Guest guest Posted October 26, 2005 Report Share Posted October 26, 2005 Dear FORUM, I cannot help but wonder how such a bigoted xenophobic and patently racist mail was allowed by the moderator. Deepak Batura E-mail: <d_batura@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Dear Forum, This is my response to the issue raised by Mr. Mohammad Zainal Abedin regarding his apprehension of spreading HIV/AIDS from India to Bangladesh. It has now been globally accepted that the main observed mode of transmission of HIV Virus is sexual intercourse and fundamentally explained by certain behavioral factors, which in turn may vary from one culture to other. However, Mr. Abedin without addressing many local issues aggressively tried to show down Indian solders by calling them `morally bankrupt'. Morality is a relative term and promoting such ethnocentric attitude may escalate the mental unrest of the two neighboring nation-state. The way letter has been written in this forum give the impression that the writer is not sensitive to the issues of sex and sexuality and `sex' seems to be a taboo for him. On the other hand, it seems that Mr. Abedin is quite ignorant of the primary routs through which HIV/AIDS can be spread between the two countries, and tried to camouflage the main issue by unrealistic assumption of how HIV will spared in the Indian subcontinent. Moreover, it seems that without considering the political-economic situation between the countries he raised some illogical argument. I would like to address only few issues raised by Mr. Abedin. It is validated truth that, every year a huge number of underprivileged Bangladeshi women/Girls are either trafficked or illegally migrate two Mumbai. Many of them, in search of servitude, engage themselves into sex trade (Bargirls, floating sex worker etc), in the absence of alternative job opportunities. Moreover, it has also been observed, due to sever competition for clients, they indulge into risky sexual behavior such as non-use of condom. Under this situation, in the absence of prevalence data on the basis of origin of the sex worker, it is not very worthy to feel that STI/HIV prevalence is either high or at least same as similar group of indigenous sex worker population. This foreign-born high-risk group of population maintains a regular relation with their relatives at the place of origin. They visit their native places after a long interval of six-month or a year and stays there for a considerable amount of times. Some times, till the cease of their earnings. Some of these girls have their spouse at the place of origin as well as place of destination. Therefore, the above-mentioned network reflects that how vulnerability of the HIV transmission increases through the routs of illegal migration. At the same time sex is not a booming industry in India but byproduct of post cold war political transition across the globe. The network, which I have mentioned here, is the simplest version of the situation, which reflects putting barriers to `Indian demand for corridor' is neither necessary, nor an issue of concern to put a curb on spread of HIV/AIDS in the Indian subcontinent. The international trade between the two countries has started booming since mid eighties with the opening of Burimari corridor of Rangpur district of Bangladesh. Bangladesh uses this rout two trade with three countries namely Bhutan, India and Nepal. Large volume Bhutan's external trade composed of trade with Bangladesh. It is important to note that, the stones and boulders for the construction of Bangabandhu setu (Yamuna Bridge), which brought communication revaluation in Bangladesh imported from India through this transit rout. Therefore, my point is that in the era of globalization when we are talking of forming `regional blocs' to promote international trade for the mutual benefit of the nations, putting barriers on commuters, traders does not seems to me logical. Moreover, It is not true that Indian truck drivers, helpers and helpers enter Bangladesh illegally. In fact it is only the two people, driver and helper, enters Bangladesh with permission of the respective security authorities of both the countries. The Bangladeshi officials are often delayed them after entering Bangladesh port, on the ground of non-payment of import duties by the Bangladeshi importer. Some times they are held up at Bangladesh for more than 2-3 days. During this phase they left with no money to buy food how they will go for sex. The practical as well as feasible framework would be to create enabling environment for the marginalized section of the society across the country. A joint effort is require preventing trafficking as well as illegal migration. At the same time we should address link poverty eradication program along with anti-trafficking and HIV/AIDS program. I feel at the juncture of we should not encourage medieval values and should try to create a common platform to fight together against this social problem which has a direct relation with the some social problems in the Indian subcontinents such as poverty, inequality, gender norms, illiteracy and so on. Therefore, propagating half truth and promoting taboos and stigma is not a desirable role of any civil society member. Arup Kumar Das E-mail: akd_iips@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.