Re: stones are formed inside liver?

[Guest guest]

>>Why aren't doctors aware of the fact that stones are formed inside liver?

Answer:

If you don't want to be aware of something, then you just don't want, and

nobody can help with that.<<

They are aware, and they know the reasons why.

>>Are there any data that prove fact that stones are formed inside liver?

Answer:

A lot, if you want to search for it.<<

Yes, my doctor diagrammed and explained to me the reasons that would happen,

when there is a blockage.

>>She has seen files of hundreds of patients who came back with a pain,

>>stone

lodged inside common bile duct, AFTER gallbladder was removed some times

ago.<<

Many surgeons do not do cholangiograms, sending patients home with the same

problems.

>>Regardless, the fact is, bile ducts can hold bile, bile can become

>>stagnant,

and stones can be formed inside bile ducts.

If you are unable to understand this, or to accept this, then I can't help

you.<<

Bile flows continuously, unless there is a blockage. Extra bile is stored

in the gallbladder, for use when it is needed.

>>Why aren't doctors aware of the fact that stones are formed inside liver?

There are 3 possible answers:

1. They are stupid and unable to make that conclusion (most likely not).

2. They are smart but they don't want to risk loosing patients or don't want

to

go against the mainstream.

3. They are smart but someone told them not to think too much about that, if

they want to keep their job.

You pick the answer(s) that most likely describes your doctor.<<

Does anyone really believe this? Maybe, I don't know, but I sure don't.

Looks like we are back to the " evil conspiracy " , " all doctors are evil "

mode.

Debra

_________________________________________________________________

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

[Guest guest]

2/24/2002 1:51:01 PM, " D B " <fairyflight@...> wrote:

>Does anyone really believe this? Maybe, I don't know, but I sure don't.

>Looks like we are back to the " evil conspiracy " , " all doctors are evil "

>mode.

It hasn't been all that many years ago that the AMA was found guilty in

Federal Court of conspiring to destroy chiropractic, so, yes, doctors are

capable of conspiracy.

Now, as far as gallbladders. Many years ago the hospital where my

sister worked had a surgical tissue-review committee that was

composed entirely of doctors. No doctor ever lost hospital priviledges for

removing healthy organs. After some rather nasty malpractice suits, the

hospital admin reorganized the committee to include nurses and a few

laypersons. It wasn't too long until the non-doctors started telling the truth

and a few doctors had to accept hospital priviledges suspensions.

Doctors will not tell on other doctors. Is that not at least similar to a

conspiracy. When police officers used to refuse to testify about a

crooked cop wasn't it called a conspiracy of silence? You keep saying

that you had a good surgeon and no one has challenged that. But does

that make all the myriad bad surgeons OK?

Regards,

Rex Harrill

[Guest guest]

>>But does

that make all the myriad bad surgeons OK?<<

It does not make bad surgeons, of which I certainly agree there are some,

OK. I just do not think there are as many of them as you seem to. There

are certainly charletons in alternative health fields, but this does not

represent the entire profession.

Debra

_________________________________________________________________

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com