Re: Cheryl - Miscarrying the natural way

November 17, 2000

Hi. I've also been thinking since I posted that message and I think your

right. Reading Hazel's message just reminded me of my predicament 2 years

ago and letting " nature take its course " didn't work for me, instead caused

an infection. This however is rare--that is, not to expel anything. If I

could turn back time I would have demanded an US instead of politely

requesting one. I'm sure it was an insurance issue. Im sure it will work out

for you Hazel, and the Dr. will keep a close eye on you.

***Also to everyone...what is the deal with baby aspirin? I hadn't heard

the theory.

cheryl

>

>To: <ashermansegroups>

>Subject: Cheryl - Miscarrying the " natural " way

>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:50:00 -0600

>

>Cheryl: I'm afraid that I must respectfully disagree with your advice

>about Haze having a D & C. I know you are a relatively new member to the

>group and may not be aware of this....but D & C's to a " pregnant " uterus are

>the primary cause of Asherman's and the more D & C's you have, the greater

>your risk of new adhesions and scarring. It would be awful for Haze to

>develop NEW scar tissue due to another D & C.

>

>In my opinion, allowing for a " natural " miscarriage - followed by an

>ultrasound to ensure there is no placenta retained (as you suggested) and

>some antibiotics would be the " safer " route to take for an Asherman's

>sufferer. As we are all so fond of saying... " Just my two cents worth! "

>

>Gwen

_________________________________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at

Recommended Posts