Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 http://www.urotoday.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view_ua & id=2215999 Monday, 14 July 2008 Department of Urology, University Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. The Prostate CAncer gene 3 (PCA3) assay has shown promise as an aid in prostate cancer (pCA) diagnosis in identifying men with a high probability of a positive (repeat) biopsy. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the PROGENSA PCA3 assay. This European prospective, multicentre study enrolled men with one or two negative biopsies scheduled for repeat biopsy. After digital rectal examination (DRE), first-catch urine was collected to measure PCA3 mRNA concentration and to calculate the PCA3 score. The PCA3 score was compared to biopsy outcome. The diagnostic accuracy of the PCA3 assay was compared to percent of free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA). In 463 men, the positive repeat biopsy rate was 28%. The higher the PCA3 score, the greater the probability of a positive repeat biopsy. The PCA3 score (cut-off of 35) had a greater diagnostic accuracy than %fPSA (cut-off of 25%). The PCA3 score was independent of the number of previous biopsies, age, prostate volume, and total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Moreover, the PCA3 score was significantly higher in men with high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) versus those without HGPIN, clinical stage T2 versus T1, Gleason score >/=7 versus <7, and " significant " versus " indolent " (clinical stage T1c, PSA density [PSAD] <0.15ng/ml, Gleason score in biopsy The probability of a positive repeat biopsy increases with rising PCA3 scores. The PCA3 score was superior to %fPSA for predicting repeat prostate biopsy outcome and may be indicative of clinical stage and significance of pCa. Written by Haese A, de la Taille A, van Poppel H, Marberger M, Stenzl A, Mulders PF, Huland H, Abbou CC, Remzi M, Tinzl M, Feyerabend S, Stillebroer AB, van Gils MP, Schalken JA. Reference Eur Urol. 2008 Jun 26. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.071 PubMed Abstract PMID:18602209 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.