Guest guest Posted December 21, 2002 Report Share Posted December 21, 2002 I take both a beta blocker and a calcium channel blocker, but I found in the beginning that drugs in each group are not all created equal. Even within each class there are variations in effectiveness with different individuals. For example, I initially took Atenolol, beta blocker, but found that Tenormin, its brand name counterpart, was more effective at controlling afib symptoms and preventing afib. When I started Verapamil four years ago, my doctor first prescribed the short acting 80 m.g. pill to be taken three times daily. Then he switched me to Calan, the long acting, time release version. Immediately my afib frequency and intensity worsened. I asked to return to taking the Verapamil short acting tablet three times a day. This is more inconvenient than taking the time release, but in my experience overcoming afib is all about inconvenience and worse. Supposedly Calan and Verapamil are the same drugs as are Atenolol and Tenormin, but for this afibber they had very different effects. I take the drugs which are most effective for me, even if they cost more. in sinus in Seattle (15 minutes of afib in 213 days of straight sinus) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2002 Report Share Posted December 21, 2002 I take both a beta blocker and a calcium channel blocker, but I found in the beginning that drugs in each group are not all created equal. Even within each class there are variations in effectiveness with different individuals. For example, I initially took Atenolol, beta blocker, but found that Tenormin, its brand name counterpart, was more effective at controlling afib symptoms and preventing afib. When I started Verapamil four years ago, my doctor first prescribed the short acting 80 m.g. pill to be taken three times daily. Then he switched me to Calan, the long acting, time release version. Immediately my afib frequency and intensity worsened. I asked to return to taking the Verapamil short acting tablet three times a day. This is more inconvenient than taking the time release, but in my experience overcoming afib is all about inconvenience and worse. Supposedly Calan and Verapamil are the same drugs as are Atenolol and Tenormin, but for this afibber they had very different effects. I take the drugs which are most effective for me, even if they cost more. in sinus in Seattle (15 minutes of afib in 213 days of straight sinus) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2002 Report Share Posted December 21, 2002 Trudy and Others.. Go to www.medcohealth.com and choose Drug Information. Then do a seach on calcium channel blockers. Gives a wide array of info on advantages and disadvantages and comparisons to beta blockers. btw: I was on calcium channel blocker (cardizem) at first and beta blocker was added in early evenings to control flutters. Finally coming off of cardizem (1 day, no problems so far) since I'm on tikosyn. Side effects of cardizem are, IMO, way worse than toprol if toprol is taken in the evenings when drowsiness is not as bad of a problem. Cheryl <snip> >...what factors determine which of these meds to take? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2002 Report Share Posted December 21, 2002 Trudy and Others.. Go to www.medcohealth.com and choose Drug Information. Then do a seach on calcium channel blockers. Gives a wide array of info on advantages and disadvantages and comparisons to beta blockers. btw: I was on calcium channel blocker (cardizem) at first and beta blocker was added in early evenings to control flutters. Finally coming off of cardizem (1 day, no problems so far) since I'm on tikosyn. Side effects of cardizem are, IMO, way worse than toprol if toprol is taken in the evenings when drowsiness is not as bad of a problem. Cheryl <snip> >...what factors determine which of these meds to take? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2002 Report Share Posted December 21, 2002 I am very interested in this subject too. My cardiologist put me on a calcium blocker from the beginning, and it is not clear why. My afib is there constantly, but not so severe as most........chronic/persistent. Harry calcium channel blockers vs. beta blockers > The question about calcium channel blockers reminds me of something I > meant to ask. > > When I was first diagnosed with afib, my internist put me on a > calcium channel bocker. The cardiologist changed that to a beta > blocker. > > I felt much better on the beta blocker, but that may have been > because of the effect it has of reducing anxiety. > > I am wondering what factors determine which of these meds to take? > Possibly a calcium channel blocker would help without the lethargy > effects of a beta blocker? > > > > > Web Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport > FAQ - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/files/Administrative/faq.htm > For more information: http://www.dialsolutions.com/af > Unsubscribe: AFIBsupport-unsubscribe > List owner: AFIBsupport-owner > For help on how to use the group, including how to drive it via email, > send a blank email to AFIBsupport-help > > Nothing in this message should be considered as medical advice, or should be acted upon without consultation with one's physician. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.