FDA Draft Report Urges Consumption of Fish, Despite Mercury Contamination

[Guest guest]

Colleagues, the following is FYI and does not necessarily reflect my own

opinion. I have no further knowledge of the topic. If you do not wish to

receive these posts, set your email filter to filter out any messages

coming from @nutritionucanlivewith.com and the program will remove

anything coming from me.

---------------------------------------------------------

FDA Draft Report Urges Consumption of Fish, Despite Mercury Contamination

By Lyndsey Layton

Washington Post Staff Writer

Friday, December 12, 2008; A07

The Food and Drug Administration is urging the government to amend its

advisory that women and children should limit how much fish they eat,

saying that the benefits of seafood outweigh the health risks and that

most people should eat more fish, even if it contains mercury.

If approved by the White House, the FDA's position would reverse the

government's current policy that certain groups -- women of childbearing

years, pregnant women, nursing mothers, infants and children -- can be

harmed by the mercury in fish and should limit their consumption.

The FDA's recommendations have alarmed scientists at the Environmental

Protection Agency, who in internal memos criticized them as

" scientifically flawed and inadequate " and said they fell short of the

" scientific rigor routinely demonstrated by EPA. "

The FDA sent its draft report, a copy of which was obtained by The

Washington Post, to the White House Office of Management and Budget as

part of the FDA's effort to update the existing health advisory. The

report argued that nutrients in fish, including omega-3 fatty acids,

selenium and other minerals could boost a child's IQ by three points.

The greatest benefits, the FDA report said, would come from eating more

than 12 ounces of fish a week, which is the current limit advised for

pregnant women, women of childbearing age, nursing mothers and young

children.

FDA spokesman Herndon declined to discuss the draft report. " As

a science-based regulatory agency we periodically and routinely review

and analyze scientific evidence about health effects of FDA-regulated

products, " he wrote in an e-mail. " We do not comment on draft reports

that are undergoing internal review. "

H. Grumbles, the EPA's assistant administrator for water, said,

" EPA is working closely with other agencies in the scientific review of

this report to better understand the risks and benefits of fish

consumption. "

The FDA and the EPA both play a role in protecting the public from

mercury contamination. The EPA investigates and regulates mercury and

other contaminants in recreationally caught fish, while the FDA

regulates mercury in seafood sold in markets and restaurants. States

rely on the federal agencies in issuing their own advisories.

In 2004, the two agencies issued their first joint advisory, suggesting

that women of childbearing age, pregnant women, nursing mothers, infants

and children stop eating four species of fish considered especially high

in mercury: swordfish, shark, tilefish and king mackerel. At the same

time, the government advised limiting consumption of other

mercury-contaminated fish.

Mercury can damage the neurological development of fetuses and infants.

Recent studies have suggested that mercury may also pose a health risk

for adults, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

The two agencies are supposed to work together to regularly review the

advisory, but EPA sources said the FDA went ahead with its own proposal

earlier this year, not consulting the EPA until the document was nearly

finished.

The Environmental Working Group, an advocacy organization, wrote

yesterday to EPA Administrator L. and urged him to fight

the FDA's recommendations.

" This is an astonishing, irresponsible document, " said Wiles,

the environmental group's executive director. " It's a commentary on how

low FDA has sunk as an agency. It was once a fierce protector of

America's health, and now it's nothing more than a patsy for polluters. "

Mahaffey, who was the EPA's top mercury scientist until she left

the agency in August to become a lecturer at Washington

University School of Public Health, said the FDA used an " oversimplified

approach " that could increase the public's exposure to mercury.

But Gavin Gibbons, a spokesman for the National Fisheries Institute,

applauded the FDA's efforts. " This is a science-based approach, " he

said. " And you start to see a picture emerge that shows the clear

benefits of eating seafood outweigh the risks of a trace amount of

mercury in fish. "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/11/AR2008121103394.\

html

--

ne Holden, MS, RD

" Ask the Parkinson Dietitian " http://www.parkinson.org/

" Eat well, stay well with Parkinson's disease "

" Parkinson's disease: Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy "

http://www.nutritionucanlivewith.com/