Guest guest Posted January 21, 2002 Report Share Posted January 21, 2002 Well, that may be true, but what would the percentage be and how would it relate to the money you have already spent? Perhaps the monies awarded would be so huge that each plaintiff's percentage would be adequate, but that's hard to say. The only way to know for sure is to know what relief is being requested in the particular class action complaint you are involved in. And by the way, I'm not a lawyer here and I'm not offering legal advice. As a said before, I'm a mum to two kids with autism and I work as a paralegal at Waters & Kraus. M. Bothwell Waters & Kraus, LLP 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 Long Beach, California 90802 Tel: (562) 436-8833 Fax: (562) 590-7296 " jsprig2001 " <jsprigmore@my home.net> cc: Subject: [ ] Re: CLaire??class 01/21/2002 action suit? 10:19 AM Please respond to I was under the impression from my attorneys that there may very well be a settlement outside of court and that everyone in the class action suit would get a percent of the monies? If this isn't the case, I would be interested in going another route. We already have spent money on treatment that we don't have. Our only desire in a suit is to have enough to care for our son- if the class action suit isn't going to do that, I have to find another way. Any advice you have would be helpful. Thank you! > > Moira and list, > > Individual suits are the only way parents can recoup money for the loss of > their child(ren) and the subsequent cost of raising them, not to mention > " pain and suffering " . Class action suits cannot award individual damages > for personal injury because every case is different and every person in the > class has different damages. All class action suits can do is go forward > against certain defendants to establish rulings and precedents regarding > negligence and liability. But that is important in relation to individual > suits that come along after. Class action lawsuits also grab the attention > of the media and can bring certain pressure upon defendants in them to > modify their products. They are therefore useful, but they are not > designed to provide individual relief to the plaintiffs in them. People do > tend to get excited about the mention of a " class action " lawsuit - but its > probably true that the only people who benefit monetarily are the lawyers > that file them. > > What parents on this list must be aware of, however, is that once you make > a connection between vaccines and your child's autism, your statute has > started to run and in some states (California for one) you only have a year > from that date to file a lawsuit. Therefore, if you suspect vaccines may > have injured your child, and you think you might want to make a claim for > damages, you must be aware that your statute is already running. > > I'm also the parent of two children with autism. I live with these issues > at work and at home. > > M. Bothwell > Waters & Kraus, LLP > 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 > Long Beach, California 90802 > Tel: (562) 436-8833 > Fax: (562) 590-7296 > > > > > Moria > Merriweather Autism- Mercury@y... > <moriam@earthl cc: > ink.net> Subject: Re: [Autism- Mercury] Re: class action > suit? > 01/20/2002 > 07:35 AM > Please respond > to > Autism- Mercury > > > > > > > >They're doing individual cases, that's why I went with them. I think if > you > >go with a class action it's the lawyers who make all the money from what > I've > >heard. > > > > if this is correct, it is sure too bad. I think only a class action > can get compensation for all the injured kids -- and, of course, that > is only if it is an inclusive enough " class " . just my 2 cents. > I have no idea if ANY of the legal stuff will " pan out " . But, > personally, I would like it if everyone's therapy (chelation, etc) > could be paid for.... > > Moria > [not a parent] > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 21, 2002 Report Share Posted January 21, 2002 , I did not know you had two kids with autism?? I spoke with you about my case then it was transferred to texas and then you know the rest.. You and walters and krause were such a help to me. that must be great to be working for them with all of this going on. Good luck to you. kathy dunkelberger PS: Is till have nto received the results of my son's mercury testing and it was done on november 6th. This is sooo long..i have re called the docs office to no avail....i am wondering if it was not messed up for some reason..ialready paid the dr fees and for the bloodwork so this would be just awful... it must be my luck this type of thing always happens.. i am just focusing now on providin gmy son with the best life, education, and experiences that i can...thanks again for your help...----- Original Message ----- From: <claire@...> < > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: CLaire??class action suit? > > Well, that may be true, but what would the percentage be and how would it > relate to the money you have already spent? Perhaps the monies awarded > would be so huge that each plaintiff's percentage would be adequate, but > that's hard to say. The only way to know for sure is to know what relief > is being requested in the particular class action complaint you are > involved in. > > And by the way, I'm not a lawyer here and I'm not offering legal advice. > As a said before, I'm a mum to two kids with autism and I work as a > paralegal at Waters & Kraus. > > M. Bothwell > Waters & Kraus, LLP > 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 > Long Beach, California 90802 > Tel: (562) 436-8833 > Fax: (562) 590-7296 > > > > > " jsprig2001 " > <jsprigmore@my To: > home.net> cc: > Subject: [ ] Re: CLaire??class > 01/21/2002 action suit? > 10:19 AM > Please respond > to > > > > > > > > I was under the impression from my attorneys that there may very > well be a settlement outside of court and that everyone in the class > action suit would get a percent of the monies? If this isn't the > case, I would be interested in going another route. We already have > spent money on treatment that we don't have. Our only desire in a > suit is to have enough to care for our son- if the class action suit > isn't going to do that, I have to find another way. > Any advice you have would be helpful. Thank you! > > > > Moira and list, > > > > Individual suits are the only way parents can recoup money for the > loss of > > their child(ren) and the subsequent cost of raising them, not to > mention > > " pain and suffering " . Class action suits cannot award individual > damages > > for personal injury because every case is different and every > person in the > > class has different damages. All class action suits can do is go > forward > > against certain defendants to establish rulings and precedents > regarding > > negligence and liability. But that is important in relation to > individual > > suits that come along after. Class action lawsuits also grab the > attention > > of the media and can bring certain pressure upon defendants in > them to > > modify their products. They are therefore useful, but they are not > > designed to provide individual relief to the plaintiffs in them. > People do > > tend to get excited about the mention of a " class action " lawsuit - > but its > > probably true that the only people who benefit monetarily are the > lawyers > > that file them. > > > > What parents on this list must be aware of, however, is that once > you make > > a connection between vaccines and your child's autism, your > statute has > > started to run and in some states (California for one) you only > have a year > > from that date to file a lawsuit. Therefore, if you suspect > vaccines may > > have injured your child, and you think you might want to make a > claim for > > damages, you must be aware that your statute is already running. > > > > I'm also the parent of two children with autism. I live with > these issues > > at work and at home. > > > > M. Bothwell > > Waters & Kraus, LLP > > 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 > > Long Beach, California 90802 > > Tel: (562) 436-8833 > > Fax: (562) 590-7296 > > > > > > > > > > > > Moria > > > Merriweather Autism- > Mercury@y... > > <moriam@earthl > cc: > > ink.net> Subject: Re: [Autism- > Mercury] Re: class action > > > suit? > > > 01/20/2002 > > > 07:35 > AM > > Please > respond > > > to > > > Autism- > Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >They're doing individual cases, that's why I went with them. I > think if > > you > > >go with a class action it's the lawyers who make all the money > from what > > I've > > >heard. > > > > > > > if this is correct, it is sure too bad. I think only a class > action > > can get compensation for all the injured kids -- and, of course, > that > > is only if it is an inclusive enough " class " . just my 2 cents. > > I have no idea if ANY of the legal stuff will " pan out " . But, > > personally, I would like it if everyone's therapy (chelation, etc) > > could be paid for.... > > > > Moria > > [not a parent] > > > > > > ======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2002 Report Share Posted January 22, 2002 Hi Kathy. Yes, two of my three children have autism. My son, Will, is 9. My daughter Kate is 7. My youngest, Jillian, 5, is " neuro-typical " , I guess. Whatever that is! All I know is she is not autistic. When my son was diagnosed there was no internet. No one we came across suggested we look at his autism from a medical standpoint. We were told the usual " no one knows what causes autism, but it's probably genetic. " We went along with that and set about getting Will the best therapy we could. For us, that was Lovaas. We were fortunate to get on with the Lovaas Institute at UCLA and within a couple of months I had hired enough therapists to provide him with a 35-40 hour a week program. (That was later reduced as he went to school and did better, and he finally 'graduated' after 5 years with Lovaas). We also did OT/SI twice a week and private speech therapy and adaptive P.E. Will was diagnosed with autism shortly before his 3rd birthday. At the time, Kate was 5 months old. She was diagnosed with autism when she was 2.5 years old, although she was not as " autistic " as her brother. By then our surprise baby had arrived and was 8 months old. I simply couldn't enjoy her babyhood at all. I just wanted to fast forward her to 3 so I could know if she was going to develop autism or not. After my son was diagnosed in 1995 I spent the next five years battling with our school district for services for both children and then battling with the regional center too. To date, we've had two due process hearings with the district, another one settled at mediation; three appeals hearings with the regional center and countless IEP and IFSP meetings. I was exhausted from running the home program, dealing with the yo-yos at the district, and driving both children to their various therapies all over the area. I used to think even if Jilly never was autistic, we'd be lucky if she ever learned to walk since she spent most of her day in a car seat! About three years ago I started a support group for our local ASA chapter to try to meet the needs of the parents of newly diagnosed children with autism. I didn't want one more family to be told 'no' by the school district or regional center and not know what to do. Unfortunately, our group grows in numbers all the time and more people call me at home every month. Just more confirmation of the increase in the numbers of children with autism. I went back to work full time last year and was fortunate that Andy Waters, who I had worked for before, wanted to open a California office. It was then that I got interested in the mercury/vaccines connection to autism and started looking at my children in a different light. Here's my own little study: Will received all of the shots, including both MMRs. He was " classically " autistic (except he wasn't born like that). Kate received all of the shots through her first MMR. Then the rumors about a connection to autism came out and I refused to vaccinate her further until more research was done. Kate was autistic, but much milder than her brother. Jilly received the standard shots except that some of hers did not have thimerosal and she did not get either of the MMRs. She is not autistic, but does have an articulation problem. All three were conceived, carried and born in the same house. Kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? Would Kate be worse if she'd topped of her heavy metals load with another MMR? Would Jilly have autism? I am chelating all of them. Last year my husband, who is a lawyer, left his position as a partner in a law firm he'd been with for 16 years and started his own practice in special education. His entire practice is now representing parents of children with autism seeking services from their school district or regional center. I think that is just shocking! M. Bothwell Waters & Kraus, LLP 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 Long Beach, California 90802 Tel: (562) 436-8833 Fax: (562) 590-7296 " kathyd " <kmdunk@myexce To: l.com> < > cc: 01/21/2002 Subject: Re: [ ] Re: 11:00 AM CLaire??class action suit? Please respond to , I did not know you had two kids with autism?? I spoke with you about my case then it was transferred to texas and then you know the rest.. You and walters and krause were such a help to me. that must be great to be working for them with all of this going on. Good luck to you. kathy dunkelberger PS: Is till have nto received the results of my son's mercury testing and it was done on november 6th. This is sooo long..i have re called the docs office to no avail....i am wondering if it was not messed up for some reason..ialready paid the dr fees and for the bloodwork so this would be just awful... it must be my luck this type of thing always happens.. i am just focusing now on providin gmy son with the best life, education, and experiences that i can...thanks again for your help...----- Original Message ----- From: <claire@...> < > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: CLaire??class action suit? > > Well, that may be true, but what would the percentage be and how would it > relate to the money you have already spent? Perhaps the monies awarded > would be so huge that each plaintiff's percentage would be adequate, but > that's hard to say. The only way to know for sure is to know what relief > is being requested in the particular class action complaint you are > involved in. > > And by the way, I'm not a lawyer here and I'm not offering legal advice. > As a said before, I'm a mum to two kids with autism and I work as a > paralegal at Waters & Kraus. > > M. Bothwell > Waters & Kraus, LLP > 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 > Long Beach, California 90802 > Tel: (562) 436-8833 > Fax: (562) 590-7296 > > > > > " jsprig2001 " > <jsprigmore@my To: > home.net> cc: > Subject: [ ] Re: CLaire??class > 01/21/2002 action suit? > 10:19 AM > Please respond > to > > > > > > > > I was under the impression from my attorneys that there may very > well be a settlement outside of court and that everyone in the class > action suit would get a percent of the monies? If this isn't the > case, I would be interested in going another route. We already have > spent money on treatment that we don't have. Our only desire in a > suit is to have enough to care for our son- if the class action suit > isn't going to do that, I have to find another way. > Any advice you have would be helpful. Thank you! > > > > Moira and list, > > > > Individual suits are the only way parents can recoup money for the > loss of > > their child(ren) and the subsequent cost of raising them, not to > mention > > " pain and suffering " . Class action suits cannot award individual > damages > > for personal injury because every case is different and every > person in the > > class has different damages. All class action suits can do is go > forward > > against certain defendants to establish rulings and precedents > regarding > > negligence and liability. But that is important in relation to > individual > > suits that come along after. Class action lawsuits also grab the > attention > > of the media and can bring certain pressure upon defendants in > them to > > modify their products. They are therefore useful, but they are not > > designed to provide individual relief to the plaintiffs in them. > People do > > tend to get excited about the mention of a " class action " lawsuit - > but its > > probably true that the only people who benefit monetarily are the > lawyers > > that file them. > > > > What parents on this list must be aware of, however, is that once > you make > > a connection between vaccines and your child's autism, your > statute has > > started to run and in some states (California for one) you only > have a year > > from that date to file a lawsuit. Therefore, if you suspect > vaccines may > > have injured your child, and you think you might want to make a > claim for > > damages, you must be aware that your statute is already running. > > > > I'm also the parent of two children with autism. I live with > these issues > > at work and at home. > > > > M. Bothwell > > Waters & Kraus, LLP > > 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 > > Long Beach, California 90802 > > Tel: (562) 436-8833 > > Fax: (562) 590-7296 > > > > > > > > > > > > Moria > > > Merriweather Autism- > Mercury@y... > > <moriam@earthl > cc: > > ink.net> Subject: Re: [Autism- > Mercury] Re: class action > > > suit? > > > 01/20/2002 > > > 07:35 > AM > > Please > respond > > > to > > > Autism- > Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >They're doing individual cases, that's why I went with them. I > think if > > you > > >go with a class action it's the lawyers who make all the money > from what > > I've > > >heard. > > > > > > > if this is correct, it is sure too bad. I think only a class > action > > can get compensation for all the injured kids -- and, of course, > that > > is only if it is an inclusive enough " class " . just my 2 cents. > > I have no idea if ANY of the legal stuff will " pan out " . But, > > personally, I would like it if everyone's therapy (chelation, etc) > > could be paid for.... > > > > Moria > > [not a parent] > > > > > > ======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2002 Report Share Posted January 22, 2002 , Wow..what a stoy!! You are a remarkable woman! What a wonderfulfamily also!! do you mind if I forward this to two of my friends. One is a reporter and she just recently did a story on autism and the difficulties inthe school . Unfortunately Ilive in this very peculiar area and the letters to the editor support the school..overlooking the fact that children were in closets and restrained etc.....amazing! I do believe the newswriter did get manyletters to her from those that have difficulties with the school however most people are afraid to go public like myself and my son. Also, Ihave a friend that has a child with a disability and due to his own experience withthe ed system he went to law school...i think he is just finishing up...he also represents parents as an advocate and he represented me for free...he may be interested in talking with your spouse or you if you have the time. I am so glad we met! I did not know all of this when i spoke to you at the law firm. I am actually considering going to be a lawyer and had an apointment..jsut a few things that I can't seem to get around to do such as take the lsat1s!! HA HA! Thus, with my schedule I am thinking about a legal nurse consultant to be a professional witness inthese cases. I have a certification in psychiatric and mental health nursing as well as TEACCH, FASTFORWORD and many other credentials working with children with autism...as an RN with a cert inpsych..I know what is happening in the schools is so illegal...especially the restraints...i saw them tie a kid up ...first of all he did not need this it was for their convenience..secondly...they did not have the expertise to use this type of technicque or the correct restraints if this would be needed..they took these rubber like exercise bands and tied it to the chair and the desk after putting the kid in the seat...it was gutwrenching to watch the child screaming (he also had a movement disorder) while they did this..he was happy and playing until they tied him then he cried...so it was not used for protection of self or others..clearly jsut to keep him in the chair...awful ....anyother person including a nurse, parent, police officer..would have been held liable but i found out that school' sdo their own investigation and children and youth would not investigate the school...amazing...anyone else would be in jail... anyway..gotta go...what do you think about a legal nurse consultant ?? Do you think it could benefit the kids if I did htis and then gave my name to attorneys that work in special ed law?? I also have experience testifying in competency hearings as well as commitment hearings...( I think some of the educators i have worked with should be committed and that they are not always competent!!!) HA! Have a great night and thanks for sharing... I am still working on getting a letter together to the bar assoc about that attorney who basically did my son in with that vaccine case...again..i am jsut amazed at how these people treat children with disabilities..i am so tired of fighting at times... kathyd Re: [Autism- > > Mercury] Re: class action > > > > > suit? > > > > > 01/20/2002 > > > > > 07:35 > > AM > > > Please > > respond > > > > > to > > > > > Autism- > > Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >They're doing individual cases, that's why I went with them. I > > think if > > > you > > > >go with a class action it's the lawyers who make all the money > > from what > > > I've > > > >heard. > > > > > > > > > > if this is correct, it is sure too bad. I think only a class > > action > > > can get compensation for all the injured kids -- and, of course, > > that > > > is only if it is an inclusive enough " class " . just my 2 cents. > > > I have no idea if ANY of the legal stuff will " pan out " . But, > > > personally, I would like it if everyone's therapy (chelation, etc) > > > could be paid for.... > > > > > > Moria > > > [not a parent] > > > > > > > > > ======================================================= > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2002 Report Share Posted January 22, 2002 Hi : Hope you are well. Great to see you in LA a few weeks ago. Does your husband take on cases in Texas? If so I have quite a few folks I would love to refer his way. We have a shortage of good special ed lawyers here in Texas and I just know enough in that area to be dangerous, usually after consulting with , Mayerson and Pete . Let me know. My best. Peacefully, Jeff Sell Hitt * * Sell 4309 Yoakum Blvd. Suite 2000 Houston, TX 77006 713.654.7776 713.654.7789 (fax) www.HittSell.com JZSell@... (office) jzsell@... (home) 832.797.8191 (cell/v-mail) www.vaccineinjury.org ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:22:15 -0800 From: claire@... Subject: Re: Re: CLaire??class action suit? ***************************************************** Last year my husband, who is a lawyer, left his position as a partner in a law firm he'd been with for 16 years and started his own practice in special education. His entire practice is now representing parents of children with autism seeking services from their school district or regional center. I think that is just shocking! M. Bothwell Waters & Kraus, LLP 200 Oceangate, Suite 520 Long Beach, California 90802 Tel: (562) 436-8833 Fax: (562) 590-7296 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2002 Report Share Posted January 23, 2002 , all the accolades in the world aren't enough for you after reading about your experiences. And I thought I had it tough (in Alta Loma, CA) after winning a Lovaas type ABA program funding via WE SELPA and then was chagrined to learn that Regional Center WOULDN'T follow suit and pick up the other half of the expenses of such a program!!!! We went to their hearing (just once) and then, luckily (over christmas vacation) I discovered that the Regional center had presented a phoney document to the judge (a souped up IPP). Thank God I had the original they had given to me. My attorney, jumped for joy, yelling, " We've got em!!! " Strange how they met our requirements so easily after pointing out the stinky IPP to them.... I get incensed over knowing that a quasi governmental agency can try to pull off such frauds to the detriment of needy autistic children. One of the persons involved that dirty trick holds a high position in the Regional center now.....a reward for her performance???!!! In my government job, I would be fired immediately if I performed such actions. Congress should hold hearings on Regional Centers questionable actions... I really admire your spunk and tenatiousness. Keep the faith, baby. L. Aly Re: [Autism- > Mercury] Re: class action > > > suit? > > > 01/20/2002 > > > 07:35 > AM > > Please > respond > > > to > > > Autism- > Mercury > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >They're doing individual cases, that's why I went with them. I > think if > > you > > >go with a class action it's the lawyers who make all the money > from what > > I've > > >heard. > > > > > > > if this is correct, it is sure too bad. I think only a class > action > > can get compensation for all the injured kids -- and, of course, > that > > is only if it is an inclusive enough " class " . just my 2 cents. > > I have no idea if ANY of the legal stuff will " pan out " . But, > > personally, I would like it if everyone's therapy (chelation, etc) > > could be paid for.... > > > > Moria > > [not a parent] > > > > > > ======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.