Guest guest Posted January 26, 2007 Report Share Posted January 26, 2007 Access to HIV/AIDS Care: A Study among People Living with HIV/AIDS A study conducted by: The Maharashtra Association of Anthropological Sciences Centre for Health Research and Development, Pune (MAAS-CHRD) Supported by: Resource Centre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS (RCSHA), New Delhi & The Department for International Development (DFID), UK EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The importance of strengthening care and support for India's 5.2 million people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) is increasingly being recognised, and institutional strengthening and capacity building have been adopted as key objectives of the National AIDS Control Programme (NACP). Nationwide hospitals, community care centres and families providing home-based care are working synergistically to provide care and support to PLHA. In order to respond to the full range of care and support needs of PLHA at different stages of the illness, it is necessary to know more about the existing experiences of PLHA in accessing HIV/AIDS services. In this research study, a survey and in-depth interviews were conducted with PLHA accessing a range of health care facilities (public, NGOs, private) in three different states (Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa). This report documents barriers and enabling factors in accessing healthcare and identifies needs from the perspective of PLHA. It also provides insight and information into health services' responsiveness, and sheds light on broader socio- cultural factors at play. The results of the study can help in improving existing programmes, identifying new focus areas and developing novel approaches for improving access to care. It will also help in the development of measurable indicators for access to services for PLHA. Key Findings What is the profile of PLHA who seek care and support from various kinds of providers in the study sites? · The majority of PLHA are young, belonging to the productive age groups in the population (18-45 years), rural residents (75%),with between one and ten years of education. · In all the three study sites the PLHA are poor (median per capita income of Rs. 900), with more than half having no stable income, a third (35%) engaged in unskilled labour, living in families where the earner to dependent ratio is 1:3. · The large proportion of widows (40%) among the PLHA interviewed and the presence of another HIV infected person in the families of 61% of PLHA shows the extent of the epidemic in the study sites. Where do PLHA get tested for HIV? How do they access various HIV testing facilities? What are their experiences while utilizing HIV testing facilities? · Relatively more public facilities (56%) are accessed by PLHA for getting tested for HIV for the first time as compared to private sector facilities (44%). · NGO social workers and private doctors play a key role in referring PLHA for HIV testing. · While the public sector generally follows national policy guidelines of obtaining consent for testing and pre and post-test counselling, the private sector largely flouts guidelines. Consent is not obtained from two-thirds of PLHA, and pre- and post-test counselling is not offered to 61% and 64% of PLHA, who are seeking help from private sector facilities. · Key barriers to accessing HIV testing include: direct and in- direct costs for HIV testing irrespective of sectors, the negative attitude of staff in the private sector and inconvenient location of facilities in the public sector. · Most commonly expressed needs and expectations of PLHA around HIV testing include better behavioural and psychological support from the medical fraternity across private and public sectors. Where do PLHA seek help for HIV-related illnesses? How do they access various facilities for HIV-related Illnesses? What are their experiences while utilizing facilities for HIV-related Illnesses? · The private sector is a key provider for the treatment of both major and minor illnesses for 70% of PLHA. · PLHA who seek care in the public sector face several problems, key among them being non-availability of medicines, staff and diagnostic facilities apart from inconvenient location. · Across public and private sectors, the costs on medicines and investigations that are incurred by PLHA for availing treatment for HIV-related illnesses, along with the negative attitude of providers act as major barriers in receiving continued and quality health care services. · Expressed needs of PLHA with regards to treatment of HIV-related illnesses include the availability of patient-friendly and affordable services for HIV-related illnesses located close to their homes. Where do PLHA access ARVs? How do they access various facilities for ARVs? What are their experiences while utilizing facilities providing ARVs? · The public sector is a key provider of ART for 88% of the 84 PLHA on ART. · Half of the 20 PLHA who initiate ARVs in the private sector, subsequently shift to the public sector ARV rollout because of the high cost of treatment. · NGO workers (27%), referring doctors (20%) and Positive People Networks (10%) are the main enablers facilitating access of PLHA to ARV treatment in either the public or the private health care facilities. · The cost incurred on receiving ART in the private sector is an important barrier in sustaining treatment and ensuring adherence to ART. · Non availability of functioning CD4 count testing facility, the high costs of the test in the public sector and the negative attitude of doctors and other staff members are major barriers to accessing ART under the rollout. · Infra-structural problems like insufficient space result in long waiting hours and queues at the ARV rollout centres. · Key needs expressed by PLHA with regard to ART are continued availability of drugs and affordable and functional CD4 count testing facility, decentralisation of ART to the level of rural hospitals and taluka level health centres, and nutritional supplements in conjunction with provision of ARVs. What non-medical needs do PLHA have and who addresses these needs? 1. PLHA have a wide range of non medical needs that range from financial to psychosocial and nutritional needs. 2. Close family members and relatives provide much of the psycho- social as well as financial support needed by PLHA. 3. PLHA also receive support from a range of people outside the family, including NGOs, friends, neighbours and private doctors. 4. The range of services provided by NGOS to support PLHA was enormous – from financial, psychological, nutritional, social, legal and medical. 5. Close to a third of the PLHA (32%) report having unpleasant experiences with their family members and relatives as a consequence of their HIV positive status. More women (19%) compared to men (13%) reported facing problems, mostly discriminatory attitude and behaviour, from their family members Programmatic Recommendations 1. Care, support and treatment-related needs of PLHA · PLHA in all the three settings seek help from the public, private and NGO sectors for their varied care, support and treatment needs. · PLHA are burdened with costs, debts, and face stigma and discrimination. · The burden of high costs is, in large part, due to the regular episodes of HIV-related illnesses, for which PLHA do not have access to free treatment. 2. Infrastructural, Non-Availability and Supply related issues in public sector settings · There are several problems in the public sector delivery of HIV care services; these include: o Non-availability of testing kits o Non-availability of CD4 testing facilities o Non-availability of essential medicines for OI treatment o Lack of patient friendly services in the public sector including issues like § Staff availability § Staff attitudes § Space § Counselling environments § Waiting time § Complicated procedures 3. Framework of comprehensive HIV/AIDS care for planning needs of PLHA · PLHA have varied care, support and treatment needs at different stages of the illness. · While planning for all these needs, the wider framework of Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Care, as advocated by the UNAIDS, needs to be taken into account. 4. Integration, decentralization and rapid scale-up of ART Programme in India · There are large groups of PLHA with unmet needs and huge expectations regarding ARV treatment across the three sites, indicating the need for decentralization and scale-up of the ART programme in India. · The present ARV rollout sites are struggling with infrastructural issues with respect to adequate space, counselling environments and staffs. Innovative ways need to be used to address these matters. · The management of OI is an unmet need even in the case of patients on ARVs. Attempts need to be made to ensure that OI management becomes an integral part of ARV treatment. · The private sector is a key provider for all phases of being an HIV patient, from initial testing through to being put on ART, apart from playing a facilitating role, along with NGOs, in accessing appropriate treatment. · Across ARV roll-out sites, PLHA have high expectations from the ARV rollout programmes, that go beyond the provision of treatment and extend to financial and nutritional support. o NGO partners can be addressed to play this role after assessing their capacities and competence to do so. 5. Sensitization of private medical providers (PMP) regarding rights and needs of PLHA · Although they play a significant role in HIV testing, OI Management and ARV treatment, PMPs do not follow mandatory procedures, particularly with regard to consent and counselling before and after HIV testing and before and after starting ARVs. 6. Public-Private Partnerships to ensure continuity of care · PLHA in the study incur both direct and indirect costs while seeking treatment for HIV testing, opportunistic infections and ARV treatment. This additional burden has been identified as one of the barriers to accessing continued and quality HIV care. 7. Shift in awareness programmes under the NACP · PLHA have reported the need for access to timely and need-based information about the disease and about the facilities available in the public sector. Research Recommendations: Developing Indicators of Access In a diverse setting like India where " access " assumes context- specific meanings, there is a need to identify appropriate composite quantitative and qualitative indicators that take into consideration factors such as the presence of different kinds of providers who cater to the PLHA population, the quality of care delivered by them, the burden of disease and the burden of accessing care of varying quality from these different providers. Different kinds of studies might generate data to help develop these indicators, e.g.: o Studies that delve into help seeking and enablers and barriers to accessing care in different contexts o Periodically undertaken situation analysis studies using qualitative methods o Studies on disease burden and coping mechanisms at the individual, family and community level. Regards, Saju ph, Research Supervisor, MAAS-CHRD, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: <saju_333@...> For Any Query:Contact At MAAS-CHRD 64, Anand Park Aundh, Pune - 411007 Maharashtra, India. Ph: +91-20-25884150 (Office), 09890906562 (Mobile) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.