Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Thank you

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

,

I extend to you my deepest sympathy.

Connie

Thank you

I want to thank all of you for your prayers and thoughts for Ken. Hepassed away this morning and will be missed."The LUPIES Store" Come check out our store...http://www.cafepress.com/thelupies"The LUPIES Web Page"http://www.itzarion.com/lupusgroup.html"The LUPIES online photo albums!" Check out what your fellow Lupies look like...http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?username=lupies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

,

I extend to you my deepest sympathy.

Connie

Thank you

I want to thank all of you for your prayers and thoughts for Ken. Hepassed away this morning and will be missed."The LUPIES Store" Come check out our store...http://www.cafepress.com/thelupies"The LUPIES Web Page"http://www.itzarion.com/lupusgroup.html"The LUPIES online photo albums!" Check out what your fellow Lupies look like...http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?username=lupies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OH SANDRA I AM SO SORRY TO HEAR THAT HE PASSED ... ARE YOU OK ? I KNOW YOU HAVE HAD SO MUCH GOING ON IN THE LAST YEAR ... ILL KEEP YOU AND ALL IN MY PRAYERS

ROMIE

I want to thank all of you for your prayers and thoughts for Ken. He

passed away this morning and will be missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
  • 1 year later...
Guest guest

,

Unfortunately this article is written with a much more political

bent. The reality is that no matter what system we have the movement has been

toward rationing. We have all heard of people who have to pay out of pocket for

proton therapy but not if they have Medicare, the public program, and waits for

that treatment are often significant if someone chooses to go to Loma . How

many people have complained that they have to wait for and appointment with a

specialist or they have had to fight with their insurance for their preferred

treatment or physician. Under Medicare the public program they do not limit the

physician you can see.

Even with insurance, out of pocket costs can be extreme and we

have an unacceptable number of people who have no insurance. Cost of

healthcare is out of control and our program has not lead to necessarily better

outcomes.

Something has to give. I have attached information on two of

the programs that are being considered.

How would you suggest amending these programs or what

alternative would you suggest? Rather than getting into a discussion of

politics, it would be helpful if we read the proposed legislation and speak up to

our legislators about what we want to see as part of reform.

It s not appropriate on this list to take partisan stances. The

discussion that is happening reminds me of discussions about which treatment is

the “best” treatment. We all know that the best way to approach

these issues is to read as much as we can from as many sources as we can,

including as many source documents as possible. Then we can make a determination

that is educated and not overly influenced by voices from either the right or

the left.

Kathy

From: ProstateCancerSupport

[mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of

Emerson

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 3:07 PM

To: ProstateCancerSupport

Subject: [!! SPAM] Re: Thank you

Or, for a different perspective try this

article:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/call_it_what_it_is_rationed_he.html

Tom wrote " I'm terribly concerned

about the prospect of socialized medicine lowering our standard of treatment

precipitously. "

Tom if I could help allay your fears,

you could benefit from reading this article.

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12523427

" Il faut d'abord durer "

Hemingway

Thank you

Thank you for accepting me back into the fold. I

joined this group a couple years ago when I had BPH but had not been diagnosed

with cancer. Now I have been.

In a nutshell, I'm 64, married, have a Gleason

score of 6 with a 67% chance that the cancer is still only in the prostate. Out

of 12 biopsies, only a small part of one is malignant, although it's on the

bottom of the prostate. I was ready to sign up for brachytherapy until we spent

time with the radiological oncologist yesterday. External radiation seems to be

an acceptable alternative, although I understand that if it doesn't work, it

can't be done again. I've pretty much ruled out surgery, but I don't know how

aggressive to be in my treatment. I was also on testosterone therapy for

several months, so it seems ironic that the emphasis now is on removing the

testosterone that I know can be feeding the cancer but seemed so important before.

Any great thoughts re: radiation now, either

internal or external, vs. waiting to see what happens? I have minimal health

coverage now and will be on Medicare in six months, so I don't know if there's

an advantage one way or the other in terms of coverage. I'm terribly concerned

about the prospect of socialized medicine lowering our standard of treatment

precipitously.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Tom Lauterback

--

Emerson

www.flhw.org

2 of 2 File(s)

060909 HELP NHR Leg Section by Section with Options.doc

Tri-Comm Health Care Reform Outline 6-8-09.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank you, . I'm afraid it did not allay my concerns, but

thanks nonetheless. I don't want to inject politics into a mutual support site,

but I'm afraid I'm still terribly concerned.

Tom Lauterback

2820 Edgewater Drive

Elgin, IL 60124

(cell)

From: ProstateCancerSupport

[mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of

Kennedy

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:10 PM

To: ProstateCancerSupport

Subject: Re: Thank you

Tom

wrote " I'm terribly concerned about the prospect of socialized

medicine lowering our standard of treatment precipitously. "

Tom

if I could help allay your fears, you could benefit from reading this

article.

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12523427

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I was also on testosterone therapy for several months, so it seems ironic that the emphasis now is on removing the testosterone that I know can be feeding the cancer but seemed so important before.

Hi:

I've studied the testosterone issue considerably, and I have still not found any studies that can prove that testosterone "feeds the cancer". As a matter of fact there are studies that prove the opposite. For several years I've had LOW testosterone but I still got cancer. Bye

Emile A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...