Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 http://www.urotoday.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view_ua & id=2216015 Monday, 14 July 2008 Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St 's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom. The biologic potential of prostate cancer (pCA) is variable, and the ability to identify tumours that might cause morbidity and mortality is limited. This systematic review sought to establish whether measurement of tumour extent in biopsies provides additional prognostic information on the risk of disease progression. A comprehensive 31-step search strategy was run in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Knowledge (January 1990-July 2007) and supplemented by the hand-searching of references in retrieved articles and relevant journals to identify publications related to the measurement of the length of cancer in biopsies and biochemical or clinical recurrence or pCA death. Thirteen papers reporting on at least 100 patients were identified and included patients treated by watchful waiting or hormonal therapy (n=1), radical prostatectomy (n=11), or radiotherapy (n=1). Only two studies reported on clinical progression or mortality. Sources of bias included patient selection and missing data resulting from the retrospective nature of the studies. Confounding factors included differences in biopsy strategies and measurement methods. The percentage of cancer in biopsies (overall percentage or the greatest percentage in the most involved core) was an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and clinical outcomes regardless of the form of treatment and was generally superior to simply counting the number of positive cores. The marked variability in study design, conduct, and reporting precluded meta-analysis of the data and precise risk estimation. Tumour quantitation is a promising prognostic tool in the assessment of risk of pCA progression. However, well-designed, population-based studies, controlling for confounding factors, are required to provide more accurate risk estimation and develop management strategies. This review highlights the need for new approaches in the assessment of pathologic prognostic factors to reach the level of evidence achieved in other areas of medical practice. Written by Harnden P, MD, Naylor B, Coles B, Mason MD. Reference Eur Urol. 2008 Jun 26. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.068 PubMed Abstract PMID:18603352 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.