a chance of doing that. What also reveals is the self-serving aspects, which he relates without embarassment. firstly, that vast amounts of favourable publicity that they could not possibly have paid for, all the better for its apparent impartiality. secondly, anonymity was also a protection against anyone getting busted for getting drunk. If AA *really* wanted not to self-promote, and to be let others speak highly of it, the Tradition would be *Dont mention AA in the media*. what it is instead is *dont reveal your name or identity*. You can trumpet AA as much as you like, providing nobody has the faintest idea of who the hell you are. It becomes impossible for anyone to tell whether anything you say abt you is true, either before AA or after it. there will be no evangelist-caught-with-hooker type stories abt you, not matter what you get up to subsequently. they cant even check if you are AA, or whether youre making your radio broadcast between slugs of whiskey. The dismal thing abt this is that journalists bought it, despite the standard journalistic practice of checking ones sources, and hunting out the truth, especially when showing that sacred cows' poop stinks too. AA wrote apparently to all main US news outlets, requesting that they not reveal the identity of any AA. Not, you note, dont let ppl promote AA, but please dont reveal their name, because we we want to be ever-so-humble-Uriah-Heep. In this way the entire news media of the US allowed AA to pull their teeth - or their balls. They ought to *demand* the identity is revealed of course, and seek verification of their stories - or make them pay for broadcasting them like any other advert. This is bad enough, but then this is where my question comes in. I think I read in " AA Comes of Age " abt an incident which is even worse. I sometimes think I dreamt this, hence my earnest wish to have it confirmed or refuted. Apparently, there was a company who made soup or something, and they were going to sponsor some radio broadcasts in which a highly religious (even by AA exacting standards) person was going to trumpet both his band of religion and AA. Pleads for him to stop were ignored - he said he felt " inspired " to make them. why not? it's perfectly Step 11 compliant. If memory serves, AA put a stop to it by writing to the company threatening to boycott their product - and to denounce its linking to AA. It worked. AA had used commercial pressure to maintain its stranglehold on the media. Of course, if it had officical spokespersons as contacxts like an open and honest organization wishing to promote itself in the media would do, it would hardly have needed to resort to such tactics, would it? Somebody please tell me this was all a terrible dream! Pete ---------------------- Cool Briton Whosoever saves One Life Saves the World Entire PERSONALITY-DISORDERS LIST: http://rdz.acor.org/athenaeum/lists.phtml?personality-disorders _____________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.