Guest guest Posted October 2, 2001 Report Share Posted October 2, 2001 Probably referring to AJCC stages which are used to assess risk category. For papillary and follicular cancer (yours), first assess the UICC stage to get the extent of the tumor as follows (applied to the primary tumor, which I believe is usually the largest of the tumors in a multifocal case): T1 Tumor 1 cm or less in greatest dimension limited to the thyroid T2 Tumor > 1 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension limited to the thyroid T3 Tumor more than 4 cm in greatest dimension limited to the thyroid T4 Tumor of any size extending beyond the thyroid capsule Second, you determine the presense or absense of metastatic lymph node involvement (M0 or M1). From your description, it looks like M1. Third, the presense or absense of distant metastatic lesions (N0 or N1). Finally your age (<45). The AJCC staging then is (for pap ca or foll ca ONLY) If <45, you are automatically Stage I if M0, and Stage II if M1. If >=45, you are Stage I if T1, Stage II if T2 or T3, Stage III if T4 or N1, and Stage IV if M1. For a table, see http://www.cap.org/html/cancer_html/thyr.html So, you are <45, and M1 therefore Stage II. This unfortunately does not really give a good prediction of survival rate. Better to use one of the scoring systems such as those described in the following articles: Byar DP, Green SB, Dor P, et al (Thyroid Cancer ative Group). A prognostic index for thyroid carcinoma: a study of the E.O.R.T.C. Eur J Cancer. 1979; 15:1033-1041. ( " EORTC " score) Cady B, Rossi R. An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 1988; 104:947-953. ( " AMES " Score) DeGroot LJ, Kaplan EL, McCormick M, Straus FH. Natural history, treatment, and course of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71:414-424. Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 1994;97:418-428. Hay ID, Grant CS, WF, McConahey WM. Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system. Surgery. 1987;102:1088-1095 ( " AGES " Score) LE, Cady B. Differentiated thyroid cancer: reexamination of risk groups and outcome of treatment. Arch Surg. 1998;133:419-425. These systems take into account more factors than simply T/M/N and you can find what risk group you are in by reading the articles and addiing your numbers together in the various formulas. You can then follow the tables to see what risk group you are in, and long term survival of those risk groups (which is generally very good with pap ca). A more recent article that compares three of these different systems (AMES/AGES/EORTC) and suggests EORTC and AGES to have better predictive value is Steinmuller T, Klupp J,Rayes N,Ulrich F,Jonas S,Graf KJ and Neuhaus P. Prognostic Factors in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma Eur J Surg 2000; 166: 29-33. Looking at EORTC, for example: Age in years (+12 if male) (+10 if poorly differentiated follicular) (+45 if anaplastic) (+10 if extrathyroidal growth) (+15 if distant metastases). For you that would seem to be: 24+0+0+0+10+0= 34 (I assume no distant metastases). An EORTC Score under 50 (which, based on the info you provide includes you) is the lowest risk group. In the Steinmuller study, for example, out of 42 pap ca in Stage I not a single person died. Also interesting, the type of surgery (PT vs. TT) did not influence survival at all. This was a relatively short term study (median time 72 months) however; 40yrs studies would likely show more, but in any event you would be in the lowest EORTC group based on the info you provided. There are probably other studies that I am not aware of as well ... anyone else? > Stages? > > > I was originally told that if there was mets to the nodes > this changed little, only the initial surgery. What is the mortality > rate difference between stage 1 stage 2 and stage 3? What makes > it stage 2? Being in both lobes or 8 pos nodes? > I realize your TG > is suppressed when your meds are where they should be but am I wrong > in saying the fact that they are getting a reading at all (TG) definitely > means unwanted thyroid tissue somewhere? > > Bergeron(age 24) > elizabetholson0@... > that last 0 is a zero > > pap. thyca 11/00 (both lobes and extensive lymph nodes) > tt 12/00, RAI 175mCi 1/01 > total body scan one week later with residual activity in the neck > TG 1.4 5 months after RAI. TG 2.4 3 months later that is current > as of 2 weeks ago > TSH 2.32, T3T4 1.4, TG antibodies <2, TG 2.4 > > > > > Make a difference, help support the relief efforts in the U.S. > http://clubs.lycos.com/live/events/september11.asp > > > For more information regarding thyroid cancer visit www.thyca.org. If you do not wish to belong to this group, you may UNSUBSCRIBE by sending a blank email to thyca-unsubscribe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.