Guest guest Posted January 31, 2011 Report Share Posted January 31, 2011 NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Jan 26 - Diet and exercise interventions to reduce obesity may not help stave off disease since people tend to gain the weight back, according to a new Australian report. Published in the January International Journal of Obesity, Dr. Lennert Veerman and colleagues note the focus of such programs may need to change if they're really going to have a lasting effect. To test the potential impact of different diets, the researchers ran two computer simulations on an overweight and obese population in 2003: One included a low-fat diet, the other a diet rich in whole grains and vegetables plus 180 minutes of exercise per week. Outcome measures were disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and proportions of disease burden avoided. According to the models, people lost an average of 8 to 12 pounds on the diets and kept the weight off for an average of 6 months. But the pounds slowly crept back on, and after less than 6 years, the dieters were back where they started -- negating any improvement in health from the weight loss. In addition, the researchers estimate that only about 3% of Australia's population would participate in weight-loss programs. " Interventions that try to change the behavior of individuals but do nothing about the environment in which these people live, are likely to have modest and temporary effects at best, " said Dr. Veerman of the University of Queensland in Brisbane. " They are not the solution for the obesity epidemic -- more, and different, interventions have to be taken, " he added in an e-mail to Reuters Health. Along with continued counseling to help people keep weight off long-term, Dr. Veerman suggests a 'junk food tax' and better nutrition labeling. These did seem to have an overall positive effect on health in a parallel study, published in November in the same journal. In the US, 73% of adults are overweight or obese, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the surgeon general, the annual cost of obesity is $117 billion in the US, including health care spending and lost productivity. " We understand that weight loss programs that we have now are really helpful for individuals, " said Dr. Hollie Raynor, associate professor of nutrition at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, who was not involved in the study. " But the challenge seems to be, how do we help individuals maintain this weight loss over time? " Dr. Veerman concluded, " the fact that not everybody (who's) overweight wants to, or can, participate reduces its overall effect on the overweight-related burden of disease in the population. " *International Journal of Obesity*. Posted online January 11, 2011. Abstract<http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ijo2010246a.html> LINK at medscape.com -- Ortiz, MS, RD *The FRUGAL Dietitian* <http://www.thefrugaldietitian.com> Check out my blog: mixture of deals and nutrition Ebates: JCPenney 6% cashback 1/31 + free ship to store +15% off code<http://thefrugaldietitian.com/?p=13653>Eversave: 1/31/11 – Sign up for $5 in your account<http://thefrugaldietitian.com/?p=13678>Tip for Healthy Eating and Losing Weight<http://thefrugaldietitian.com/?p=13497> ** <http://thefrugaldietitian.com/?p=12001><http://thefrugaldietitian.com/?p=10437>\ " Nutrition is a science, Not an Opinion survey " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.