Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 In a message dated 99-01-02 23:30:55 EST, you write: << You are right, however, if you file a lawsuit that is subject to immediate dismissal, you are a plaintiff on paper only. --- Kayleigh >> Dear Kayleigh, You, too, are correct. But stating a constitutional claim is not that hard. Whether one can proffer evidence sufficient to avoid the defendent's motion to dismiss is the prime consideration. A good attorney can bring even a frivolous claim to trial, though they risk sanctions if the frivolity is egregious. BTW: (me bragging...lol) I beat Lowe (s Bobbitt's attorney in civil court while proceeding pro se. M. Yriondo v. Nalls Bonding Company. andria (Virginia) Circuit Court, before a civil jury (I did the voir dire, etc.). I was my only witness. He had 3 witnesses and another attorney as his " expert witness. " I sued that attorney, also, Christian C. Westerman, in the same court,. and won declatory relief only, since I could not legally (as a non-lawyer) be awared money for performing legal work. I got $2,250 from the bonding company though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 True, but one could have a case based on the idea that it is unconstitutional if it violates the principle of seperation of church and state. In a message dated 1/2/99 7:50:26 PM Central Standard Time, kayleighs@my- dejanews.com writes: << The last time I checked up on it, which admittedly was some time ago, taxpayers did not have standing to file a lawsuit simply because they disliked what their tax dollars were being spent upon. I don't remember the theory upon which this is based, but I think you can see that if such a lawsuit were viable, the government would be subject to interminable lawsuits regarding defense spending, environmental regulations, highways, Sen. X's pet pork project, etc. You yourself are a viable plaintiff because you have been personally damaged. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 In a message dated 1/2/99 11:06:15 PM Central Standard Time, AuguralOne@... writes: << BTW: (me bragging...lol) I beat Lowe (s Bobbitt's attorney in civil court while proceeding pro se. M. Yriondo v. Nalls Bonding Company. andria (Virginia) Circuit Court, before a civil jury (I did the voir dire, etc.). I was my only witness. He had 3 witnesses and another attorney as his " expert witness. " I sued that attorney, also, Christian C. Westerman, in the same court,. and won declatory relief only, since I could not legally (as a non-lawyer) be awared money for performing legal work. I got $2,250 from the bonding company though. >> Good work! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 >You must file a motion within the context of a lawsuit. > >Perhaps you are talking about a declaratory judgment? Those are rarely >entertained. >--- >Kayleigh > > Zz > zZ > |\ z _,,,---,,_ > /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ > |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) Hmmmmm..... I think you can you can file a claim on behafe of of the people when there is evidence of negligent acts. I might be wrong. I have a meeting on Mon. W/mouthpiece and I will ask. Larry ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 Sorry Kayliegh please pardon my ineptness. Hey, I knew what you meant, but I had a couple good minutes picturing what it would be like to set a president. Thought it might be sort of like potting a plant. >Kayleigh > > Zz > zZ > |\ z _,,,---,,_ > /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ > |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 Don't apologize, I loved the thought. --- Kayleigh Zz zZ |\ z _,,,---,,_ /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_) >Sorry Kayliegh please pardon my ineptness. > > >Hey, I knew what you meant, but I had a couple good minutes picturing what >it would be like to set a president. Thought it might be sort of like >potting a plant. > > > > > > >>Kayleigh >> >> Zz >> zZ >> |\ z _,,,---,,_ >> /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ >> |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' >> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) >> > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Waiting for daily BCS updates to arrive in your inbox? >Join the ESPN.com e-group and we will deliver them to you. >http://offers./click/181/0 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 1999 Report Share Posted January 2, 1999 There are certain limited contexts in which you may or must file a claim before filing a suit. These differ from state to state. So you may well be right. --- Kayleigh Zz zZ |\ z _,,,---,,_ /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_) >>You must file a motion within the context of a lawsuit. >> >>Perhaps you are talking about a declaratory judgment? Those are rarely >>entertained. >>--- >>Kayleigh >> >> Zz >> zZ >> |\ z _,,,---,,_ >> /,`.-'`' _ ;-;;,_ >> |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' >> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) > > > >Hmmmmm..... I think you can you can file a claim on behafe of of the people >when there is evidence of negligent acts. I might be wrong. I have a >meeting on Mon. >W/mouthpiece and I will ask. >Larry > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Waiting for daily BCS updates to arrive in your inbox? >Join the ESPN.com e-group and we will deliver them to you. >http://offers./click/181/0 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2002 Report Share Posted November 13, 2002 Got this from another group I belong to and just had to post it. doris Thanksgiving Forecast Turkeys will thaw in the morning, then warm in the oven to an afternoon high near 190 F. The kitchen will turn hot and humid, and if you bother the cook, be ready for a severe squall or cold shoulder. During the late afternoon and evening, the cold front of a knife will slice through the turkey, causing an accumulation of one to two inches on plates. Mashed potatoes will drift across one side while cranberry sauce creates slippery spots on the other. Please pass the gravy. A weight watch and indigestion warning have been issued for the entire area, with increased stuffiness around the beltway. During the evening, the turkey will diminish and taper off to leftovers, dropping to a low of 34' F in the refrigerator. Looking ahead to Friday and Saturday, high pressure to eat sandwiches will be established. Flurries of leftovers can be expected both days with a 50 percent chance of scattered soup late in the day. We expect a warming trend where soup develops. By early next week, eating pressure will be low as the only wish left will be the bone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.