Dr. Ksokolski, Jean KeeL DDI URINE TEST

[Guest guest]

Subject: Fwd: lead in pre-industrial humans/proper levels?

Although I usually agree with Dr. Cutler on many things, in some

thoughts and areas I do NOT. (who would guess?) I think that your 11

year old sons toxic metals range is terrible, and with GREAT meaning.

There is a problem. I called UC Santa Cruz, and asked them to find

bones from before we made toxic metals a household word. I was thinking

animal bones. They did me one better, they dug up an old American

Indian. When the bones were tested just for lead the results are very

telling. The " ACCEPTABLE " levels of toxic metal LEAD poisoning are

meaningless. Look at how little the bones in the graph have lead in

them for the American Indian. Poor guy died never knowing that he did

NOT have the proper and acceptable HIGH level of lead. Click on the URL

at the bottom of this post read the article, and you can begin to

understand HOW BADLY WE HAVE CONTAMINATED OURSELVES, and our children.

There is no level at which toxic metals do not cause damage. Dr.

Ksokolski I am GLAD to have you HERE, PLEASE STAY! ltldab1@

juno.com

Subject: lead in preindustrial humans Click on below URL

In the second paragraph you can see the current Lead levels

allowed

in humans, and what seals in a remote site away from industrial

pollution

currently have in them. (much lower than us) I thought it was

very

interesting that pre-industrial Human bones in America have such a low

level of Lead. You should keep these levels in mind when your QUACK

IDIOT doKtor or dentKist tells you that your Toxic Metals levels are

Fine, and that nothing can go wrong. Also ask for a thimerosal

Vitimin

M mercury booster shot if your levels approach to low or an

unacceptable

level? THERE IS NO LEVEL AT WHICH TOXIC METALS DO NOT CAUSE

DAMAGE!

period ltldab1@ juno.com (this URL may take a while to

load all the pictures)

http://ic.ucsc.edu/~flegal/etox80e/SpecTopics/Lead/

--- End forwarded message ---