Got my medical records

[Guest guest]

I requested my medical records from my lap I had done in 1998, and

from my c-section in 2000. I know bu is a birth defect in essence,

but what the dr's wrote do not coincide <eek>.

The dr. from my lap wrote, " The uterus, itself, appeared normal. "

Turns out he didn't do an hsg, I think what was meant when DH was

told my tubes were open is the tubes & fimbria " appeared normal " ,

thus not affected by adhesions or endo.

The dr. from my c/s wrote, " The uterine cavity was evaluated, and

there was felt to be a small thickness at the midline suggestive of a

bicornate uterus. The contour of the uterus was palpable, and this

did indeed show a small bicornate uterus. "

Now, I'm just baffled, lol. How can one dr. say the uterus appeared

normal & the other indicate otherwise? Argh! Anyway, I guess I

shouldn't stress out over any of it unless I end up having m/c's when

we start ttc again.

Lori