Guest guest Posted February 11, 2001 Report Share Posted February 11, 2001 Marsh, UAE is still in its " infancy " in many ways,most certainly in Canada it is.I had a very unsuccessful UAE on a uterus that was too big for this sort of intervention.When I ran into complications and got hospitalized twice,everyone sat around with their shoulders shrugged-not a clue.So I would advise caution with new therapies that are not reversible-if you don't like a drug you can ditch it.I have no idea what Nora's motivations are,however,it is possible that she is only hearing from the non-successful UAEs and therefore has formed judgement on that. All possible complications should be thouroghly discussed with both gyn and radiologist ,as you have suggested,including the possibility of hysterectomy should things not work out right.Although the stats may be low,when the stat is YOU its 100% and if you are going through all of this because the end result will be improved quality of life AND avoiding a hysterectopmy then that should,even as I say beit a small percentage,be part of any woman's thinking My 2 cents Best, Bonnie silvrfaux@... wrote: > Hi All, > I noticed American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology > is offering the following course. Are there any > Patient Stakeholders planning to attend? > > <A HREF= " http://www.acog.org/ACM2001/program/pgcourse.cfm?courseid=sa10 " > > Click here: ACOG 50th Anniversary Clinical Meeting -- Uterine Myoma-Rapidly > Emerging Technologies for Treatment</A> > > " ...Ample time has been committed for open discussion, and one of our modules > will discuss the ethics of decision making for myoma therapies.... " > > Refer or not to refer. That is the question? > Marsha > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.