Guest guest Posted October 22, 1999 Report Share Posted October 22, 1999 , In my humble opinion, based on what you have told us here, seeing this doctor would be a waste of your time. I'm not saying that it isn't possible that has Leigh's and the MRI changes just haven't shown up yet. However, any doctor who will make a blanket statement like that with so little information is bordering on incompetent and is obviously not informed about mitochondrial disorders in general. Again, just my opinion. Terri > >Reply-To: Mitoonelist >To: Mitoonelist >Subject: Disturbing conversation with doctor >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 15:10:38 -0700 > > >Hi all. I hope I am still subscribed to this list. Haven't had any >messages lately. > >At any rate, I had a brief conversation with the geneticist who is to see > next Friday at Children's >in D.C. She is a last resort because the doctors at Kennedy Kreiger aren't >seeing anyone new. >Nontheless, when I briefly described 's symptoms (pale optic nerves, >nystagmus, developmental delay) >she said that whenever you have neurological symptoms such as those the >clinical diagnosis is always >Leighs disease. I almost passed out! My son's MRI was negative and I >guess I was under the assumption >that you could have neurological symptoms without necessarily having >Leighs. This woman now makes me feel >that my son is going to die based on symptoms and no lab evidence. Is it >just me, or is she crazy? I >haven't been on this list very long, but it occurs to me that there are >lots of folks on this list who >have some neurological symptoms but don't have Leighs. > >This really makes me nervous about taking him down to Children's next week. > I have never been happy with >the doctors down there, and now I'm really down on them. > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those >affected by mitochondrial disease. ><< text3.html >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 1999 Report Share Posted October 22, 1999 lauren; this doesn't seem right to me... of course, i am no expert, but how can anyone say that certain symptoms " always " mean a certain disease, without any concrete evidence to back it up? this doesn't sound very accurate to me. my son orion's symptoms were neurological, and although his initial diagnosis was leigh's, they later found that it was not what he had at all. his mito was caused by his FEL. (i am not saying your child has FEL, just that orion didn't have leigh's...) is there any other dr at all that you can go to? what area are you in? is there any way you can find a dr that you feel comfortable with? i think that if it were me, i would always be wondering about the accuracy of the info this dr is giving... julia orion's mommy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 1999 Report Share Posted October 22, 1999 Steve, I am the mother of an 11 year old girl that was diagnosed with Complex IV many years ago. She has had lesions on her MRI since she was 11 months old and has had many neurological symptoms, although not the changes in retina. She does not have leigh's disease. I am relatively certain that you can have all the symptoms that you described and then some, and not have leigh's disease. Leigh's disease is actually not easily diagnosed and a diagnosis of leigh's disease is usually made when there are specific lesions on certain parts of the brain. I've really never heard of anyone having a normal MRI and getting a diagnosis of Leigh's. Maybe someone else can clarify that for you, but I've never heard of it before. Also the symptoms that you describe are pretty typical of a lot of mito disorders, so I'm not sure how this doc can be that positive over the phone that your son has leigh's vs. any number other mito diseases. I'd be a little bit nervous about going there too. Doesn't sound to me like they are very well versed in mito. One mistake that I have seen happen many times, is that Leigh's is diagnosed because it is one of the more " famous " or well known mito diseases. A diagnosis of Leigh's is actually very difficult to prove, since the confirmation of spongeform lesions that are characteristic of Leigh's disease, can only be identified through brain biopsy or autopsy. Hang in there, Jeannine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 1999 Report Share Posted October 22, 1999 lauren; although orion did not exactly have optic atrophy, he did have optic disc hypoplasia, which is underdevelopment of the optic nerves. they never developed correctly to begin with; they were extremely small, and pale. because of this, he was blind, and his vision was not correctable. (i still insist that he was not completely blind-- the drs say he could see only light and movement-- nothing more.) i know this isn't the same thing as optic atrophy, but it is similar. some of his symptoms included: brain atrophy; optic disc hypoplasia; seizures; brain lesions; brain hemorrhaging (caused by the atrophy); consistant vomiting; reflux; tremors; apnea; bradycardia; hearing loss; FTT; muscle stiffness; muscle weakness; hair loss; extreme irritability; among many other things... by the way, these are the things that we knew of while he was still here; they have found many other things from the autopsy-- which still isn't back yet. julia orion's mommy forever september 18, 1998 to february 3, 1999 mito disorder caused by familial erythrophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis " some people only dream of angels; we held one in our arms! " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 , I am so sorry you are feeling sad. I understand and wish I could help. Please know that we care and hope you can look forward to more positive answers that will bring a little cheer to your life. This must be so hard .... It hurts so much to see so many little ones suffering because of this disease. Our only hope is to keep working on the doctors to become more well informed and the pharmacutical companys to take an interest and find a cure. Alice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 In a message dated 99-10-22 15:19:59 EDT, you write: > A diagnosis of Leigh's is > actually very difficult to prove, since the confirmation of spongeform > lesions that are characteristic of Leigh's disease, can only be > identified through brain biopsy or autopsy. > Jeannine (and all) If you can find the time would you mind sharing more information specifically in regards to " brain biopsy " info??? This has been mentioned in an " off handed " manner by an " X " -geneticist of ours, he has since left Vanderbuilt Children's Hospital. How intense is this surgery .., recovery time, how long is the " wait " time before information starts coming in ..that sort of stuff. Thank you all so much for being " here " ..it's hell on earth not knowing what " it " is that my boys have but it's defiantely been easier to deal with since meeting " you all " . TTYS 10-22-99 21:08Take care and best wishes from an Elf in TN...Romona mom to Tori (age 11, nda ~ 5th grade inclusion), Zach (age 9, multichallenged : acquired nystagmus, strubismus (surgically corrected), excema, chronic sinusitus, Upper Resp disease, ataxia, hypotonia, progressive hypertonia, dev. delays (globally), seizures (treated with Tegretol and " outgrown " by age 6), mild stuttering, oral motor/swallow issues, clonus presenting in right leg only, megaColon~delayed emptying GI issues, ~3rd grade ERC program), Cory (age 7, multichallenged ditto on Zach's with the exception of GI issues and has not had the estopia-like condition surgically corrected~ 1st grade ERC but currently awaiting M-team to discuss 1:1 aide for full inclusion in reg. edu. classroom) and wife to Tony (my hero) http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/Elf808/index.html http://pages.hotbot.com/family/elf808/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 I agree that it is wrong for her to make a statement like that. I must say, however, that she does have all of 's lab work results and doctor's records and is in contact with his neurologist. Therefore, I feel somehow that they all must have " decided " that has Leighs behind closed doors, based upon his symptoms and his symptoms alone. My guess is that a second MRI right now would show lesions. My real curiosity here is whether others have experienced the same symptoms without having Leigh's. I have heard of the ataxia and nystagmus with other mito diseases, but not the optic atrophy. Another thing that bothers me is that we went to see the opthomologist who saw originally (not Repka but another lady). Now she tells me that 's nerves " were " pink the first time she saw him, then a month later they were pale. She says they have not changed since that second visit a year ago. This makes me furious because she had written a report to me and the other doctors that, after examining him the second time, she did not see any progression. None of the other doctors have seen a progression either, but that is probably because it all happened in that first month then stabalized. I could just kill that doctor. My mother says she probably just thought they were pink at first and changed her opinion later because all of the other doctors disagreed with her. Who knows. I'm just so sad I want to die. Terri Mason wrote: > > > , > > In my humble opinion, based on what you have told us here, seeing this > doctor would be a waste of your time. I'm not saying that it isn't possible > that has Leigh's and the MRI changes just haven't shown up yet. > However, any doctor who will make a blanket statement like that with so > little information is bordering on incompetent and is obviously not informed > about mitochondrial disorders in general. > > Again, just my opinion. > > Terri > > > > >Reply-To: Mitoonelist > >To: Mitoonelist > >Subject: Disturbing conversation with doctor > >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 15:10:38 -0700 > > > > > >Hi all. I hope I am still subscribed to this list. Haven't had any > >messages lately. > > > >At any rate, I had a brief conversation with the geneticist who is to see > > next Friday at Children's > >in D.C. She is a last resort because the doctors at Kennedy Kreiger aren't > >seeing anyone new. > >Nontheless, when I briefly described 's symptoms (pale optic nerves, > >nystagmus, developmental delay) > >she said that whenever you have neurological symptoms such as those the > >clinical diagnosis is always > >Leighs disease. I almost passed out! My son's MRI was negative and I > >guess I was under the assumption > >that you could have neurological symptoms without necessarily having > >Leighs. This woman now makes me feel > >that my son is going to die based on symptoms and no lab evidence. Is it > >just me, or is she crazy? I > >haven't been on this list very long, but it occurs to me that there are > >lots of folks on this list who > >have some neurological symptoms but don't have Leighs. > > > >This really makes me nervous about taking him down to Children's next week. > > I have never been happy with > >the doctors down there, and now I'm really down on them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those > >affected by mitochondrial disease. > ><< text3.html >> > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 Ramona, A brain biopsy is, from what I understand, not an easy procedure. It was suggested at one time for Caitlin, and our docs felt that it wasn't worth the risks. That's really all I know about it. I'm not sure that it would be a viable thing just to prove a diagnosis of Leigh's. Elf808@... wrote: > Jeannine (and all) > If you can find the time would you mind sharing more information > specifically in regards to " brain biopsy " info??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 We live between Washington, D.C. and Baltimore. My first choice for doctors is always s Hopkins/Kennedy Kreiger. But apparently that is also everyone else's first choice, and Kennedy Kreiger is very difficult to get in. I did send 's info to Dr. Kelley, and he promised he'd review it and call me, but said that he isn't seeing any more patients (right now he has 50 mito kids alone, not to mention all the other genetic patients). I do have a little pull, as a good friend of ours works for the Chairman of Genetics at Cedars Sinai. She had the Chairman place a personal call to Dr. Kelley yesterday and he said that, after looking over 's records, he might agree to see him as a patient. I am keeping my fingers crossed. The doctor we are planning to see next week is at Children's in D.C. No offense to them, I am sure others have had great experiences there. Personally, we have had horrible luck with them. The doctors have been either extremely negative or extremely apathetic. They have lost my son's blood work three times in the past year (taken blood for tests then somehow forgot to order the test...who knows where the blood went). They ordered the wrong test two times and never called to tell me about it. My son has been accidentally tested by Children's for Fragile X four times and for Very Long Chain Fatty acids twice. The lab technicians who took my son's blood were terrible. One guy broke the vial of blood as he was drawing it from 's arm and the blood went everywhere. Then he forgot to put a cotton ball on the puncture and my son's arm was squirting blood all over. Please, no offense to anyone who works there or has had good experiences there. It's just that, for some reason, we haven't had good luck at that place. Jaz739@... wrote: > From: Jaz739@... > > lauren; > this doesn't seem right to me... of course, i am no expert, but how > can anyone say that certain symptoms " always " mean a certain disease, without > any concrete evidence to back it up? this doesn't sound very accurate to me. > my son orion's symptoms were neurological, and although his initial > diagnosis was leigh's, they later found that it was not what he had at all. > his mito was caused by his FEL. (i am not saying your child has FEL, just > that orion didn't have leigh's...) > is there any other dr at all that you can go to? what area are you in? > is there any way you can find a dr that you feel comfortable with? i think > that if it were me, i would always be wondering about the accuracy of the > info this dr is giving... > julia > orion's mommy > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 In a message dated 10/22/1999 3:09:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, sfitzger@... writes: > when I briefly described 's symptoms (pale optic nerves, > nystagmus, developmental delay) > she said that whenever you have neurological symptoms such as those the > clinical diagnosis is always > Leighs disease. Steve, when I read this, the accent seemed to be on the word " clinical. " Is a clinical diagnosis different from other types of diagnosis? Maybe the diagnosis arrived at on the basis of presented symptoms as opposed to testing? I have several diagnoses based on various criteria, but the biopsy showed something else altogether. I'm not an MD, so do check it out. the Elder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 In a message dated 10/22/99 8:46:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, sfitzger@... writes: << did send 's info to Dr. Kelley, and he promised he'd review it and call me, but said that he isn't seeing any more patients (right now he has 50 mito kids alone, not to mention all the other genetic patients). I do have a little pull, as a good friend of ours works for the Chairman of Genetics at Cedars Sinai. She had the Chairman place a personal call to Dr. Kelley yesterday and he said that, after looking over 's records, he might agree to see him as a patient >> : I will keep my fingers crossed. Dr. Kelley is an amazing man. We met him when Clayton was inpatient at KKI for 9 weeks and that is when he gave us the diagnosis. We just had a follow up with him a week ago. He was with us for over 2 hours and answered all our questions and is just a great doctor and so caring. Hope that you can get to seehim. Love, sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 Yes, the accent was on " clinical diagnosis, " meaning based upon the observed symptoms and nothing else, since all lab work is negative. Of course he could still have something that isn't even mitochondrial at all, such as neuroaxonal dystrophy. My concern is that, over the last three months, has seemed to go from terrific (the best he's ever been) to not understanding a word anyone says, going around the house grunting and blinking, in his own little world. I guess I shouldn't have mentioned this to the doctor, as she is putting it into the picture without even having seen him yet. Arrants@... wrote: > From: Arrants@... > > In a message dated 10/22/1999 3:09:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > sfitzger@... writes: > > > when I briefly described 's symptoms (pale optic nerves, > > nystagmus, developmental delay) > > she said that whenever you have neurological symptoms such as those the > > clinical diagnosis is always > > Leighs disease. > > Steve, when I read this, the accent seemed to be on the word " clinical. " Is a > clinical diagnosis different from other types of diagnosis? Maybe the > diagnosis arrived at on the basis of presented symptoms as opposed to > testing? I have several diagnoses based on various criteria, but the biopsy > showed something else altogether. I'm not an MD, so do check it out. > > the Elder > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 " Caring! " That is definitely the kind of doctor we want. I could tell from my telephone conversation with Dr. Kelley that he was kind and optimistic and very, very smart. I just can't deal with these other doctors who are so down and so clinical. The neurologist at Children's who saw in August had the nerve to say to me, " Well, if you find out he is going to die you'll go home, cry, and you'll get over it. " I just couldn't believe how cold that was. Yes, I will go home and cry, but I won't GET OVER IT. Sometimes I feel that doctors look at parents of sick kids and just can't seem to put themselves in their shoes. Particularly when they have perfectly healthy kids of their own. It's as if they have a right to be patronizing because they are the experts and we are just the stupid, helpless parents who bore imperfect children. As if somehow this is our fault and we should be prepared to face the consequences. Yes, please do keep your fingers crossed about Dr. Kelley. He is definitely the man for us. SDidinsky@... wrote: > From: SDidinsky@... > > In a message dated 10/22/99 8:46:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > sfitzger@... writes: > > << did send 's info to Dr. Kelley, and he promised he'd review it > and call me, but said that he isn't seeing any more patients (right now he > has 50 mito kids alone, not to > mention all the other genetic patients). I do have a little pull, as a good > friend of ours works for the > Chairman of Genetics at Cedars Sinai. She had the Chairman place a personal > call to Dr. Kelley yesterday > and he said that, after looking over 's records, he might agree to see > him as a patient >> > > : > > I will keep my fingers crossed. Dr. Kelley is an amazing man. We met him when > Clayton was inpatient at KKI for 9 weeks and that is when he gave us the > diagnosis. We just had a follow up with him a week ago. He was with us for > over 2 hours and answered all our questions and is just a great doctor and so > caring. Hope that you can get to seehim. > > Love, > sharon > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 1999 Report Share Posted October 23, 1999 " Caring! " That is definitely the kind of doctor we want. I could tell from my telephone conversation with Dr. Kelley that he was kind and optimistic and very, very smart. I just can't deal with these other doctors who are so down and so clinical. The neurologist at Children's who saw in August had the nerve to say to me, " Well, if you find out he is going to die you'll go home, cry, and you'll get over it. " I just couldn't believe how cold that was. Yes, I will go home and cry, but I won't GET OVER IT. Sometimes I feel that doctors look at parents of sick kids and just can't seem to put themselves in their shoes. Particularly when they have perfectly healthy kids of their own. It's as if they have a right to be patronizing because they are the experts and we are just the stupid, helpless parents who bore imperfect children. As if somehow this is our fault and we should be prepared to face the consequences. Yes, please do keep your fingers crossed about Dr. Kelley. He is definitely the man for us. SDidinsky@... wrote: > From: SDidinsky@... > > In a message dated 10/22/99 8:46:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > sfitzger@... writes: > > << did send 's info to Dr. Kelley, and he promised he'd review it > and call me, but said that he isn't seeing any more patients (right now he > has 50 mito kids alone, not to > mention all the other genetic patients). I do have a little pull, as a good > friend of ours works for the > Chairman of Genetics at Cedars Sinai. She had the Chairman place a personal > call to Dr. Kelley yesterday > and he said that, after looking over 's records, he might agree to see > him as a patient >> > > : > > I will keep my fingers crossed. Dr. Kelley is an amazing man. We met him when > Clayton was inpatient at KKI for 9 weeks and that is when he gave us the > diagnosis. We just had a follow up with him a week ago. He was with us for > over 2 hours and answered all our questions and is just a great doctor and so > caring. Hope that you can get to seehim. > > Love, > sharon > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 , Being " clinically " diagnosed with Leigh's as I understand it means that a person has a certain set of symptoms that are usually associated with the disease. It is possible to have Leigh's and have a normal MRI. But Leigh's is a broad term that does not speak to the specific type of defect. There is an excellent review of an article by S. Rahman, et al. on Leigh's--I believe it is available on the UMDF web site. Of the children participating in the study, 12% had a normal CT/MRI. IF (and it is a big if) does have Leigh's, it is not a death sentence. Kids are living much, much longer and healthier lives than they used to. Just a little added info... , Mom to Adelaine and Baby ? -- The s , , Adelaine and Baby? Ann Arbor, MI http://www.mich/com/~jaj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 Hi . My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 Hi . My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 Hi . My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 Hi. I looked at the article you mentioned. I have seen this before. has only 6 of the symptoms on the list: developmental delay, nystagmus, optic atrophy, hypotonia, ataxia, absent reflexes. He does not have an increased lactate level, seizures, etc. The prognosis he gives is very pessimistic regarding life expectancy. However, it would probably be better if has this disorder than some of the others they are considering. Guess we'll see in time. Thanks, The 's wrote: > > > , > > Being " clinically " diagnosed with Leigh's as I understand it > means that a person has a certain set of symptoms that are > usually associated with the disease. It is possible to have > Leigh's and have a normal MRI. But Leigh's is a broad term > that does not speak to the specific type of defect. There > is an excellent review of an article by S. Rahman, et al. on > Leigh's--I believe it is available on the UMDF web site. Of > the children participating in the study, 12% had a normal > CT/MRI. > > IF (and it is a big if) does have Leigh's, it is not a > death sentence. Kids are living much, much longer and > healthier lives than they used to. > > Just a little added info... > > , Mom to Adelaine and Baby ? > > -- > The s > , , Adelaine and Baby? > Ann Arbor, MI > http://www.mich/com/~jaj > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 Hi. I looked at the article you mentioned. I have seen this before. has only 6 of the symptoms on the list: developmental delay, nystagmus, optic atrophy, hypotonia, ataxia, absent reflexes. He does not have an increased lactate level, seizures, etc. The prognosis he gives is very pessimistic regarding life expectancy. However, it would probably be better if has this disorder than some of the others they are considering. Guess we'll see in time. Thanks, The 's wrote: > > > , > > Being " clinically " diagnosed with Leigh's as I understand it > means that a person has a certain set of symptoms that are > usually associated with the disease. It is possible to have > Leigh's and have a normal MRI. But Leigh's is a broad term > that does not speak to the specific type of defect. There > is an excellent review of an article by S. Rahman, et al. on > Leigh's--I believe it is available on the UMDF web site. Of > the children participating in the study, 12% had a normal > CT/MRI. > > IF (and it is a big if) does have Leigh's, it is not a > death sentence. Kids are living much, much longer and > healthier lives than they used to. > > Just a little added info... > > , Mom to Adelaine and Baby ? > > -- > The s > , , Adelaine and Baby? > Ann Arbor, MI > http://www.mich/com/~jaj > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 1999 Report Share Posted October 24, 1999 , I cannot go go to Kennedy Kreiger because innsurance will not cover. However my Dr. @ Hershey Med Center in Pa calls him and get his input for us. I think I'd be changing DR's but I can relate. Children's AHospital in Philadelphia held up resuts for 9 months before I called thinking everything was- well good luck -keep searching. We also have had so many times that blood was given the wrong test or broken or coded wrong. This last summer our Dr. herself drew the blood so no mistakes occurres and guess what-who knows it was never tested. So frustrating when I need 8 people to hold him down. Is their another teaching hospital you can go too?I wish I could go to Dr. Kelley directly. But need to be satisfied that my Dr. or another collegue of hers can. I'd be mad too if I were you Kathy F. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 1999 Report Share Posted October 25, 1999 I know that the MRI lesions are pretty often diagnostic of Leigh's, but 's MRI is completely normal. My son is only mildly hypotonic. He can walk several steps and is VERY strong. It scares me because baby #2 is due in June and I worry that it will have the same disorder. Have they done muscle biopsies on your children? Believe it or not, when my son first developed nystagmus a year ago, I went to the geneticist and asked her if my son could possibly have Leigh's. She said that only girls get that disease. How STUPID! Again, Children's Hospital in D.C. My son does seem to be regressing mentally, at least over the past three months. When he was a baby he was considered cognitively advanced. At 17 months, when he started his Early Intervention Program, they tested him at the 3-year-old developmental level for cognitive skills! Now he seems to be at the level of a 15 month old, intellectually. I don't know if this is really mental deterioration, or due to the onset of autistic tendencies, which leaves him with one foot in this world and one foot out. Guess I'll let you all know what they say on Friday. I'm really scared. Take care, Sue & Jack wrote: > > > Hi . > My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs > still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess > given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to > cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid > levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist > yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in > the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than > the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They > do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they > have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just > move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at > them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same > thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are > both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the > reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life > expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people > whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all > depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys > having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much > faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One > thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be > harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " > anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live > a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having > it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... > > Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV > Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker > -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach > tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 1999 Report Share Posted October 25, 1999 I know that the MRI lesions are pretty often diagnostic of Leigh's, but 's MRI is completely normal. My son is only mildly hypotonic. He can walk several steps and is VERY strong. It scares me because baby #2 is due in June and I worry that it will have the same disorder. Have they done muscle biopsies on your children? Believe it or not, when my son first developed nystagmus a year ago, I went to the geneticist and asked her if my son could possibly have Leigh's. She said that only girls get that disease. How STUPID! Again, Children's Hospital in D.C. My son does seem to be regressing mentally, at least over the past three months. When he was a baby he was considered cognitively advanced. At 17 months, when he started his Early Intervention Program, they tested him at the 3-year-old developmental level for cognitive skills! Now he seems to be at the level of a 15 month old, intellectually. I don't know if this is really mental deterioration, or due to the onset of autistic tendencies, which leaves him with one foot in this world and one foot out. Guess I'll let you all know what they say on Friday. I'm really scared. Take care, Sue & Jack wrote: > > > Hi . > My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs > still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess > given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to > cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid > levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist > yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in > the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than > the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They > do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they > have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just > move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at > them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same > thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are > both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the > reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life > expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people > whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all > depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys > having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much > faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One > thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be > harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " > anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live > a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having > it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... > > Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV > Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker > -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach > tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 1999 Report Share Posted October 25, 1999 I know that the MRI lesions are pretty often diagnostic of Leigh's, but 's MRI is completely normal. My son is only mildly hypotonic. He can walk several steps and is VERY strong. It scares me because baby #2 is due in June and I worry that it will have the same disorder. Have they done muscle biopsies on your children? Believe it or not, when my son first developed nystagmus a year ago, I went to the geneticist and asked her if my son could possibly have Leigh's. She said that only girls get that disease. How STUPID! Again, Children's Hospital in D.C. My son does seem to be regressing mentally, at least over the past three months. When he was a baby he was considered cognitively advanced. At 17 months, when he started his Early Intervention Program, they tested him at the 3-year-old developmental level for cognitive skills! Now he seems to be at the level of a 15 month old, intellectually. I don't know if this is really mental deterioration, or due to the onset of autistic tendencies, which leaves him with one foot in this world and one foot out. Guess I'll let you all know what they say on Friday. I'm really scared. Take care, Sue & Jack wrote: > > > Hi . > My kids only have a few of the symptoms of Leigh's too, yet the docs > still seem pretty sure. Not positive, but I think it's their best guess > given the symptoms. None of the specific DNA defects that are known to > cause Leigh's has been found. My kids don't generally have high lactic acid > levels, optic nerve atrophy (of course we haven't been to the ophthamologist > yet this year) nor do they have seizures. But they do have the lesions in > the Thalamus and I guess that is a pretty good indicator. Really other than > the MRI results everything else is normal (with regard to lab work). They > do have nystagmus. I never ever noticed it before but the docs said they > have it. Of course now it's getting bad. Some days their eyes will just > move from side to side in a smooth manner. It's really scarey looking at > them. They can't control it at all. And sometimes does the same > thing with his whole head. It will like twitch back and forth. They are > both severely hypotonic, developmental delay, and I don't know about the > reflexes. They don't have ataxia, but are dystonic. I know the life > expectancy throws you, but don't let it take over. I have talked to people > whose kids died at 2 months old and others who are in their teens. It all > depends on the amount of mitochondria affected. Even with both the boys > having this their severity is so different. has regressed so much > faster than Chris. However, is now starting to regress a bit. One > thing that has never regressed though is their intelligence. It may be > harder for them to talk and communicate now, but they have not " lost " > anything. I'm sure I didn't cheer you up any , but it is possible to live > a good life knowing your kids have this disease. Or are suspected of having > it. It can only be 100% diagnosed post mortem. Good luck... > > Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV > Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker > -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach > tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb > > > Brought to you by www.imdn.org - an on-line support group for those affected by mitochondrial disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 1999 Report Share Posted October 25, 1999 Hi , had a skin and muscle biopsy done and they came back normal. That's what I mean about the kids, it's like they have a mito disorder but they don't. Other than the physical regressing, they are pretty healthy. They don't seem to have a problem metabolizing anything and they don't have lactic acid problems. It's very confusing! I know you're scared, I've been there. Try to hang in there until Friday and do let us know what's up. I will keep you in my thoughts. Sue ( & Jack)-worn out parents to the greatest kids on earth in Las Vegas, NV Chris-9: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker -8: Leigh's Disease (?), MR (mild), hypotonia, non-walker/talker, trach tube (larynotracheomalasia), g-tube/fundo Visit us! http://u2.lvcm.com/jscb > I know that the MRI lesions are pretty often diagnostic of Leigh's, but 's MRI is completely >cares me because baby #2 is due in June and I worry that it will have the same disorder. Have >they done muscle biopsies on your children? > > Believe it or not, when my son first developed nystagmus a year ago, I went to the geneticist and >asked her if my son could possibly have Leigh's. She said that only girls get that disease. How >STUPID! Again, Children's Hospital in D.C. My son does seem to be regressing mentally, at least >over the past three months. When he was a baby he was considered cognitively advanced. At 17 >months, when he started his Early Intervention Program, they tested him at the 3-year-old >developmental level for cognitive skills! Now he seems to be at the level of a 15 month old, >intellectually. I don't know if this is really mental deterioration, or due to the onset of autistic >tendencies, which leaves him with one foot in this world and one foot out. > > Guess I'll let you all know what they say on Friday. I'm really scared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.