Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hi Apple; AA also forces codependent behavior on men if you look at The Programmed Group as the dominator. I must subvert my will to The Program's God, do as the program does for the benefit of, not me, but rather the group, then I must help expand the group and help it grow to subvert other folks for the benefit of the group. If after doing these by rote from the book, things go wrong, I must take the blame. However, if all goes well, credit goes to the program. The programmed Group is in a win/win situation, but I am in a no win situation, I can never be right, only wrong. I think that's almost codependency defined. I must always look out for the group, our stories show, the group looks out for no one but itself. I'm speaking of post 1967, prior to that there was help for individuals in some groups as my own 1966 story shows. Oh usually personality cults like Clancy's group has been described die out after the personality dies, even his assistant Guru's usually aren't as radical after he dies. The " Little People " hang on mostly for a touch of the masters robe and when the master dies, they are lost and wander away. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hi All; Alas, I use windows 3.11, no real player written for my operating system. Sigh, I don't get to hear Clancy, that disturbs me. Of course, there's a win95 computer 5 feet from me with Real Player, but I'd have to learn to operate it. It's Rose's computer. I was hogging the internet and so was Rose, so we got a new computer a while back. You Girls always get the best stuff, sigh. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 I have heard about the Clancy nonsense. I though the only requirement was a desire not to drink? Dresscodes? I know about gorup autonamy, but I thought that running a cult within AA might affect the fellowship as a whole. I guess not. souns more like AMWAY to me more than anything thereputic. I wonder if athesits or gays would be welcome to Clancy's moral army. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hey ; Glad you posted. Gives me a chance to apologize to you personally for " My old uncles saying " . It was thoughtless of me to post it and no offense was meant. Sometimes the things I say in jest can be offensive and I sort of try to edit myself, but this time I screwed up. As to gays or anyone different, I doubt they'd be welcome and being gay is probably treated as sin. As someone(I think or Apple said, Different=Bad, Conformity=Good. Now I'd be the last to say that Conformity is always bad or that Different is always good. There is in my reality a proportion to these things. As to being a good citizen of my community I pretty much conform. I conform to the law, I vote everytime I get the chance because not voting I automatically become someone else's servant and give up the right to bitch. I cannot imagine myself giving up the right to GRIPE! I try to keep the house I live in looking decent on the outside etc. I believe these conformities to be as much a part of my recovery as my ability to think differently and run our business differently. Unlike Clancy, I believe " If it feels good, DO IT! " I think everybody here knows that doesn't include illegal things or indulging in substance abuse. Neither of those things has a lasting feel good. But if I happen to be dressed " White Tie " and decide to fly kites with some kids, well where's the harm?, except maybe a dry cleaning bill and that don't hurt much. I feel not being afraid to look silly, is part of having fun. Reverend King said he dreamed of when his children would be judged by the content of their character, rather than the color of their skin. Clancy has the emphasis on skin color,ie outside appearances. This is destructive to the spirit of a person. What if after three or so years sober I cannot afford a good suit, perhaps still paying off old bills and raising a family concurrently. That would prohibit me from speaking and getting the kudo's the folks with cash get. Doesn't sound good, doesn't even sound like old time AA and I was there in the latter part of 59, what was considered to be the " Good Old Days " Guys from The Then Clive Prison Farm came in prison clothes sometimes, many became regular members upon release. Old Time AA was not The Clancy Model you folks have been talking about. Sounds like he is The Reverend Moon, who happens to be in AA. Or you could say " The Abusive Father of AA " IMO. I never put the " H " in because I really don't want to be known as humble. I have had really good folks humble me, just because they were so good that I failed a comparison, however, humility is in the eye of the beholder, sort of like beauty. I would be loathe to say I am not humble, I'd just rather not have it said about me because, to me it brings a false stereotyped image to mind. To me humility in a person simply means having a realistic knowlege of my strength's, weaknesses and where I fit in the scheme of things. If I said I was an average technician, it would be as much a lie as if I said I was the best in the USA. I am an excellent technician, but I've met a few that are my superior, also many that are my inferior. About my technical ability I can use empirical evidence. Many things I can find no empirical evidence either way, so I trust my own opinion, until some strong evidence forces me to change my opinion. I believe this is called free thinking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hey ; Scary is RIGHT. My AA friend in Hawaii escaped California due to the Purist AA Movement and he was a demanded speaker all over the west coast. He says if he moves back to the mainland it won't be California. He has more degrees that I've had affairs and he's a Jew to boot. A VERY interesting man and I value his opinion on most anything, though I may disagree with it. He calls himself an AA apologist, because of what has happened to folks like me in AA and he acknowleges that my problems were exacerbated by AA without reservation. He also says though if he'd been my sponsor he would have advised a shrink because he has similar problems and saw a shrink. He and I are at odds on many things, but allow each other the differences. For any AA's who happen to be lurking and cannot understand that, it's called " Friendship and intellectual integrity " Two concepts generally foriegn to AA. , don't you think the lack of Clancy's annual blessing will put a crimp in the desciples act, with no presence of an Authority Figure? Or might they get even more zealous and further to the AA right? Might they splinter, without the combining force of Clancy's personality? That would be my guess, every group leader competing for the Master's throne and dividing the groups in the fight. The democratic process does not work well in AA and I say that from being a GSR and listening to the petty doctrinal divisive bullshit. How much worse would it be in the Theocracy of a Clancy type personality cult? I would think the sicker the group the worse it would get. Everyone claiming to have the ear of God. Take a look at the problems surrounding and as a result of the death of a Pope, and there they have a ritual for succession firmly in place. Does Clancy have one in place. I'd say no because he deep down believes he's immortal. Most religous cult leaders have that problem. It's a pretty sure thing you'll see it, I may not. I wrote a short humor piece about being arrested for AA crimes for another list, it didn't go over well, at least not one soul commented. The list was called Recovering Rationally, but either no one had a sense of humor or I just flopped, don't know which. I've since formatted this hard drive, but it's probably archived, I'll try to look it up and test the waters here. Rose liked it, but she's maybe biased. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 " It's sin and pennance when you get down to the nitty gritty, ala St Augustine who ate his own feces for punishment for addiction. And they made him a saint for doing it. What a crock of....... for St Augustine anyway. " LOL . I'll bet this is St Augustine of HIppo, who is the patron saint of Sex and Love Addicts Anonymous. Of course, they dont *call* him the patron saint of course, but thats what he clearly is; their alternative name is the Augustine Fellowship. Of course, they use the " outside matters " Tradition to argue that it doesnt matter that this guy was a Saint, whereas in reality of course, they ought to avoid adopting him for that reason. Pete ---------------------- Grant me the Strength To Change the Things I Can Not Accept PERSONALITY DISORDERS SUPPORT/INFO LIST: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/personality-disorders.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Ben wrote: 'I have a couple of second editions, which are no big deal, but are fun to haul out (theoretically speaking, since I no longer go to meetings) when someone starts to quote the 'acceptance' paragraph on page 449 of the Third Edition.' I have a particular interest in this passage. could you explain what you mean here? Are you referring to the fact that it wasnt in the original book, and hence cant be considered main AA program? Pete ---------------------- Grant me the Strength To Change the Things I Can Not Accept PERSONALITY DISORDERS SUPPORT/INFO LIST: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/personality-disorders.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hi ; I did a search at Egroups.com and came up with it. I posted this in Nov. of 98. Hope you like it better than the RR Group did Hi all; I guess most of you know I had a heart operation a few years back. Well my doctor he has some silly notion that these 2 to 2and 1/2 packs a cigarettes I smoke everyday are gonna' hurt me somehow. Truth be told I've been kinda' wanting to quit anyway. When I had the surgeon the chief of surgery said I was the only guy he ever allowed to smoke on the cardiac ward in recovery (I bitch A LOT, when denied my nicotine.) Anyway he said I could have 4 cigarettes a day. Well that ain't enough for morning coffee, let a lone all day. So just to spite him I didn't smoke any for the rest of the time I was there(about 5 more days). Now one might ask why I didn't just quit then. I have asked myself that more than a few times. Anyway yesterday I joined Nicotines Anonymous and got me a sponsor today. Ya' see the idea is if I get the urge to smoke, I just call my sponsor, he brings a jug of whiskey and we get drunk until the urge to smoke passes. Rose didn't take to the idea too well and I don't have a bed in my shop so being a joiner I had to find something to take the place of NA. Well, I joined Alcoholic's Unanimous. They keep the club door locked and to get in you have to stand by the door and shout the club's initials " A U! " and somebody lets you in. Well I got a sore throat and thrown in jail, before I figured out I was the first one there. Anyway I got to jail after the obligatory caress with the batons and the booking clerk asked my name and I told him. He asked me how to spell it so I spelled it for him. He said I was wrong. I asked, " do you belong to AA? " He asked " How did you know? " I said " Lucky Guess. " So he booked me for Dry drunkeness and disorderly denial and I asked " how much is bail? " He said " No bail, them's serious charges. " I asked, " Could I call my wife? " " Man you want me to add catastrophic codependency to these charges? " , he replied " Let me do you a favor man, you gonna' be here anyway, so read this tonight. " He handed me a Big Book and I said " I think I'll wait for the movie " . Error (A) Abort ® Retry (F) Fail (I) Influence with hammer If you've never used MS Dos exclusively for your operating sytem you don't know how true the above line is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 I did not take offense at what your " old uncle " said.... In fact, I don't remember what he said! :.) As for Clancy's group, I don't know...but I guess that they probably would accept gays and atheists (or anyone else) who would play by their rules. In one of my " home groups " , the rule was that one should never say that he or she is gay and change their story if necessary to obey this rule. While I do not have a completely p.c. sense of humor, and can take an occasional gay joke, keeping my entire life a secret seemed to be contrary to AA philosophy. In general, the gag rule also applied toward individuals, not just at the group level. I guess that I never felt the " great relief " of sharing my story honestly that many members claimed to feel. Now, I don't know how important this kind of " sharing " is anyway. What do you think? Thanks for being thoughtful, though, . I really enjoy your contributions to this board. - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hi ! I guess the little story explains why Trimpy shut down all the RR groups. :.) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 , I only wish it were true that Clancy's legacy would die with him, but I fear that it won't. Thousands have been indoctrinated in his spirit crushing form of sponsorship, and will continue to be passed along down the line as it was passed to me by my first sponsor. These sponsors are glibly referred to as " Step Nazis " here in Southern California which is clearly the spiritual center of Alcoholics Anonymous at the present time. I live right in the middle of the hive, and Clancy is the Queen Bee. There are speaker meetings(200+ people) all over the area that are modeled after the Pacific Group and strictly tow the party line. Clancy will usually come once a year to share his wisdom and give his blessing, but his living presence is no more needed to perpetuate his creed than the resurrection of Christ is to jump-start Christianity. His mindset is so well ensconced in these satellite meetings which are equipped with a contingent of ruling elders. If one dies out there are a handful ready to take their place. AA is not showing any signs of atrophy here in Southern California as compared with your area . Let's face it, Jesus had only the 12 and Clancy's got hundreds wielding his own purulent version of the 12 Steps. Scary. pachy2@... wrote: > > Hi Apple; > > AA also forces codependent behavior on men if you look at The > Programmed Group as the dominator. I must subvert my will to > The Program's God, do as the program does for the benefit of, not > me, but rather the group, then I must help expand the group and > help it grow to subvert other folks for the benefit of the group. If > after doing these by rote from the book, things go wrong, I must > take the blame. However, if all goes well, credit goes to the > program. > > The programmed Group is in a win/win situation, but I am in a no > win situation, I can never be right, only wrong. > > I think that's almost codependency defined. I must always look out > for the group, our stories show, the group looks out for no one but > itself. I'm speaking of post 1967, prior to that there was help for > individuals in some groups as my own 1966 story shows. > > Oh usually personality cults like Clancy's group has been > described die out after the personality dies, even his assistant > Guru's usually aren't as radical after he dies. The " Little People " > hang on mostly for a touch of the masters robe and when the > master dies, they are lost and wander away. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > FreeShop is the #1 place for free and trial offers and great deals! > Try something new and discover more ways to save! > http://clickhere./click/381 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 , I found AA Hawaiian style is very very much like So. Cal. Is your friend on Oahu? Kathy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Hi Kathy; Yes I believe he is, though he spends most of his time on The Big Island. Seems he lives in Honolulu. I believe that's on Oahu, but have never been to California, except needles on the way home from Laughlin, Nevada some years ago, let alone the islands. I've been in both Canada and Mexico, but to neither coast of The USA. Always thought I'd like to see Boston, but never managed it and probably won't. I've talked with several visitors from California at various Iowa and Arizona, AA groups and none mentioned the conservatism of California. Maybe they were just polite. I seldom saw suits in AA except for business folks at a lunch or breakfast meeting and that was because they didn't want to have to change clothes. However, there was a big feud before my time between Clancy(Judge Ray on) on one side and Shack , Don Nail and two others that resulted in a split in AA in Des Moines. A cult like private meeting called " The West Des Moines Group " was formed by Clancy. It has a membership comittee and if you aren't approved you don't get in. The way they manage this is by changing the meeting place each week. You call them and if you're not approved you get, " Im busy, call you back in a minute " and you never learn the location of the meeting. Constant calling just gets you hung up on. Maybe they make human sacrafices for all I know, never been there. The other guys bought a big old home, built a meeting room on it. The address is 1400 Penn avenue, so they called it The White House. Far as I know, both groups still exist. The West Des Moines meets in folks homes, so probably is fairly small. The white house has around ten thousand members I'd guess, in 18 or so groups. Most of my knowlege of Des Moines is nearly 20 years old, except the other day I came by a meetings list and there were only 20 or 21 groups left in Des Moines, mostly at the White House. It was about 4 years old and listed some groups I knew were defunct because the places no longer exist. Most of the treatment centers are gone, one might be left. Every hospital had one several years ago. 12step treatment is no longer profitable in Iowa because of the policy change in the insurance industry. You have to have good insurance to get in a treatment facility unless court ordered, then The Court system pays, but they just don't do it much due to the cost. You can get the option of treatment only in most cases if your insurance will pay for it. No insurance? Go to Jail, do not pass go, etc. Someone without insurance probably also is without the money for a lawyer who will challenge the system, besides which you've done the time before you can get to court. I've always liked the cartoon of a Lawyer and Client in a jail. The Lawyer asks " How much Due Process can you pay for? " All of which is far off the point. I've known him for three years, but never met F2F. He does still go to meetings now and then though and has never mentioned that the ultra Conservatives were there also. Matter of fact he invited me out there. Maybe he wants to convert me? 8-) Only kidding. I've had my conversion, no more in this lifetime please. He did tell me in California they even advertise " Pure Meeting " I don't think Pure was the word, but a synonym, can't recall, but it meant single addiction only. Guess they just make others unwelcome. Any group like that has a dangerous potential just like The Arayan Nation, The Order et al, they're of a piece. They believe other people are " Less Than " something and that by itself has the potential for deciding the " Less Than's " don't have the right to exist. Trust me, it's not a giant leap in thinking. I hope this Clancy is quite old! The Duke's and Barry Goldwater's of the world, like the Clancy's, scare the devil out of me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 wrote: > Hi Kathy, > > I didn't know Clancy had a daughter, but the big meeting is held in a > huge Synagogue. > > > ------------------------------------ It's really ironic that a huge 12-step meeting would be regularly held in a synagogue, since 12-step philosophy is about as antithetical to the philosophy and traditions of Judaism as you can get. " Humility " , confession, and " getting saved " (having defects and shortcomings removed) by a deity are not Jewish concepts. Neither is the idea that individuality and " self-will " are the root of all evil, or will lead people away from God and/or into " insanity " . Scooping up dogshit to prove your " humility " gets you in " conscious contact with God " ? Weird to the extreme. That people would do such things on some AA guru's orders is frightening. Sounds like this Clancy person might fit the profile of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. ~Rita > BALIHAI333@... wrote: > > > > Was Clancy the guy at University Synagogue in Brentwood??? (LA) I met his > > daughter, or supposed daughter, and she is writing a book that I'm sure must > > be related to her relationship with him. She went on and on when I met her > > but I was unsure how to react. She is here locally. How interesting. Kathy > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 1999 Report Share Posted July 5, 1999 Wot? You werent allowed to say youre gay? hows that for " absolute honesty " ! I remember its still in the the T & T abt how AA doesnt exclude " queers and fallen women " . It's funny how in the pasage of time the word queer has been reclaimed by gay ppl. Pete > I did not take offense at what your " old uncle " said.... In fact, I don't > remember what he said! :.) > > As for Clancy's group, I don't know...but I guess that they probably would > accept gays and atheists (or anyone else) who would play by their rules. In > one of my " home groups " , the rule was that one should never say that he or > she is gay and change their story if necessary to obey this rule. While I do > not have a completely p.c. sense of humor, and can take an occasional gay > joke, keeping my entire life a secret seemed to be contrary to AA philosophy. > In general, the gag rule also applied toward individuals, not just at the > group level. I guess that I never felt the " great relief " of sharing my > story honestly that many members claimed to feel. Now, I don't know how > important this kind of " sharing " is anyway. What do you think? > > Thanks for being thoughtful, though, . I really enjoy your contributions > to this board. > > - Pete Watts Owner PSY-PHAR Psychology/Psychiatry Outcome Research in PsychoPharm PD Personality Disorders Discussion ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 1999 Report Share Posted July 6, 1999 What a bunch of junk they fed us! How could I learn how to live and be any kind of a parent without DOING IT and making some mistakes like I did? Out of the four children I have -only ONE has experienced a serious problem. She was also sexually abused at an early age. I am so sorry to hear that that opportunity was taken away from BOTH you and your daughter. When I began questioning people in AA about THEIR parental and childhood experiences, I realized none of them had had healthy relationships-so how could they possibly tell me what to do? AA does so much damage. I wish you well. Love, >From: Javajenv@... >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: the middle ground?? >Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:17:27 EDT > > >My first sponsor in AA told me that I had no business raising a child when >I >could not even help myself, that she would have all the genetic tendencies >toward alcohol and drug abuse as me , and that this was a selfish program >and >that I needed to put myself first. That was when I was 18. My Daughter has >been raised by my parents ever since, and I took the AA steps to virtual >hell >and I am just getting back now. I am 31 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >GET $10 OFF ANY ORDER @ healthshop.com! No min. purchase req. >Save on vitamins & supplements. Use coupon code: EGROUPS at checkout >http://clickhere./click/432 > > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 1999 Report Share Posted July 6, 1999 What a bunch of junk they fed us! How could I learn how to live and be any kind of a parent without DOING IT and making some mistakes like I did? Out of the four children I have -only ONE has experienced a serious problem. She was also sexually abused at an early age. I am so sorry to hear that that opportunity was taken away from BOTH you and your daughter. When I began questioning people in AA about THEIR parental and childhood experiences, I realized none of them had had healthy relationships-so how could they possibly tell me what to do? AA does so much damage. I wish you well. Love, >From: Javajenv@... >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: the middle ground?? >Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:17:27 EDT > > >My first sponsor in AA told me that I had no business raising a child when >I >could not even help myself, that she would have all the genetic tendencies >toward alcohol and drug abuse as me , and that this was a selfish program >and >that I needed to put myself first. That was when I was 18. My Daughter has >been raised by my parents ever since, and I took the AA steps to virtual >hell >and I am just getting back now. I am 31 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >GET $10 OFF ANY ORDER @ healthshop.com! No min. purchase req. >Save on vitamins & supplements. Use coupon code: EGROUPS at checkout >http://clickhere./click/432 > > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 1999 Report Share Posted July 6, 1999 What a bunch of junk they fed us! How could I learn how to live and be any kind of a parent without DOING IT and making some mistakes like I did? Out of the four children I have -only ONE has experienced a serious problem. She was also sexually abused at an early age. I am so sorry to hear that that opportunity was taken away from BOTH you and your daughter. When I began questioning people in AA about THEIR parental and childhood experiences, I realized none of them had had healthy relationships-so how could they possibly tell me what to do? AA does so much damage. I wish you well. Love, >From: Javajenv@... >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: the middle ground?? >Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:17:27 EDT > > >My first sponsor in AA told me that I had no business raising a child when >I >could not even help myself, that she would have all the genetic tendencies >toward alcohol and drug abuse as me , and that this was a selfish program >and >that I needed to put myself first. That was when I was 18. My Daughter has >been raised by my parents ever since, and I took the AA steps to virtual >hell >and I am just getting back now. I am 31 > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >GET $10 OFF ANY ORDER @ healthshop.com! No min. purchase req. >Save on vitamins & supplements. Use coupon code: EGROUPS at checkout >http://clickhere./click/432 > > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 1999 Report Share Posted July 9, 1999 In a message dated 7/4/99 6:49:43 PM Central Daylight Time, johnhollister@... writes: << The Pacific Group is a cult(over 1500? strong) within a cult, and is presided over by one of AA's most controversial front men. His name is Clancy I. >> Holy Good Goddam! He was my Great-Grandsponsor!! No Joke!! Noel $ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 1999 Report Share Posted July 9, 1999 In a message dated 7/5/99 1:23:03 PM Central Daylight Time, UUSEAN@... writes: << I have heard about the Clancy nonsense. I though the only requirement was a desire not to drink? Dresscodes? I know about gorup autonamy, but I thought that running a cult within AA might affect the fellowship as a whole. I guess not. >> I was in a group that was started by he and his cronies for most of last year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 1999 Report Share Posted July 9, 1999 In a message dated 7/5/99 9:24:54 PM Central Daylight Time, pachy2@... writes: << Any group like that has a dangerous potential just like The Arayan Nation, The Order et al, they're of a piece. They believe other people are " Less Than " something and that by itself has the potential for deciding the " Less Than's " don't have the right to exist. Trust me, it's not a giant leap in thinking. I hope this Clancy is quite old! The Duke's and Barry Goldwater's of the world, like the Clancy's, scare the devil out of me. >> I used to go to " sponsorship meetings " in the Clancy-anointed group I attended. They reminded me of what " Promise-Keeper " meetings might be like. Made me want to fucking puke. (By the way- Duke is truly a thoroughly rotten human being, but what's so bad about Barry Goldwater?) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 1999 Report Share Posted July 10, 1999 hi everyone. first time writer. Pupship, I too was affiliated with Clancy I. and his ilk. The group I was in thrived on the diefication of one man who " sponsored " almost everyone in group. I had my " moment of clarity " last October, when I realized that I was a member of, quite simply, a cult. By January, I stopped attending meetings entirely. That's it. Pupship@... wrote: > > In a message dated 7/4/99 6:49:43 PM Central Daylight Time, > johnhollister@... writes: > > << The Pacific Group is a cult(over 1500? strong) within a cult, and is > presided over by one of AA's most controversial front men. His name is > Clancy I. >> > > Holy Good Goddam! He was my Great-Grandsponsor!! No Joke!! > > Noel $ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Scream your mind > Be as loud as you want at FortuneCity.com > http://clickhere./click/366 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 1999 Report Share Posted July 10, 1999 hi everyone. first time writer. Pupship, I too was affiliated with Clancy I. and his ilk. The group I was in thrived on the diefication of one man who " sponsored " almost everyone in group. I had my " moment of clarity " last October, when I realized that I was a member of, quite simply, a cult. By January, I stopped attending meetings entirely. That's it. Pupship@... wrote: > > In a message dated 7/4/99 6:49:43 PM Central Daylight Time, > johnhollister@... writes: > > << The Pacific Group is a cult(over 1500? strong) within a cult, and is > presided over by one of AA's most controversial front men. His name is > Clancy I. >> > > Holy Good Goddam! He was my Great-Grandsponsor!! No Joke!! > > Noel $ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Scream your mind > Be as loud as you want at FortuneCity.com > http://clickhere./click/366 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 1999 Report Share Posted July 10, 1999 I forgot to mention that my experience with a Clancy influenced group was in nj, which shows how far reaching the cult of Clancy is. It wasn't called Pacific Group East or anything (although there is an Atlantic Group in NYC which I believe is affiliated with Clancy), but Clancy's ideas of Sponsorship were the prevelant force in my group. In October, my group Split into Two because, believe it or not, one follower of Clancy disputed the techniques of the leader/founder of the group, who is also a follower of Clancy. Different lines of Sponsorship. Now there are two groups that are equally sick. And now that I am out of The Cult, I find that I have my own " issues " to deal with; " issues " that I've neglected for a long, long, time. Hunt wrote: > > hi everyone. first time writer. Pupship, I too was affiliated with > Clancy I. and his ilk. The group I was in thrived on the diefication of > one man who " sponsored " almost everyone in group. > > I had my " moment of clarity " last October, when I realized that I was a > member of, quite simply, a cult. By January, I stopped attending > meetings entirely. > > That's it. > > Pupship@... wrote: > > > > In a message dated 7/4/99 6:49:43 PM Central Daylight Time, > > johnhollister@... writes: > > > > << The Pacific Group is a cult(over 1500? strong) within a cult, and is > > presided over by one of AA's most controversial front men. His name is > > Clancy I. >> > > > > Holy Good Goddam! He was my Great-Grandsponsor!! No Joke!! > > > > Noel $ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Scream your mind > > Be as loud as you want at FortuneCity.com > > http://clickhere./click/366 > > > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > > - Simplifying group communications > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get in on the new revolution. The only democratic web community. > Free email. Free webspace at FortuneCity.com. > http://clickhere./click/365 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 1999 Report Share Posted July 10, 1999 I forgot to mention that my experience with a Clancy influenced group was in nj, which shows how far reaching the cult of Clancy is. It wasn't called Pacific Group East or anything (although there is an Atlantic Group in NYC which I believe is affiliated with Clancy), but Clancy's ideas of Sponsorship were the prevelant force in my group. In October, my group Split into Two because, believe it or not, one follower of Clancy disputed the techniques of the leader/founder of the group, who is also a follower of Clancy. Different lines of Sponsorship. Now there are two groups that are equally sick. And now that I am out of The Cult, I find that I have my own " issues " to deal with; " issues " that I've neglected for a long, long, time. Hunt wrote: > > hi everyone. first time writer. Pupship, I too was affiliated with > Clancy I. and his ilk. The group I was in thrived on the diefication of > one man who " sponsored " almost everyone in group. > > I had my " moment of clarity " last October, when I realized that I was a > member of, quite simply, a cult. By January, I stopped attending > meetings entirely. > > That's it. > > Pupship@... wrote: > > > > In a message dated 7/4/99 6:49:43 PM Central Daylight Time, > > johnhollister@... writes: > > > > << The Pacific Group is a cult(over 1500? strong) within a cult, and is > > presided over by one of AA's most controversial front men. His name is > > Clancy I. >> > > > > Holy Good Goddam! He was my Great-Grandsponsor!! No Joke!! > > > > Noel $ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Scream your mind > > Be as loud as you want at FortuneCity.com > > http://clickhere./click/366 > > > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > > - Simplifying group communications > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get in on the new revolution. The only democratic web community. > Free email. Free webspace at FortuneCity.com. > http://clickhere./click/365 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.