Guest guest Posted November 25, 1998 Report Share Posted November 25, 1998 Kim - you asked for some references re " success " and moderate drug use. Take a look at R. Kaestner, 1994, " New Estimate of Effect of Marijuana and Cocaine Use on Wages, " Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 3, 454-470. Also, same author, 1998 Journal of Drug Issues article, 1997 Journal of Family Issues article, 1991 Journal of Labor Economics article. The prevailing wisdom is that even moderate drug use has a horrendous impact upon work efficiency, and hence we have a 'no tolerance' policy under the Drug Free Workplace Act. Trouble is, the data run counter to goverment policy. Using National Longitudinal Survey of Yourth data, Kaestner found (quote) " large, positive, statistically significant effects of illicit drug use on the wage, for both gender groups and for both mariuana and cocaine. " (Don't misread this; the data is correlational, not causal.) How is this sort of data to be interpreted. First, interpretation is not easy, and the situation is surely multicausal. In part, we know drugs do help short-term job performance (think of caffeine, for example). Is it really so surprising that people might use cocaine moderately, in some circumstances, to respond to extreme work demands (think of all those 16-hour a day Wall Street brokers). Others might use marijuana off the job, as a relaxant. Again, that such use correlates POSITIVELY with wages, despite the propaganda of the drug war, seems intuitively obvious. Another part of the variance is surely just increased effective demand; young people, that is, as they earn more, are able to use some of their wage increase for recreational drugs. Anyway, the general pattern of the data here are quite clear. Those who report more " moderate drug use " also report higher, and not lower, wages. Drug use correlates with " success " on the job, measure in income. All of this is culturally sensitive, of course, and will change as the government focuses more and more upon repression of, say, marijuana. What was " normative " in 1968 is now becoming very deviant. Regarding another type of study, many researchers have simply surveyed their college classes, asking about grades and drug use, then correlating the results. Many of these articles end up summarized in places like High Times, and you can acquire a bibliography easily enough, so I won't bother to dig that stuff out and enter it here. (I think Peele discusses this, and provides a reference or two). The results are consistent. Moderate use correlates with higher GPA. Again, this changes as cultural norms change, and as repression deepens. Don't misread my own intent - I am not interested in being an advocate for or against drug use. The issue doesn't much interest me (though I favor no government interference with moderate use of any drug.) What I AM interested in is the government's use of the " drug " issue as a cover for fascist policies of repression. Anyway, I hope the above is helpful. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.