Guest guest Posted July 20, 1999 Report Share Posted July 20, 1999 I'm going to stop this flooding but you do get the idea that the medical community has many who hide behind degrees. Carol Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 07:23:15 -0400 Reply-To: ADD_MED LIST Addiction Medicine Sender: ADD_MED LIST Addiction Medicine Subject: Re: Knowledge about AA/NA groups To: ADD_MED@... One of the complexities we impose on the utter simplicity of AA is that it can be viewed as a treatment and as an agent of social change, rather than what it is; a fellowship of alcoholics with both a common problem and a common solution. If this were a race, and science were indeed " lagging " behind AA, it would be in not scientifically understanding that spirituality combined with fellowship is a real force for positive change in many people, whether thru religious movements or thru AA. Meanwhile, if anyone wants to get an expanded view of AA as a social movement in a novel way, i recommend these two oldie but goodie books: Fanshen, by Hinton. UofC Berkeley Books. Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, by Jay Lifton, WW Norton. Both books are about the Chinese revolution, a movement i think is very different from European communism, altho i hasten to say i am not an expert on either. The two books present VERY different views of the same phenomenon. Hinton takes the reader into the pastoral scene of a rural village. Lifton intensely interviewed a small number of people who had been brainwashed. Hinton is an agriculturist and author, Lifton a psychiatrist. My own very personal reaction to the books, in hindsight, is that Lifton did an remarkably good, altho unintentional, job of describing key behavioral aspects of the " TC " style of therapeutic community, a la Daytop (my alma mater), while Hinton captured more of the essence of AA (my way of life). peace, john PS I just re-read Lifton's Chapter 23, " Ideological Totalism. " I think i will read it yet again. It and the entire book can be applied without malice to AA as well as TC's, not to denigrate, but to understand. , you might find it interesting. Garber MD wrote: > Jovian: > > I do not know what in particular sparked your vituperative outburst. I too > have a lot of difficulty with the manner in which twelve step dogma seems to > have virtual complete hegemony in recovery circles. That its underpinnings > are purely empirical, at best. But I don't think it is the product of any > conspiracy. It merely reflects the fact that medicine and medical science > have lagged decades behind the lay recovery community in addressing addiction > issues. People with addictions face a far greater conspiracy than could > possibly be engineered by AA, and that is the conspiracy of indifference on > the part of the public, policy makers and the medical community. Your rant is > not without merit. But really, must you shout? > > Garber MD --- Life is a candy store. Visit: Information on recovery alternatives at http://www.bcrecovernet.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.