Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I just wonder how would it be best for a diet manual? What would we call it

and how if you were given a chance modify it? I have different sites and

since they aren't hospitals I need a better definition as I start to review

the new sites and their diet manuals (or lack of). Usually it is pureed and

I love my speech pathologists who are quick to forward the diets if

tolerated.

> ,

> Liquid consistency would be a texture modification for any nutrition

> therapy the same as pureed or ground. It should not be limited to what in

> the past was used as a " liquid diet " with foods that were liquid at 98.6

> degrees Fahrenheit including frozen ice cream and used as a progressive diet

> from clear liquid to soft diet. Any texture modifications should be

> considered when prescribing a nutrition therapy for a patient.

>

> For instance, I have prescribed a liquid diet for people with a wired jaw

> due to trauma which is actually more of a thin pureed texture modification

> where food can be drank through a straw placed between cheek and gums unless

> a straw is contraindicated by the attending physician. The goal is to

> prevent weight loss during the 6 weeks a person's jaw is wired. They are

> usually provided with wire cutters in case they choke on anything or vomit

> to prevent aspiration. Also prescribed liquid diet for a person with a

> tongue resection due to oral cancer after surgery.

>

> healthy regards,

> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>

>

>

> So you would be for it being not a progression but a stand by itself diet

> or not at all?

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Joanne Larsen wrote:

>

>> , et al,

>> My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a full liquid

>> diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to regular.

>>

>> If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the recommendation

>> of the dietitian to order the appropriate consistency using real food first,

>> then liquid supplements whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

>>

>> If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack the person

>> please.

>>

>> IMHO

>>

>>

>> healthy regards,

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>>> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>>>

>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav Levi wrote:

>>>

>>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>>>

>>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>>

>>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>>>> moments

>>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>>>> truth,

>>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>> CC: hlbrewer@...

>>>> From: joanne@...

>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Colleagues,

>>>>

>>>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my permission to forward.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual, vetted the authors

>>>>

>>>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial launch and the first

>>>>

>>>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in NCM. Dietitians

>>>>

>>>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that their facility's

>>>>

>>>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher insisted the full

>>>>

>>>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and documentation that

>>>>

>>>> there is no science in published literature for a full liquid diet or a

>>>>

>>>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft to regular diets.

>>>>

>>>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of a diet being

>>>>

>>>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> healthy regards,

>>>>

>>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet list this month - just

>>>>> have to

>>>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated " and a few damn

>>>>> surgeons to stop

>>>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the Nutrition Care Manual

>>>>> online

>>>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no evidence for it).

>>>>> Holly

>>>>> ----------

>>>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>>>> ________________________________

>>>>> From: " Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> "

>>>>> <Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>>

>>>>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>>>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>>>> based?

>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I ask;

>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>>>> NEVER

>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>>>> THOUGHT

>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>>>> in

>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>>>> pudding,

>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>>>> for

>>>>> that?

>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>> Fax:

>>>>> DineRight4@...<mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

>>>>> of the

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>> _

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>

>>>> (

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/

>>>> )

>>>>

>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>

>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> ,

>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>>>>> cautious

>>>>>> about.

>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>

>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>>>

>>>>> (

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>

>>>> )

>>>>>

>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the future

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>>>>>

>>>>> liver

>>>>

>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

>>>>>>

>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>

>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

>>>>>>

>>>>> over

>>>>>

>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>>

>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

,

If you notice the Nutrition Care Manual did not use terms like low fat

or low residue (at least not when I was editor). I changed the naming

of " diets " to the " disease name " nutrition therapy to change the focus

from specific nutrients to a nutrition prescription that embraced the

Nutrition Care Process. The intent was to create one diet manual that

would be used in all healthy care facilities to offer consistency of

nutrition care and open the door to documenting the outcomes of

nutrition therapy.

So if pureed and ground are texture modifications, then liquid can be a

texture modification added to any nutrition therapy. I'm sure it will

take time for physicians to prescribe nutrition therapy instead of diets

like low fat, low cholesterol, etc depending on their medical school or

residency training. Dietitians can be on the front lines of that

discussion with doctors. Nutrition therapy puts the responsibility on

the dietitian to use the latest evidence / research for what is

appropriate like the shift in diabetes nutrition therapy from the

exchange list to carb counting or the shift in hyperlipidemia from

limiting cholesterol to limiting sat & trans fats. Nutrition therapy

also provides clearer communication with patients that the diet they

are following is nutrition therapy for their specific diagnosis just

like physical therapy, occupational therapy or drug therapy.

BTW long ago, I quit using " diet " when referring to what people eat

because everyone on this planet is on a diet. Diet is the food you eat

and does not indicate any modification to treat a disease process

especially not inferring weight loss.

healthy regards,

Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

> I just wonder how would it be best for a diet manual? What would we

> call it and how if you were given a chance modify it? I have

> different sites and since they aren't hospitals I need a better

> definition as I start to review the new sites and their diet manuals

> (or lack of). Usually it is pureed and I love my speech pathologists

> who are quick to forward the diets if tolerated.

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Joanne Larsen <joanne@...

> > wrote:

>

> ,

> Liquid consistency would be a texture modification for any

> nutrition therapy the same as pureed or ground. It should not be

> limited to what in the past was used as a " liquid diet " with foods

> that were liquid at 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit including frozen ice

> cream and used as a progressive diet from clear liquid to soft

> diet. Any texture modifications should be considered when

> prescribing a nutrition therapy for a patient.

>

> For instance, I have prescribed a liquid diet for people with a

> wired jaw due to trauma which is actually more of a thin pureed

> texture modification where food can be drank through a straw

> placed between cheek and gums unless a straw is contraindicated by

> the attending physician. The goal is to prevent weight loss

> during the 6 weeks a person's jaw is wired. They are usually

> provided with wire cutters in case they choke on anything or vomit

> to prevent aspiration. Also prescribed liquid diet for a person

> with a tongue resection due to oral cancer after surgery.

>

> healthy regards,

> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>

>

>> So you would be for it being not a progression but a stand by

>> itself diet or not at all?

>>

>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Joanne Larsen

>> > wrote:

>>

>> , et al,

>> My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a

>> full liquid diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to

>> regular.

>>

>> If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the

>> recommendation of the dietitian to order the appropriate

>> consistency using real food first, then liquid supplements

>> whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

>>

>> If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack

>> the person please.

>>

>> IMHO

>>

>>

>> healthy regards,

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>>

>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav

>> Levi> wrote:

>>

>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>

>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>

>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you

>> take, but by the moments

>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People

>> don't forget the truth,

>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>

>>

>> To: rd-usa

>> <mailto:rd-usa >

>> CC: hlbrewer@...

>>

>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Colleagues,

>>

>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my

>> permission to forward.

>>

>>

>>

>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual,

>> vetted the authors

>>

>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial

>> launch and the first

>>

>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in

>> NCM. Dietitians

>>

>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that

>> their facility's

>>

>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher

>> insisted the full

>>

>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and

>> documentation that

>>

>> there is no science in published literature for a

>> full liquid diet or a

>>

>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft

>> to regular diets.

>>

>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of

>> a diet being

>>

>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>

>>

>>

>> healthy regards,

>>

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet

>> list this month - just

>> have to

>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated "

>> and a few damn

>> surgeons to stop

>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the

>> Nutrition Care Manual

>> online

>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no

>> evidence for it).

>> Holly

>> ----------

>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC

>> http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>> ________________________________

>> From: " Dineright4@...

>> <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com

>> <mailto:Dineright4%2540aol.com>> "

>> <Dineright4@...

>> <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com

>> <mailto:Dineright4%2540aol.com>>>

>> To: rd-usa

>>

<mailto:rd-usa ><mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com

>> <mailto:rd-usa%2540yahoogroups.com>>

>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full

>> Liquid Diet? Evidence

>> based?

>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion

>> late.

>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence

>> Based Medicine, I ask;

>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full

>> liquid diets. I've NEVER

>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide

>> still do this. (I

>> THOUGHT

>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently

>> was visiting a friend in

>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his

>> plate. 2% milk, pudding,

>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please

>> show me the evidence for

>> that?

>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>> <tel:> (Mountain Time)

>> Fax: <tel:>

>> DineRight4@...

>> <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com

>> <mailto:DineRight4%2540aol.com>>

>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food

>> sensitivity for IBS,

>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory

>> conditions. Co-author

>> of the

>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended

>> thru 6/20

>> _

>>

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>

>> (

>>

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>

>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui

>> Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>> (

>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>

>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>

>> ,

>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist?

>> That's what I would be cautious

>> about.

>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>> The NATURAL dietitian

>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention,

>> Personal Nutrition Coaching

>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get

>> on the health track

>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>> Internet and telecounseling available for

>> distance clients

>> <tel:>

>> _jpress50@..._

>>

>> (

>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>

>> )

>>

>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are

>> the doctors of the future

>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax -

>> extended thru 6/20

>> But are they doing things like adrenal

>> fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>

>> liver

>>

>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine -

>> red flags should be up

>>

>> IMHO.

>>

>> As should traditional medicine MDs when

>> excessive and unwarranted and

>>

>> over

>>

>> prescribing drugs.

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I must laugh because when I started my first job 33 years ago we used to

keep a list of diets Dr. (usually interns and residents) ordered like " No

gas diet " , " No protein diet " so we were happy when they ordered a full

liquid etc.(as opposed to an NPO for days at a time) since now we at least

had a reasonable starting point - how times have changed. thanks Joanne for

your help.

> ,

> If you notice the Nutrition Care Manual did not use terms like low fat or

> low residue (at least not when I was editor). I changed the naming of

> " diets " to the " disease name " nutrition therapy to change the focus from

> specific nutrients to a nutrition prescription that embraced the Nutrition

> Care Process. The intent was to create one diet manual that would be used in

> all healthy care facilities to offer consistency of nutrition care and open

> the door to documenting the outcomes of nutrition therapy.

>

> So if pureed and ground are texture modifications, then liquid can be a

> texture modification added to any nutrition therapy. I'm sure it will take

> time for physicians to prescribe nutrition therapy instead of diets like low

> fat, low cholesterol, etc depending on their medical school or residency

> training. Dietitians can be on the front lines of that discussion with

> doctors. Nutrition therapy puts the responsibility on the dietitian to use

> the latest evidence / research for what is appropriate like the shift in

> diabetes nutrition therapy from the exchange list to carb counting or the

> shift in hyperlipidemia from limiting cholesterol to limiting sat & trans

> fats. Nutrition therapy also provides clearer communication with patients

> that the diet they are following is nutrition therapy for their specific

> diagnosis just like physical therapy, occupational therapy or drug therapy.

>

> BTW long ago, I quit using " diet " when referring to what people eat because

> everyone on this planet is on a diet. Diet is the food you eat and does not

> indicate any modification to treat a disease process especially not

> inferring weight loss.

>

>

> healthy regards,

> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>

>

>

> I just wonder how would it be best for a diet manual? What would we call it

> and how if you were given a chance modify it? I have different sites and

> since they aren't hospitals I need a better definition as I start to review

> the new sites and their diet manuals (or lack of). Usually it is pureed and

> I love my speech pathologists who are quick to forward the diets if

> tolerated.

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Joanne Larsen wrote:

>

>> ,

>> Liquid consistency would be a texture modification for any nutrition

>> therapy the same as pureed or ground. It should not be limited to what in

>> the past was used as a " liquid diet " with foods that were liquid at 98.6

>> degrees Fahrenheit including frozen ice cream and used as a progressive diet

>> from clear liquid to soft diet. Any texture modifications should be

>> considered when prescribing a nutrition therapy for a patient.

>>

>> For instance, I have prescribed a liquid diet for people with a wired jaw

>> due to trauma which is actually more of a thin pureed texture modification

>> where food can be drank through a straw placed between cheek and gums unless

>> a straw is contraindicated by the attending physician. The goal is to

>> prevent weight loss during the 6 weeks a person's jaw is wired. They are

>> usually provided with wire cutters in case they choke on anything or vomit

>> to prevent aspiration. Also prescribed liquid diet for a person with a

>> tongue resection due to oral cancer after surgery.

>>

>> healthy regards,

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>> So you would be for it being not a progression but a stand by itself diet

>> or not at all?

>>

>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Joanne Larsen wrote:

>>

>>> , et al,

>>> My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a full liquid

>>> diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to regular.

>>>

>>> If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the recommendation

>>> of the dietitian to order the appropriate consistency using real food first,

>>> then liquid supplements whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

>>>

>>> If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack the person

>>> please.

>>>

>>> IMHO

>>>

>>>

>>> healthy regards,

>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>>>>

>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav Levi wrote:

>>>>

>>>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>>>>

>>>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>>>

>>>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>>>>> moments

>>>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>>>>> truth,

>>>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>>> CC: hlbrewer@...

>>>>> From: joanne@...

>>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Colleagues,

>>>>>

>>>>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my permission to

>>>>> forward.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual, vetted the authors

>>>>>

>>>>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial launch and the first

>>>>>

>>>>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in NCM. Dietitians

>>>>>

>>>>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that their facility's

>>>>>

>>>>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher insisted the full

>>>>>

>>>>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and documentation that

>>>>>

>>>>> there is no science in published literature for a full liquid diet or a

>>>>>

>>>>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft to regular diets.

>>>>>

>>>>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of a diet being

>>>>>

>>>>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> healthy regards,

>>>>>

>>>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet list this month - just

>>>>>> have to

>>>>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated " and a few damn

>>>>>> surgeons to stop

>>>>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the Nutrition Care Manual

>>>>>> online

>>>>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no evidence for it).

>>>>>> Holly

>>>>>> ----------

>>>>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>>>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>>>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>>>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>>>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>>>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>>>>> ________________________________

>>>>>> From: " Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> "

>>>>>> <Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>>

>>>>>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>>>>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>>>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>>>>> based?

>>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

>>>>>> ask;

>>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>>>>> NEVER

>>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>>>>> THOUGHT

>>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>>>>> in

>>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>>>>> pudding,

>>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>>>>> for

>>>>>> that?

>>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>>> Fax:

>>>>>> DineRight4@...<mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

>>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

>>>>>> of the

>>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>> _

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>>

>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/

>>>>> )

>>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>>

>>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ,

>>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>>>>>> cautious

>>>>>>> about.

>>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>>

>>>>> )

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

>>>>>>> future

>>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> liver

>>>>>

>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> over

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I must laugh because when I started my first job 33 years ago we used to

keep a list of diets Dr. (usually interns and residents) ordered like " No

gas diet " , " No protein diet " so we were happy when they ordered a full

liquid etc.(as opposed to an NPO for days at a time) since now we at least

had a reasonable starting point - how times have changed. thanks Joanne for

your help.

> ,

> If you notice the Nutrition Care Manual did not use terms like low fat or

> low residue (at least not when I was editor). I changed the naming of

> " diets " to the " disease name " nutrition therapy to change the focus from

> specific nutrients to a nutrition prescription that embraced the Nutrition

> Care Process. The intent was to create one diet manual that would be used in

> all healthy care facilities to offer consistency of nutrition care and open

> the door to documenting the outcomes of nutrition therapy.

>

> So if pureed and ground are texture modifications, then liquid can be a

> texture modification added to any nutrition therapy. I'm sure it will take

> time for physicians to prescribe nutrition therapy instead of diets like low

> fat, low cholesterol, etc depending on their medical school or residency

> training. Dietitians can be on the front lines of that discussion with

> doctors. Nutrition therapy puts the responsibility on the dietitian to use

> the latest evidence / research for what is appropriate like the shift in

> diabetes nutrition therapy from the exchange list to carb counting or the

> shift in hyperlipidemia from limiting cholesterol to limiting sat & trans

> fats. Nutrition therapy also provides clearer communication with patients

> that the diet they are following is nutrition therapy for their specific

> diagnosis just like physical therapy, occupational therapy or drug therapy.

>

> BTW long ago, I quit using " diet " when referring to what people eat because

> everyone on this planet is on a diet. Diet is the food you eat and does not

> indicate any modification to treat a disease process especially not

> inferring weight loss.

>

>

> healthy regards,

> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>

>

>

> I just wonder how would it be best for a diet manual? What would we call it

> and how if you were given a chance modify it? I have different sites and

> since they aren't hospitals I need a better definition as I start to review

> the new sites and their diet manuals (or lack of). Usually it is pureed and

> I love my speech pathologists who are quick to forward the diets if

> tolerated.

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Joanne Larsen wrote:

>

>> ,

>> Liquid consistency would be a texture modification for any nutrition

>> therapy the same as pureed or ground. It should not be limited to what in

>> the past was used as a " liquid diet " with foods that were liquid at 98.6

>> degrees Fahrenheit including frozen ice cream and used as a progressive diet

>> from clear liquid to soft diet. Any texture modifications should be

>> considered when prescribing a nutrition therapy for a patient.

>>

>> For instance, I have prescribed a liquid diet for people with a wired jaw

>> due to trauma which is actually more of a thin pureed texture modification

>> where food can be drank through a straw placed between cheek and gums unless

>> a straw is contraindicated by the attending physician. The goal is to

>> prevent weight loss during the 6 weeks a person's jaw is wired. They are

>> usually provided with wire cutters in case they choke on anything or vomit

>> to prevent aspiration. Also prescribed liquid diet for a person with a

>> tongue resection due to oral cancer after surgery.

>>

>> healthy regards,

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>> So you would be for it being not a progression but a stand by itself diet

>> or not at all?

>>

>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Joanne Larsen wrote:

>>

>>> , et al,

>>> My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a full liquid

>>> diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to regular.

>>>

>>> If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the recommendation

>>> of the dietitian to order the appropriate consistency using real food first,

>>> then liquid supplements whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

>>>

>>> If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack the person

>>> please.

>>>

>>> IMHO

>>>

>>>

>>> healthy regards,

>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>>>>

>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav Levi wrote:

>>>>

>>>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>>>>

>>>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>>>

>>>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>>>>> moments

>>>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>>>>> truth,

>>>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>>> CC: hlbrewer@...

>>>>> From: joanne@...

>>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Colleagues,

>>>>>

>>>>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my permission to

>>>>> forward.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual, vetted the authors

>>>>>

>>>>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial launch and the first

>>>>>

>>>>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in NCM. Dietitians

>>>>>

>>>>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that their facility's

>>>>>

>>>>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher insisted the full

>>>>>

>>>>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and documentation that

>>>>>

>>>>> there is no science in published literature for a full liquid diet or a

>>>>>

>>>>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft to regular diets.

>>>>>

>>>>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of a diet being

>>>>>

>>>>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> healthy regards,

>>>>>

>>>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet list this month - just

>>>>>> have to

>>>>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated " and a few damn

>>>>>> surgeons to stop

>>>>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the Nutrition Care Manual

>>>>>> online

>>>>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no evidence for it).

>>>>>> Holly

>>>>>> ----------

>>>>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>>>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>>>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>>>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>>>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>>>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>>>>> ________________________________

>>>>>> From: " Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> "

>>>>>> <Dineright4@...<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>>

>>>>>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>>>>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>>>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>>>>> based?

>>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

>>>>>> ask;

>>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>>>>> NEVER

>>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>>>>> THOUGHT

>>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>>>>> in

>>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>>>>> pudding,

>>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>>>>> for

>>>>>> that?

>>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>>> Fax:

>>>>>> DineRight4@...<mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

>>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

>>>>>> of the

>>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>> _

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>>

>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/

>>>>> )

>>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>>

>>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ,

>>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>>>>>> cautious

>>>>>>> about.

>>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> (

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>>

>>>>> )

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

>>>>>>> future

>>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> liver

>>>>>

>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> over

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

TY:) Joanne for your hard editing work! I am so happy to say good bye

to all the " diet " manuals! Every U S medical facility should have the

Nutrition Care Manual.

Sent from my iPhone

> ,

> If you notice the Nutrition Care Manual did not use terms like low fat

> or low residue (at least not when I was editor). I changed the naming

> of " diets " to the " disease name " nutrition therapy to change the focus

> from specific nutrients to a nutrition prescription that embraced the

> Nutrition Care Process. The intent was to create one diet manual that

> would be used in all healthy care facilities to offer consistency of

> nutrition care and open the door to documenting the outcomes of

> nutrition therapy.

>

> So if pureed and ground are texture modifications, then liquid can

> be a

> texture modification added to any nutrition therapy. I'm sure it will

> take time for physicians to prescribe nutrition therapy instead of

> diets

> like low fat, low cholesterol, etc depending on their medical school

> or

> residency training. Dietitians can be on the front lines of that

> discussion with doctors. Nutrition therapy puts the responsibility on

> the dietitian to use the latest evidence / research for what is

> appropriate like the shift in diabetes nutrition therapy from the

> exchange list to carb counting or the shift in hyperlipidemia from

> limiting cholesterol to limiting sat & trans fats. Nutrition therapy

> also provides clearer communication with patients that the diet they

> are following is nutrition therapy for their specific diagnosis just

> like physical therapy, occupational therapy or drug therapy.

>

> BTW long ago, I quit using " diet " when referring to what people eat

> because everyone on this planet is on a diet. Diet is the food you

> eat

> and does not indicate any modification to treat a disease process

> especially not inferring weight loss.

>

> healthy regards,

> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>

>

>> I just wonder how would it be best for a diet manual? What would we

>> call it and how if you were given a chance modify it? I have

>> different sites and since they aren't hospitals I need a better

>> definition as I start to review the new sites and their diet manuals

>> (or lack of). Usually it is pureed and I love my speech pathologists

>> who are quick to forward the diets if tolerated.

>>

>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Joanne Larsen <joanne@...

>> > wrote:

>>

>> ,

>> Liquid consistency would be a texture modification for any

>> nutrition therapy the same as pureed or ground. It should not be

>> limited to what in the past was used as a " liquid diet " with foods

>> that were liquid at 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit including frozen ice

>> cream and used as a progressive diet from clear liquid to soft

>> diet. Any texture modifications should be considered when

>> prescribing a nutrition therapy for a patient.

>>

>> For instance, I have prescribed a liquid diet for people with a

>> wired jaw due to trauma which is actually more of a thin pureed

>> texture modification where food can be drank through a straw

>> placed between cheek and gums unless a straw is contraindicated by

>> the attending physician. The goal is to prevent weight loss

>> during the 6 weeks a person's jaw is wired. They are usually

>> provided with wire cutters in case they choke on anything or vomit

>> to prevent aspiration. Also prescribed liquid diet for a person

>> with a tongue resection due to oral cancer after surgery.

>>

>> healthy regards,

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>> So you would be for it being not a progression but a stand by

>>> itself diet or not at all?

>>>

>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Joanne Larsen

>>> > wrote:

>>>

>>> , et al,

>>> My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a

>>> full liquid diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to

>>> regular.

>>>

>>> If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the

>>> recommendation of the dietitian to order the appropriate

>>> consistency using real food first, then liquid supplements

>>> whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

>>>

>>> If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack

>>> the person please.

>>>

>>> IMHO

>>>

>>>

>>> healthy regards,

>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>>>

>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav

>>> Levi> wrote:

>>>

>>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>>

>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food

>>> police.

>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>

>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you

>>> take, but by the moments

>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People

>>> don't forget the truth,

>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary

>>> Road)

>>>

>>>

>>> To: rd-usa

>>> <mailto:rd-usa >

>>> CC: hlbrewer@...

>>> From: joanne@... <mailto:joanne@...

>>> >

>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>> based?

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Colleagues,

>>>

>>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my

>>> permission to forward.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual,

>>> vetted the authors

>>>

>>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial

>>> launch and the first

>>>

>>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in

>>> NCM. Dietitians

>>>

>>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that

>>> their facility's

>>>

>>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher

>>> insisted the full

>>>

>>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and

>>> documentation that

>>>

>>> there is no science in published literature for a

>>> full liquid diet or a

>>>

>>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft

>>> to regular diets.

>>>

>>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of

>>> a diet being

>>>

>>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research

>>> based.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> healthy regards,

>>>

>>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet

>>> list this month - just

>>> have to

>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated "

>>> and a few damn

>>> surgeons to stop

>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the

>>> Nutrition Care Manual

>>> online

>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no

>>> evidence for it).

>>> Holly

>>> ----------

>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC

>>> http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>> ________________________________

>>> From: " Dineright4@...

>>>

>>> <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com

>>> <mailto:Dineright4%2540aol.com>> "

>>> <Dineright4@...

>>>

>>> <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com

>>> <mailto:Dineright4%2540aol.com>>>

>>> To: rd-usa

>>> <mailto:rd-usa ><mailto:rd-usa

>>> %40yahoogroups.com

>>> <mailto:rd-usa%2540yahoogroups.com>>

>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full

>>> Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>> based?

>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion

>>> late.

>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence

>>> Based Medicine, I ask;

>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full

>>> liquid diets. I've NEVER

>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide

>>> still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently

>>> was visiting a friend in

>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his

>>> plate. 2% milk, pudding,

>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please

>>> show me the evidence for

>>> that?

>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>> <tel:> (Mountain Time)

>>> Fax: <tel:>

>>> DineRight4@...

>>>

>>> <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com

>>> <mailto:DineRight4%2540aol.com>>

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food

>>> sensitivity for IBS,

>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory

>>> conditions. Co-author

>>> of the

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended

>>> thru 6/20

>>> _

>>>

>>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>

>>> (

>>>

>>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/

>>> )

>>>

>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui

>>> Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>> (

>>>

>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>

>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)>

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>> ,

>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist?

>>> That's what I would be cautious

>>> about.

>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention,

>>> Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get

>>> on the health track

>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>> Internet and telecounseling available for

>>> distance clients

>>> <tel:>

>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>

>>> (

>>>

>>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>

>>> )

>>>

>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are

>>> the doctors of the future

>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax -

>>> extended thru 6/20

>>> But are they doing things like adrenal

>>> fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>>

>>> liver

>>>

>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine -

>>> red flags should be up

>>>

>>> IMHO.

>>>

>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when

>>> excessive and unwarranted and

>>>

>>> over

>>>

>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>

>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been

>>> removed]

>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been

>>> removed]

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Carol,

It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a sharp

RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to display an

anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us have a BS,

right? That means bachelor of science.

I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated world,

I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I don't

sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are because we

do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl, I can take it.

I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was curious about why

she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending others with critique of

comments, then I guess this list is not based on discussion and information

seeking - rather there is no need for those who don't buy the party line?

Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not playing

fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and that you are

not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor Roosevelt once said

" No one can make you feel inferior without your permission " . I had over 20 years

experience as a clinical RD, Clinical Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition

support RD, and administrator before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes,

I have walked in your shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid

diets. In fact, it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full

liquid diet " .

I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world. But

first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and probably

have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular therapies. Also,

EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on pharmaceuticals " .

Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated that there is really

no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for otitis media in small

children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians and parents that there

was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day, guess who was most upset?

Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently another EBM project came out

against an expensive (and popular) therapy for back injuries. Again, EBM showed

that less, not more treatment was more effective.

Regards,

pam

Pam Charney, PhD, RD

Author, Consultant

pcharney@...

" Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> ,

>

> Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

>

> Pam:

>

> Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes to

> my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> fashion in which you did.

>

> As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and 50%

> with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

>

> Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you going

> to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is contrary

> to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person can

> tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we base

> our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> professional in a professional organization that would treat each other in

> this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is not

> how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

>

>

>> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

>> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I think

>> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

>> for

>> it.

>>

>> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

>> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could be

>> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

>> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want some

>> data first, not testimonials.

>>

>>

>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

>>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold many

>> on

>>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all informed

>>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an expert

>> on

>>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy, professionally,

>> to

>>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq diets

>>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

>> should

>>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

>> all

>>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

>>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

>> value

>>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats why

>>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

>> just

>>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

>>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly appreciate,

>>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

>> being

>>> scrutinized by others.

>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>

>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>> moments

>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>> truth,

>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>

>>>

>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>> From: pcharney@...

>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

>>>

>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>

>>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

>>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one instance

>> in

>>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so many

>>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

>>>>

>>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

>> EBM

>>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

>>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

>>> systematic reviews?

>>>>

>>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

>> useful.

>>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

>> keep

>>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to the

>>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are they

>>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization when

>>> regular diets are withheld.

>>>>

>>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

>> system

>>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

>> because

>>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

>> days;

>>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

>> results

>>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that are

>>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort studies,

>>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

>>>>

>>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

>> research.

>>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

>> 1920s,

>>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that time

>>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients died.

>>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

>> human

>>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes. We

>>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to the

>>> earth.

>>>>

>>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

>> controlled

>>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

>> that

>>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

>>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

>>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

>>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle. Why?

>>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area of

>>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

>>>>

>>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

>>> before you try something new or different on real people you should have

>>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure anyone

>>> would be opposed to that?

>>>>

>>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

>>>> Author, Consultant

>>>> pcharney@...

>>>>

>>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>>

>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

>> ask;

>>>

>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>> NEVER

>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>>

>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>> in

>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>> pudding,

>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>>

>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>>

>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>> for

>>>>> that?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>> Fax:

>>>>> DineRight4@...

>>>>>

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

>> Co-author

>>> of the

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>>

>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>

>>>>> _

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>> (

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ,

>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>> cautious

>>>>>> about.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

>> Coaching

>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>

>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>> )

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

>>> future

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>> liver

>>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

>> up

>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

>> and

>>>

>>>>> over

>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>

>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Carol,

It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a sharp

RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to display an

anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us have a BS,

right? That means bachelor of science.

I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated world,

I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I don't

sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are because we

do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl, I can take it.

I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was curious about why

she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending others with critique of

comments, then I guess this list is not based on discussion and information

seeking - rather there is no need for those who don't buy the party line?

Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not playing

fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and that you are

not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor Roosevelt once said

" No one can make you feel inferior without your permission " . I had over 20 years

experience as a clinical RD, Clinical Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition

support RD, and administrator before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes,

I have walked in your shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid

diets. In fact, it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full

liquid diet " .

I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world. But

first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and probably

have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular therapies. Also,

EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on pharmaceuticals " .

Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated that there is really

no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for otitis media in small

children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians and parents that there

was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day, guess who was most upset?

Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently another EBM project came out

against an expensive (and popular) therapy for back injuries. Again, EBM showed

that less, not more treatment was more effective.

Regards,

pam

Pam Charney, PhD, RD

Author, Consultant

pcharney@...

" Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> ,

>

> Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

>

> Pam:

>

> Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes to

> my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> fashion in which you did.

>

> As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and 50%

> with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

>

> Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you going

> to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is contrary

> to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person can

> tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we base

> our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> professional in a professional organization that would treat each other in

> this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is not

> how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

>

>

>> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

>> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I think

>> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

>> for

>> it.

>>

>> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

>> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could be

>> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

>> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want some

>> data first, not testimonials.

>>

>>

>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

>>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold many

>> on

>>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all informed

>>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an expert

>> on

>>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy, professionally,

>> to

>>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq diets

>>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

>> should

>>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

>> all

>>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

>>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

>> value

>>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats why

>>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

>> just

>>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

>>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly appreciate,

>>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

>> being

>>> scrutinized by others.

>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>

>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>> moments

>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>> truth,

>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>

>>>

>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>> From: pcharney@...

>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

>>>

>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>

>>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

>>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one instance

>> in

>>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so many

>>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

>>>>

>>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

>> EBM

>>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

>>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

>>> systematic reviews?

>>>>

>>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

>> useful.

>>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

>> keep

>>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to the

>>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are they

>>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization when

>>> regular diets are withheld.

>>>>

>>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

>> system

>>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

>> because

>>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

>> days;

>>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

>> results

>>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that are

>>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort studies,

>>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

>>>>

>>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

>> research.

>>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

>> 1920s,

>>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that time

>>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients died.

>>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

>> human

>>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes. We

>>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to the

>>> earth.

>>>>

>>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

>> controlled

>>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

>> that

>>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

>>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

>>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

>>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle. Why?

>>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area of

>>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

>>>>

>>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

>>> before you try something new or different on real people you should have

>>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure anyone

>>> would be opposed to that?

>>>>

>>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

>>>> Author, Consultant

>>>> pcharney@...

>>>>

>>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>>

>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

>> ask;

>>>

>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>> NEVER

>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>>

>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>> in

>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>> pudding,

>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>>

>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>>

>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>> for

>>>>> that?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>> Fax:

>>>>> DineRight4@...

>>>>>

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

>> Co-author

>>> of the

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>>

>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>

>>>>> _

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>> (

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ,

>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>> cautious

>>>>>> about.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

>> Coaching

>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>

>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>> )

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

>>> future

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>> liver

>>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

>> up

>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

>> and

>>>

>>>>> over

>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>

>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Carol,

It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a sharp

RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to display an

anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us have a BS,

right? That means bachelor of science.

I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated world,

I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I don't

sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are because we

do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl, I can take it.

I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was curious about why

she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending others with critique of

comments, then I guess this list is not based on discussion and information

seeking - rather there is no need for those who don't buy the party line?

Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not playing

fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and that you are

not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor Roosevelt once said

" No one can make you feel inferior without your permission " . I had over 20 years

experience as a clinical RD, Clinical Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition

support RD, and administrator before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes,

I have walked in your shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid

diets. In fact, it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full

liquid diet " .

I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world. But

first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and probably

have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular therapies. Also,

EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on pharmaceuticals " .

Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated that there is really

no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for otitis media in small

children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians and parents that there

was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day, guess who was most upset?

Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently another EBM project came out

against an expensive (and popular) therapy for back injuries. Again, EBM showed

that less, not more treatment was more effective.

Regards,

pam

Pam Charney, PhD, RD

Author, Consultant

pcharney@...

" Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> ,

>

> Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

>

> Pam:

>

> Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes to

> my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> fashion in which you did.

>

> As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and 50%

> with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

>

> Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you going

> to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is contrary

> to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person can

> tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we base

> our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> professional in a professional organization that would treat each other in

> this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is not

> how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

>

>

>> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

>> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I think

>> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

>> for

>> it.

>>

>> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

>> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could be

>> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

>> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want some

>> data first, not testimonials.

>>

>>

>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

>>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold many

>> on

>>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all informed

>>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an expert

>> on

>>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy, professionally,

>> to

>>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq diets

>>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

>> should

>>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

>> all

>>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

>>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

>> value

>>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats why

>>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

>> just

>>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

>>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly appreciate,

>>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

>> being

>>> scrutinized by others.

>>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>>

>>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

>> moments

>>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

>> truth,

>>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>>

>>>

>>>> To: rd-usa

>>>> From: pcharney@...

>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

>>>

>>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>>>

>>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

>>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one instance

>> in

>>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so many

>>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

>>>>

>>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

>> EBM

>>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

>>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

>>> systematic reviews?

>>>>

>>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

>> useful.

>>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

>> keep

>>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to the

>>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are they

>>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization when

>>> regular diets are withheld.

>>>>

>>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

>> system

>>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

>> because

>>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

>> days;

>>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

>> results

>>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that are

>>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort studies,

>>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

>>>>

>>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

>> research.

>>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

>> 1920s,

>>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that time

>>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients died.

>>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

>> human

>>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes. We

>>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to the

>>> earth.

>>>>

>>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

>> controlled

>>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

>> that

>>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

>>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

>>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

>>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle. Why?

>>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area of

>>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

>>>>

>>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

>>> before you try something new or different on real people you should have

>>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure anyone

>>> would be opposed to that?

>>>>

>>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

>>>> Author, Consultant

>>>> pcharney@...

>>>>

>>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>>>>

>>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

>> ask;

>>>

>>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

>>> NEVER

>>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>>>>

>>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

>>> in

>>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

>>> pudding,

>>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>>>>

>>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>>>>

>>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

>>> for

>>>>> that?

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>>>> (Mountain Time)

>>>>> Fax:

>>>>> DineRight4@...

>>>>>

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

>> Co-author

>>> of the

>>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>>>>

>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>

>>>>> _

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>>>> (

>>>

>> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

>>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ,

>>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

>>> cautious

>>>>>> about.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

>> Coaching

>>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>>>

>>>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>>>> (

>>>

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>>>> )

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

>>> future

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>>>>

>>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>> liver

>>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

>> up

>>>>> IMHO.

>>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

>> and

>>>

>>>>> over

>>>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>>>

>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

> **

>

>

> Carol,

>

> It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

>

> I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> don't buy the party line?

>

> Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

>

> I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> effective.

>

> Regards,

> pam

>

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@...

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

> > ,

> >

> > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> >

> > Pam:

> >

> > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> to

> > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > fashion in which you did.

> >

> > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> 50%

> > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> >

> > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> going

> > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> contrary

> > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> can

> > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> base

> > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> in

> > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> not

> > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> >

> >

> >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> think

> >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> >> for

> >> it.

> >>

> >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> be

> >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> some

> >> data first, not testimonials.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> many

> >> on

> >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> informed

> >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> expert

> >> on

> >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> professionally,

> >> to

> >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> diets

> >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> >> should

> >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> >> all

> >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> >> value

> >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> why

> >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> >> just

> >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> appreciate,

> >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> >> being

> >>> scrutinized by others.

> >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> >>>

> >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> >> moments

> >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> >> truth,

> >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> To: rd-usa

> >>>> From: pcharney@...

> >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> >>>

> >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> >>>>

> >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> instance

> >> in

> >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> many

> >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> >>>>

> >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> >> EBM

> >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> >>> systematic reviews?

> >>>>

> >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> >> useful.

> >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> >> keep

> >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> the

> >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> they

> >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> when

> >>> regular diets are withheld.

> >>>>

> >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> >> system

> >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> >> because

> >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> >> days;

> >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> >> results

> >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> are

> >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> studies,

> >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> >>>>

> >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> >> research.

> >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> >> 1920s,

> >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> time

> >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> died.

> >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> >> human

> >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> We

> >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> the

> >>> earth.

> >>>>

> >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> >> controlled

> >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> >> that

> >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> Why?

> >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> of

> >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> >>>>

> >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> have

> >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> anyone

> >>> would be opposed to that?

> >>>>

> >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> >>>> Author, Consultant

> >>>> pcharney@...

> >>>>

> >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> >> ask;

> >>>

> >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> >>> NEVER

> >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> >>> THOUGHT

> >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> >>> in

> >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> >>> pudding,

> >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> >>> for

> >>>>> that?

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> >>>>> Fax:

> >>>>> DineRight4@...

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> >> Co-author

> >>> of the

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>

> >>>>> _

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

> >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes. My grandma is the co-author....LOL

but it workd like a charm :)

Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN

A dietitian, not the food police.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

" Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that

take your breath away. " - Carlin

" People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary

Road)

To: rd-usa

From: nrord1@...

Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:52:17 -0400

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

> **

>

>

> Carol,

>

> It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

>

> I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> don't buy the party line?

>

> Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

>

> I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> effective.

>

> Regards,

> pam

>

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@...

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

> > ,

> >

> > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> >

> > Pam:

> >

> > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> to

> > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > fashion in which you did.

> >

> > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> 50%

> > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> >

> > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> going

> > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> contrary

> > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> can

> > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> base

> > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> in

> > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> not

> > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> >

> >

> >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> think

> >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> >> for

> >> it.

> >>

> >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> be

> >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> some

> >> data first, not testimonials.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> many

> >> on

> >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> informed

> >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> expert

> >> on

> >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> professionally,

> >> to

> >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> diets

> >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> >> should

> >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> >> all

> >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> >> value

> >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> why

> >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> >> just

> >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> appreciate,

> >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> >> being

> >>> scrutinized by others.

> >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> >>>

> >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> >> moments

> >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> >> truth,

> >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> To: rd-usa

> >>>> From: pcharney@...

> >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> >>>

> >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> >>>>

> >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> instance

> >> in

> >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> many

> >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> >>>>

> >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> >> EBM

> >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> >>> systematic reviews?

> >>>>

> >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> >> useful.

> >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> >> keep

> >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> the

> >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> they

> >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> when

> >>> regular diets are withheld.

> >>>>

> >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> >> system

> >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> >> because

> >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> >> days;

> >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> >> results

> >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> are

> >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> studies,

> >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> >>>>

> >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> >> research.

> >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> >> 1920s,

> >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> time

> >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> died.

> >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> >> human

> >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> We

> >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> the

> >>> earth.

> >>>>

> >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> >> controlled

> >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> >> that

> >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> Why?

> >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> of

> >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> >>>>

> >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> have

> >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> anyone

> >>> would be opposed to that?

> >>>>

> >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> >>>> Author, Consultant

> >>>> pcharney@...

> >>>>

> >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> >> ask;

> >>>

> >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> >>> NEVER

> >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> >>> THOUGHT

> >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> >>> in

> >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> >>> pudding,

> >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> >>> for

> >>>>> that?

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> >>>>> Fax:

> >>>>> DineRight4@...

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> >> Co-author

> >>> of the

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>

> >>>>> _

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

> >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes. My grandma is the co-author....LOL

but it workd like a charm :)

Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN

A dietitian, not the food police.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

" Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that

take your breath away. " - Carlin

" People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary

Road)

To: rd-usa

From: nrord1@...

Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:52:17 -0400

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

> **

>

>

> Carol,

>

> It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

>

> I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> don't buy the party line?

>

> Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

>

> I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> effective.

>

> Regards,

> pam

>

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@...

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

> > ,

> >

> > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> >

> > Pam:

> >

> > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> to

> > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > fashion in which you did.

> >

> > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> 50%

> > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> >

> > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> going

> > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> contrary

> > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> can

> > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> base

> > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> in

> > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> not

> > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> >

> >

> >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> think

> >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> >> for

> >> it.

> >>

> >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> be

> >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> some

> >> data first, not testimonials.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> many

> >> on

> >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> informed

> >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> expert

> >> on

> >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> professionally,

> >> to

> >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> diets

> >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> >> should

> >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> >> all

> >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> >> value

> >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> why

> >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> >> just

> >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> appreciate,

> >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> >> being

> >>> scrutinized by others.

> >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> >>>

> >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> >> moments

> >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> >> truth,

> >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> To: rd-usa

> >>>> From: pcharney@...

> >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> >>>

> >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> >>>>

> >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> instance

> >> in

> >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> many

> >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> >>>>

> >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> >> EBM

> >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> >>> systematic reviews?

> >>>>

> >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> >> useful.

> >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> >> keep

> >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> the

> >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> they

> >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> when

> >>> regular diets are withheld.

> >>>>

> >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> >> system

> >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> >> because

> >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> >> days;

> >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> >> results

> >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> are

> >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> studies,

> >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> >>>>

> >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> >> research.

> >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> >> 1920s,

> >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> time

> >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> died.

> >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> >> human

> >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> We

> >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> the

> >>> earth.

> >>>>

> >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> >> controlled

> >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> >> that

> >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> Why?

> >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> of

> >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> >>>>

> >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> have

> >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> anyone

> >>> would be opposed to that?

> >>>>

> >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> >>>> Author, Consultant

> >>>> pcharney@...

> >>>>

> >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> >> ask;

> >>>

> >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> >>> NEVER

> >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> >>> THOUGHT

> >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> >>> in

> >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> >>> pudding,

> >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> >>> for

> >>>>> that?

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> >>>>> Fax:

> >>>>> DineRight4@...

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> >> Co-author

> >>> of the

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>

> >>>>> _

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaMT\

i7GYQ

> >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

What about elimination diets?  What research is there to support the specific

foods we choose for those?    Yet, we use them in our practices (which is a

good thing).   By the way, LEAP is nothing more than an elimination diet.  

The difference is that we use all available patient labwork to help us make a

better decision on what foods to include.  

 

I found this previous post by Jan on EMB.  It is  quote from an article about

EMB published in the 2005 ADA journal.   It clearly gives room for

professionals to use their best judgement when research is lacking.  Jan also

posted another interesting article discussing EMB in the medical industry. 

That article follows the ADA quote. 

 

 

 

Evidence Based Medicine

ADA March 2005

 

Evidence-based practice uses:

The best available evidence

The results of peer-reviewed scientific studies

And, when science is lacking, expert opinion and experience

 

Per ADA President, H Laramee

 

 

 

The Mythology Of Science-Based Medicine

Dr. Larry Dossey, Deepak Chopra and Dr. Rustum Roy

Posted: January 7, 2010 12:15 PM

The current healthcare debate has brought up basic questions about how

medicine should work. On one hand we have the medical establishment with

its enormous cadre of M.D.s, medical schools, big pharma, and incredibly

expensive hospital care. On the other we have the semi-condoned field of

alternative medicine that attracts millions of patients a year and

embraces literally thousands of treatment modalities not taught in

medical school.

One side, mainstream medicine, promotes the notion that it alone should

be considered " real " medicine, but more and more this claim is being

exposed as an officially sanctioned myth. When scientific minds turn to

tackling the complex business of healing the sick, they simultaneously

warn us that it's dangerous and foolish to look at integrative medicine,

complementary and alternative medicine, or God forbid, indigenous

medicine for answers. Because these other modalities are enormously

popular, mainstream medicine has made a few grudging concessions to the

placebo effect, natural herbal remedies, and acupuncture over the years.

But M.D.s are still taught that other approaches are risky and inferior

to their own training; they insist, year after year, that all we need

are science-based procedures and the huge spectrum of drugs upon which

modern medicine depends.

If a pill or surgery won't do the trick, most patients are sent home to

await their fate. There is an implied faith here that if a new drug

manufacturer has paid for the research for FDA approval, then it is

scientifically proven to be effective. As it turns out, this belief is

by no means fully justified.

The British Medical Journal recently undertook an general analysis of

common medical treatments to determine which are supported by sufficient

reliable evidence. They evaluated around 2,500 treatments, and the

results were as follows:

* 13 percent were found to be beneficial

* 23 percent were likely to be beneficial

* Eight percent were as likely to be harmful as beneficial

* Six percent were unlikely to be beneficial

* Four percent were likely to be harmful or ineffective.

This left the largest category, 46 percent, as unknown in their

effectiveness. In other words, when you take your sick child to the

hospital or clinic, there is only a 36 percent chance that he will

receive a treatment that has been scientifically demonstrated to be

either beneficial or likely to be beneficial. This is remarkably similar

to the results Dr. Berman found in his analysis of completed

Cochrane reviews of conventional medical practices. There, 38 percent of

treatments were positive and 62 percent were negative or showed " no

evidence of effect. "

For those who have been paying attention, this is not news. Back in the

late 70's the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment determined

that a mere 10 to 20 percent of the practices and treatment used by

physicians are scientifically validated. It's sobering to compare this

number to the chances that a patient will receive benefit due to the

placebo effect, which is between 30 percent and 50 percent, according to

various studies.

We all marvel at the technological advances in materials and techniques

that allow doctors to perform quadruple bypass surgeries and

angioplasties without marveling that recent studies indicate that

coronary bypass surgery will extend life expectancy in only about three

percent of cases. For angioplasty that figure sinks to zero percent.

Those numbers might be close to what you could expect from a witch

doctor, one difference being that witch doctors don't submit bills in

the tens of thousands of dollars.

It would be one thing if any of these unproven conventional medical

treatments were cheap , but they are not. Angioplasty and coronary

artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone cost $100 billion annually. As

quoted by President Obama in his drive to bring down medical costs, $700

billion is spent annually on unnecessary tests and procedures in

America . As part of this excess, it is estimated that 2.5 million

unnecessary surgeries are performed each year.

Then there is the myth that this vast expenditure results in excellent

health care, usually touted as the best in the world (most recently by

Rush Limbaugh as he emerged from a hospital in Hawaii after suffering

chest pain). But this myth has been completely undermined. In 2000 Dr.

Barbara Starfield, writing in the Journal of the American Medical

Association, estimated that between 230,000 and 284,000 deaths occur

each year in the US due to iatrogenic causes, or physician error, making

this number three in the leading causes of death for all Americans.

In 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that out

of the 2.4 billion prescriptions written by doctors annually, 118

million were for antidepressants. It is the number one prescribed

medication, whose use has doubled in the last ten years. You would

think, therefore, that a remarkable endorsement is being offered for the

efficacy of antidepressants. The theory behind standard antidepression

medication is that the disease is caused by low levels of key brain

chemicals like serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, and thus by

manipulating those imbalanced neurotransmitters, a patient's depression

will be reversed or at least alleviated.

This turns out to be another myth. Prof. Eva Redei of Northwestern

University , a leading depression researcher, has discovered that

depressed individuals have no depletion of the genes that produce these

key neurotransmitters compared to people who are not depressed. This

would help explain why an estimated 50 percent of patients don't respond

to antidepressants, and why Dr. Irving Kirsch's meta-analysis of

antidepressants in England showed no significant difference in

effectiveness between them and placebos.

You have a right to be shocked by these findings and by the overall

picture of a system that benefits far fewer patients than it claims. The

sad fact is that a disturbing percentage of the medicine we subject

ourselves to isn't based on hard science, and another percentage is

risky or outright harmful. Obviously, every patient deserves medical

care that is evidence-based, not just based on an illusory reputation

that is promoted in contrast to alternative medicine.

We are not suggesting that Americans adopt any and all alternative

practices simply because they are alternative. These, too, must

demonstrate their effectiveness through objective testing. But

alternative modalities should not be dismissed out of hand in favor of

expensive and unnecessary procedures that have been shown to benefit no

one absolutely except corporate stockholders.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-larry-dossey/the-mythology-of-science_b_412475.\

html.com

 

..

 

Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

Director of Medical Nutrition

Signet Diagnostic Corporation

Telecommuting Nationwide

(Mountain Time) office and cell

Fax:

DineRight4@...

 

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

What about elimination diets?  What research is there to support the specific

foods we choose for those?    Yet, we use them in our practices (which is a

good thing).   By the way, LEAP is nothing more than an elimination diet.  

The difference is that we use all available patient labwork to help us make a

better decision on what foods to include.  

 

I found this previous post by Jan on EMB.  It is  quote from an article about

EMB published in the 2005 ADA journal.   It clearly gives room for

professionals to use their best judgement when research is lacking.  Jan also

posted another interesting article discussing EMB in the medical industry. 

That article follows the ADA quote. 

 

 

 

Evidence Based Medicine

ADA March 2005

 

Evidence-based practice uses:

The best available evidence

The results of peer-reviewed scientific studies

And, when science is lacking, expert opinion and experience

 

Per ADA President, H Laramee

 

 

 

The Mythology Of Science-Based Medicine

Dr. Larry Dossey, Deepak Chopra and Dr. Rustum Roy

Posted: January 7, 2010 12:15 PM

The current healthcare debate has brought up basic questions about how

medicine should work. On one hand we have the medical establishment with

its enormous cadre of M.D.s, medical schools, big pharma, and incredibly

expensive hospital care. On the other we have the semi-condoned field of

alternative medicine that attracts millions of patients a year and

embraces literally thousands of treatment modalities not taught in

medical school.

One side, mainstream medicine, promotes the notion that it alone should

be considered " real " medicine, but more and more this claim is being

exposed as an officially sanctioned myth. When scientific minds turn to

tackling the complex business of healing the sick, they simultaneously

warn us that it's dangerous and foolish to look at integrative medicine,

complementary and alternative medicine, or God forbid, indigenous

medicine for answers. Because these other modalities are enormously

popular, mainstream medicine has made a few grudging concessions to the

placebo effect, natural herbal remedies, and acupuncture over the years.

But M.D.s are still taught that other approaches are risky and inferior

to their own training; they insist, year after year, that all we need

are science-based procedures and the huge spectrum of drugs upon which

modern medicine depends.

If a pill or surgery won't do the trick, most patients are sent home to

await their fate. There is an implied faith here that if a new drug

manufacturer has paid for the research for FDA approval, then it is

scientifically proven to be effective. As it turns out, this belief is

by no means fully justified.

The British Medical Journal recently undertook an general analysis of

common medical treatments to determine which are supported by sufficient

reliable evidence. They evaluated around 2,500 treatments, and the

results were as follows:

* 13 percent were found to be beneficial

* 23 percent were likely to be beneficial

* Eight percent were as likely to be harmful as beneficial

* Six percent were unlikely to be beneficial

* Four percent were likely to be harmful or ineffective.

This left the largest category, 46 percent, as unknown in their

effectiveness. In other words, when you take your sick child to the

hospital or clinic, there is only a 36 percent chance that he will

receive a treatment that has been scientifically demonstrated to be

either beneficial or likely to be beneficial. This is remarkably similar

to the results Dr. Berman found in his analysis of completed

Cochrane reviews of conventional medical practices. There, 38 percent of

treatments were positive and 62 percent were negative or showed " no

evidence of effect. "

For those who have been paying attention, this is not news. Back in the

late 70's the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment determined

that a mere 10 to 20 percent of the practices and treatment used by

physicians are scientifically validated. It's sobering to compare this

number to the chances that a patient will receive benefit due to the

placebo effect, which is between 30 percent and 50 percent, according to

various studies.

We all marvel at the technological advances in materials and techniques

that allow doctors to perform quadruple bypass surgeries and

angioplasties without marveling that recent studies indicate that

coronary bypass surgery will extend life expectancy in only about three

percent of cases. For angioplasty that figure sinks to zero percent.

Those numbers might be close to what you could expect from a witch

doctor, one difference being that witch doctors don't submit bills in

the tens of thousands of dollars.

It would be one thing if any of these unproven conventional medical

treatments were cheap , but they are not. Angioplasty and coronary

artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone cost $100 billion annually. As

quoted by President Obama in his drive to bring down medical costs, $700

billion is spent annually on unnecessary tests and procedures in

America . As part of this excess, it is estimated that 2.5 million

unnecessary surgeries are performed each year.

Then there is the myth that this vast expenditure results in excellent

health care, usually touted as the best in the world (most recently by

Rush Limbaugh as he emerged from a hospital in Hawaii after suffering

chest pain). But this myth has been completely undermined. In 2000 Dr.

Barbara Starfield, writing in the Journal of the American Medical

Association, estimated that between 230,000 and 284,000 deaths occur

each year in the US due to iatrogenic causes, or physician error, making

this number three in the leading causes of death for all Americans.

In 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that out

of the 2.4 billion prescriptions written by doctors annually, 118

million were for antidepressants. It is the number one prescribed

medication, whose use has doubled in the last ten years. You would

think, therefore, that a remarkable endorsement is being offered for the

efficacy of antidepressants. The theory behind standard antidepression

medication is that the disease is caused by low levels of key brain

chemicals like serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, and thus by

manipulating those imbalanced neurotransmitters, a patient's depression

will be reversed or at least alleviated.

This turns out to be another myth. Prof. Eva Redei of Northwestern

University , a leading depression researcher, has discovered that

depressed individuals have no depletion of the genes that produce these

key neurotransmitters compared to people who are not depressed. This

would help explain why an estimated 50 percent of patients don't respond

to antidepressants, and why Dr. Irving Kirsch's meta-analysis of

antidepressants in England showed no significant difference in

effectiveness between them and placebos.

You have a right to be shocked by these findings and by the overall

picture of a system that benefits far fewer patients than it claims. The

sad fact is that a disturbing percentage of the medicine we subject

ourselves to isn't based on hard science, and another percentage is

risky or outright harmful. Obviously, every patient deserves medical

care that is evidence-based, not just based on an illusory reputation

that is promoted in contrast to alternative medicine.

We are not suggesting that Americans adopt any and all alternative

practices simply because they are alternative. These, too, must

demonstrate their effectiveness through objective testing. But

alternative modalities should not be dismissed out of hand in favor of

expensive and unnecessary procedures that have been shown to benefit no

one absolutely except corporate stockholders.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-larry-dossey/the-mythology-of-science_b_412475.\

html.com

 

..

 

Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

Director of Medical Nutrition

Signet Diagnostic Corporation

Telecommuting Nationwide

(Mountain Time) office and cell

Fax:

DineRight4@...

 

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

But where is the research on the testing?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Linke wrote:

> **

>

>

> What about elimination diets? What research is there to support the

> specific foods we choose for those? Yet, we use them in our practices

> (which is a good thing). By the way, LEAP is nothing more than an

> elimination diet. The difference is that we use all available patient

> labwork to help us make a better decision on what foods to include.

>

> I found this previous post by Jan on EMB. It is quote from an article

> about EMB published in the 2005 ADA journal. It clearly gives room for

> professionals to use their best judgement when research is lacking. Jan

> also posted another interesting article discussing EMB in the medical

> industry. That article follows the ADA quote.

>

>

>

>

> Evidence Based Medicine

> ADA March 2005

>

> Evidence-based practice uses:

> The best available evidence

> The results of peer-reviewed scientific studies

> And, when science is lacking, expert opinion and experience

>

> Per ADA President, H Laramee

>

>

>

>

> The Mythology Of Science-Based Medicine

>

> Dr. Larry Dossey, Deepak Chopra and Dr. Rustum Roy

> Posted: January 7, 2010 12:15 PM

>

> The current healthcare debate has brought up basic questions about how

> medicine should work. On one hand we have the medical establishment with

> its enormous cadre of M.D.s, medical schools, big pharma, and incredibly

> expensive hospital care. On the other we have the semi-condoned field of

> alternative medicine that attracts millions of patients a year and

> embraces literally thousands of treatment modalities not taught in

> medical school.

>

> One side, mainstream medicine, promotes the notion that it alone should

> be considered " real " medicine, but more and more this claim is being

> exposed as an officially sanctioned myth. When scientific minds turn to

> tackling the complex business of healing the sick, they simultaneously

> warn us that it's dangerous and foolish to look at integrative medicine,

> complementary and alternative medicine, or God forbid, indigenous

> medicine for answers. Because these other modalities are enormously

> popular, mainstream medicine has made a few grudging concessions to the

> placebo effect, natural herbal remedies, and acupuncture over the years.

> But M.D.s are still taught that other approaches are risky and inferior

> to their own training; they insist, year after year, that all we need

> are science-based procedures and the huge spectrum of drugs upon which

> modern medicine depends.

>

> If a pill or surgery won't do the trick, most patients are sent home to

> await their fate. There is an implied faith here that if a new drug

> manufacturer has paid for the research for FDA approval, then it is

> scientifically proven to be effective. As it turns out, this belief is

> by no means fully justified.

>

> The British Medical Journal recently undertook an general analysis of

> common medical treatments to determine which are supported by sufficient

> reliable evidence. They evaluated around 2,500 treatments, and the

> results were as follows:

>

> * 13 percent were found to be beneficial

>

> * 23 percent were likely to be beneficial

>

> * Eight percent were as likely to be harmful as beneficial

>

> * Six percent were unlikely to be beneficial

>

> * Four percent were likely to be harmful or ineffective.

>

> This left the largest category, 46 percent, as unknown in their

> effectiveness. In other words, when you take your sick child to the

> hospital or clinic, there is only a 36 percent chance that he will

> receive a treatment that has been scientifically demonstrated to be

> either beneficial or likely to be beneficial. This is remarkably similar

> to the results Dr. Berman found in his analysis of completed

> Cochrane reviews of conventional medical practices. There, 38 percent of

> treatments were positive and 62 percent were negative or showed " no

> evidence of effect. "

>

> For those who have been paying attention, this is not news. Back in the

> late 70's the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment determined

> that a mere 10 to 20 percent of the practices and treatment used by

> physicians are scientifically validated. It's sobering to compare this

> number to the chances that a patient will receive benefit due to the

> placebo effect, which is between 30 percent and 50 percent, according to

> various studies.

>

> We all marvel at the technological advances in materials and techniques

> that allow doctors to perform quadruple bypass surgeries and

> angioplasties without marveling that recent studies indicate that

> coronary bypass surgery will extend life expectancy in only about three

> percent of cases. For angioplasty that figure sinks to zero percent.

> Those numbers might be close to what you could expect from a witch

> doctor, one difference being that witch doctors don't submit bills in

> the tens of thousands of dollars.

>

> It would be one thing if any of these unproven conventional medical

> treatments were cheap , but they are not. Angioplasty and coronary

> artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone cost $100 billion annually. As

> quoted by President Obama in his drive to bring down medical costs, $700

> billion is spent annually on unnecessary tests and procedures in

> America . As part of this excess, it is estimated that 2.5 million

> unnecessary surgeries are performed each year.

>

> Then there is the myth that this vast expenditure results in excellent

> health care, usually touted as the best in the world (most recently by

> Rush Limbaugh as he emerged from a hospital in Hawaii after suffering

> chest pain). But this myth has been completely undermined. In 2000 Dr.

> Barbara Starfield, writing in the Journal of the American Medical

> Association, estimated that between 230,000 and 284,000 deaths occur

> each year in the US due to iatrogenic causes, or physician error, making

> this number three in the leading causes of death for all Americans.

>

> In 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that out

> of the 2.4 billion prescriptions written by doctors annually, 118

> million were for antidepressants. It is the number one prescribed

> medication, whose use has doubled in the last ten years. You would

> think, therefore, that a remarkable endorsement is being offered for the

> efficacy of antidepressants. The theory behind standard antidepression

> medication is that the disease is caused by low levels of key brain

> chemicals like serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, and thus by

> manipulating those imbalanced neurotransmitters, a patient's depression

> will be reversed or at least alleviated.

>

> This turns out to be another myth. Prof. Eva Redei of Northwestern

> University , a leading depression researcher, has discovered that

> depressed individuals have no depletion of the genes that produce these

> key neurotransmitters compared to people who are not depressed. This

> would help explain why an estimated 50 percent of patients don't respond

> to antidepressants, and why Dr. Irving Kirsch's meta-analysis of

> antidepressants in England showed no significant difference in

> effectiveness between them and placebos.

>

> You have a right to be shocked by these findings and by the overall

> picture of a system that benefits far fewer patients than it claims. The

> sad fact is that a disturbing percentage of the medicine we subject

> ourselves to isn't based on hard science, and another percentage is

> risky or outright harmful. Obviously, every patient deserves medical

> care that is evidence-based, not just based on an illusory reputation

> that is promoted in contrast to alternative medicine.

>

> We are not suggesting that Americans adopt any and all alternative

> practices simply because they are alternative. These, too, must

> demonstrate their effectiveness through objective testing. But

> alternative modalities should not be dismissed out of hand in favor of

> expensive and unnecessary procedures that have been shown to benefit no

> one absolutely except corporate stockholders.

>

>

>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-larry-dossey/the-mythology-of-science_b_412475.\

html.com

>

>

> .

>

>

> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> Director of Medical Nutrition

> Signet Diagnostic Corporation

> Telecommuting Nationwide

> (Mountain Time) office and cell

>

> Fax:

> DineRight4@...

>

>

>

>

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> ,

> > >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> > >>> cautious

> > >>>>>> about.

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> > >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> > >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> > >> Coaching

> > >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> > >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> > >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> > >>>>> (

> > >>>

> > >>

> >

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> > >>>>> )

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> > >>> future

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> > >>> liver

> > >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> > >> up

> > >>>>> IMHO.

> > >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> > >> and

> > >>>

> > >>>>> over

> > >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nope, the BRAT diet has no research behind it. Ten years ago I had a

pediatrician hospitalist who wanted to get rid of it in our hospital so I did

some digging looking for it and couldn't find anything).

 

Holly

----------

Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

________________________________

To: rd-usa

Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 3:52:17 AM

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

 

Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

> **

>

>

> Carol,

>

> It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

>

> I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> don't buy the party line?

>

> Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

>

> I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> effective.

>

> Regards,

> pam

>

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@...

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

> > ,

> >

> > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> >

> > Pam:

> >

> > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> to

> > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > fashion in which you did.

> >

> > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> 50%

> > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> >

> > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> going

> > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> contrary

> > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> can

> > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> base

> > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> in

> > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> not

> > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> >

> >

> >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> think

> >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> >> for

> >> it.

> >>

> >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> be

> >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> some

> >> data first, not testimonials.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> many

> >> on

> >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> informed

> >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> expert

> >> on

> >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> professionally,

> >> to

> >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> diets

> >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> >> should

> >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> >> all

> >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> >> value

> >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> why

> >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> >> just

> >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> appreciate,

> >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> >> being

> >>> scrutinized by others.

> >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> >>>

> >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> >> moments

> >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> >> truth,

> >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> To: rd-usa

> >>>> From: pcharney@...

> >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> >>>

> >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> >>>>

> >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> instance

> >> in

> >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> many

> >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> >>>>

> >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> >> EBM

> >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> >>> systematic reviews?

> >>>>

> >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> >> useful.

> >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> >> keep

> >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> the

> >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> they

> >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> when

> >>> regular diets are withheld.

> >>>>

> >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> >> system

> >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> >> because

> >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> >> days;

> >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> >> results

> >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> are

> >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> studies,

> >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> >>>>

> >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> >> research.

> >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> >> 1920s,

> >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> time

> >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> died.

> >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> >> human

> >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> We

> >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> the

> >>> earth.

> >>>>

> >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> >> controlled

> >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> >> that

> >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> Why?

> >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> of

> >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> >>>>

> >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> have

> >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> anyone

> >>> would be opposed to that?

> >>>>

> >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> >>>> Author, Consultant

> >>>> pcharney@...

> >>>>

> >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> >> ask;

> >>>

> >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> >>> NEVER

> >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> >>> THOUGHT

> >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> >>> in

> >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> >>> pudding,

> >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> >>> for

> >>>>> that?

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> >>>>> Fax:

> >>>>> DineRight4@...

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> >> Co-author

> >>> of the

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>

> >>>>> _

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaM\

Ti7GYQ

>Q

> >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn\

6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>w

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nope, the BRAT diet has no research behind it. Ten years ago I had a

pediatrician hospitalist who wanted to get rid of it in our hospital so I did

some digging looking for it and couldn't find anything).

 

Holly

----------

Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

________________________________

To: rd-usa

Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 3:52:17 AM

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

 

Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

> **

>

>

> Carol,

>

> It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

>

> I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> don't buy the party line?

>

> Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

>

> I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> effective.

>

> Regards,

> pam

>

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@...

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

> > ,

> >

> > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> >

> > Pam:

> >

> > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> to

> > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > fashion in which you did.

> >

> > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> 50%

> > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> >

> > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> going

> > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> contrary

> > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> can

> > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> base

> > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> in

> > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> not

> > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> >

> >

> >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> think

> >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> >> for

> >> it.

> >>

> >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> be

> >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> some

> >> data first, not testimonials.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> many

> >> on

> >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> informed

> >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> expert

> >> on

> >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> professionally,

> >> to

> >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> diets

> >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> >> should

> >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> >> all

> >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> >> value

> >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> why

> >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> >> just

> >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> appreciate,

> >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> >> being

> >>> scrutinized by others.

> >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> >>>

> >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> >> moments

> >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> >> truth,

> >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>> To: rd-usa

> >>>> From: pcharney@...

> >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> >>>

> >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> >>>>

> >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> instance

> >> in

> >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> many

> >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> >>>>

> >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> >> EBM

> >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> >>> systematic reviews?

> >>>>

> >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> >> useful.

> >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> >> keep

> >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> the

> >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> they

> >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> when

> >>> regular diets are withheld.

> >>>>

> >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> >> system

> >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> >> because

> >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> >> days;

> >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> >> results

> >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> are

> >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> studies,

> >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> >>>>

> >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> >> research.

> >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> >> 1920s,

> >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> time

> >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> died.

> >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> >> human

> >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> We

> >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> the

> >>> earth.

> >>>>

> >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> >> controlled

> >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> >> that

> >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> Why?

> >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> of

> >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> >>>>

> >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> have

> >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> anyone

> >>> would be opposed to that?

> >>>>

> >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> >>>> Author, Consultant

> >>>> pcharney@...

> >>>>

> >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> >> ask;

> >>>

> >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> >>> NEVER

> >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> >>> THOUGHT

> >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> >>> in

> >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> >>> pudding,

> >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> >>> for

> >>>>> that?

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> >>>>> Fax:

> >>>>> DineRight4@...

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> >> Co-author

> >>> of the

> >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>

> >>>>> _

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

> http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaM\

Ti7GYQ

>Q

> >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> ,

> >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> >>> cautious

> >>>>>> about.

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> >> Coaching

> >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> >>>>> (

> >>>

> >>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn\

6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>w

> >>>>> )

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> >>> future

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> >>> liver

> >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> >> up

> >>>>> IMHO.

> >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> >> and

> >>>

> >>>>> over

> >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That's perfect!  Liquid is a texture modification to MNT.  So the old " Full

Liquid Diet " is a version of a " high lactose/high fat " foods. (tongue in cheek).

 

Holly

----------

Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

Re: The Great Cancer

Hoax -

>>                        extended thru 6/20

>>                        But are they doing things like adrenal

>>                        fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>>

>>                liver

>>

>>                        detox, homeopathy and this type of

medicine -

>>                        red flags should be up

>>

>>                    IMHO.

>>

>>                        As should traditional medicine MDs when

>>                        excessive and unwarranted and

>>

>>                    over

>>

>>                        prescribing drugs.

>>

>>                    [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

>>                    [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]

>>

>>

>>

>>               

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That's why it's no longer recommended.

Pam Charney, PhD, RD

Affiliate Associate Professor

Pharmacy

MS Student

Clinical Informatics and Patient Centered Technology

School of Nursing

University of Washington

Seattle, WA

pcharney@...

http://www.linkedin.com/in/pamcharney

> Nope, the BRAT diet has no research behind it. Ten years ago I had a

> pediatrician hospitalist who wanted to get rid of it in our hospital so I did

> some digging looking for it and couldn't find anything).

>

> Holly

> ----------

> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>

> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>

> ________________________________

>

> To: rd-usa

> Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 3:52:17 AM

> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>

>

> Wonder if the BRAT diet ever had any research on it???

>

>

>

> > **

> >

> >

> > Carol,

> >

> > It's interesting that noone noticed that I acknowledged Jan for being a

> > sharp RD, meaning she's very bright. Thus, seemed to me out of character to

> > display an anti-science bias. Nutrition is an art and a science. Most of us

> > have a BS, right? That means bachelor of science.

> >

> > I spent 10 years in the military. As a female officer in a male-dominated

> > world, I learned quickly that in order to be heard, one speaks one's mind. I

> > don't sugar coat my thoughts. Some days I wonder if RDs are where they are

> > because we do everything possible to avoid being criticized. I'm a big girl,

> > I can take it. I'm pretty sure Jan is also. I did not criticize her, I was

> > curious about why she made certain comments. If we are to fear offending

> > others with critique of comments, then I guess this list is not based on

> > discussion and information seeking - rather there is no need for those who

> > don't buy the party line?

> >

> > Please don't judge my career until you know a bit about it. That's not

> > playing fair. I'm sorry that you feel there are " echelons " of dietetics and

> > that you are not respected because of your level of education. Eleanor

> > Roosevelt once said " No one can make you feel inferior without your

> > permission " . I had over 20 years experience as a clinical RD, Clinical

> > Nutrition Manager, pediatric RD, nutrition support RD, and administrator

> > before I went back to school for my PhD. So, yes, I have walked in your

> > shoes. And note, I am most certainly NOT using full liquid diets. In fact,

> > it's been over 15 years since I last wrote the words " full liquid diet " .

> >

> > I don't have the time to argue in favor of EBM. Please take a look at the

> > resources I suggested. There is certainly a place for EBM in the CAM world.

> > But first we need to see the studies done. Some are out there already and

> > probably have a 50 50 split in favor of and not in favor of some popular

> > therapies. Also, EBM does not mean " let's justify spending more money on

> > pharmaceuticals " . Remember a few years ago a systematic review demonstrated

> > that there is really no place for antibiotics as first line therapy for

> > otitis media in small children. That's right, EMB experts told pediatricians

> > and parents that there was no need for antibiotics. At the end of the day,

> > guess who was most upset? Parents who demanded antibiotics. Very recently

> > another EBM project came out against an expensive (and popular) therapy for

> > back injuries. Again, EBM showed that less, not more treatment was more

> > effective.

> >

> > Regards,

> > pam

> >

> >

> > Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> > Author, Consultant

> > pcharney@...

> >

> > " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> >

> >

> >

> > > ,

> > >

> > > Here I thought I was the only one that was skeptical about LEAP.

> > >

> > > Pam:

> > >

> > > Your reply to Jan was surprising. I am the first to admit that I do not

> > > always agree with Jan. However, indirectly, your reply only contributes

> > to

> > > my impression that there is a bias between the upper echelon educated

> > > dietitians and lower echelon educated dietitians. I am most certainly

> > > outspoken, but I don't think I could have ever replied publicly in the

> > > fashion in which you did.

> > >

> > > As a dietitian who spends 50% of her time in rehabilitative medicine and

> > 50%

> > > with longer care and with some very aggressive speech therapists, I agree

> > > with Digna and . I have not eliminated Full Liquid diet from our

> > > approved diets for exactly the reasons both Digna and stated.

> > >

> > > Quite frankly, if I may turn the tables: ly, Pam, I'm surprised that

> > > someone as sharp as you would be so uninformed about medical nutritional

> > > therapy outside of the box. In rehabilitative nutritional care and

> > > nutrition care for the dementia and Alzheimers, it appears you have

> > > forgotten that there are most certainly times that EBM contradicts the

> > > actual practice I select your reply as an example of how dietitians, in

> > > general, have a tendency to NOT to think outside of the box. Are you

> > going

> > > to deny a person nutrition because what the patient can tolerate is

> > contrary

> > > to EBM when it comes to a Full Liquid diet? Wouldn't that go against the

> > > premise of " Do No Harm? " Throw the unfounded the rumors to the wind. If a

> > > patient cannot tolerate anything other than full liquids - for whatever

> > > reason - will ultimately result in starvation. Sure, that is the extreme

> > > outcome. But it is far better to give real food in a texture the person

> > can

> > > tolerate than some commercial canned nutrition supplement. Of course we

> > base

> > > our standards of care on EBM, but sometimes there are EBM that we have to

> > > interpret, extrapolate for the individual person. The individualized care

> > > is what we all supposed to be about, if I am not mistaken "

> > > Your reply, as condescending as it was, makes me cringe that I am a

> > > professional in a professional organization that would treat each other

> > in

> > > this manner. My primary goal is the patient. If the patient needs a full

> > > liquid, I am going to make sure I get them a full liquid, even though it

> > > might be contrary to EBM. I do hope that people who are reading this

> > > realize that looking down their educational nose to their colleagues is

> > not

> > > how to make friends and amicable colleagues.

> > >

> > >

> > >> Full liquid is still useful with speech pathologists. It can also be

> > >> interpreted in many ways - full liquid thicken - honey, nectar etc. I

> > think

> > >> it is the inappropriate use that should be looked at, not some real uses

> > >> for

> > >> it.

> > >>

> > >> Interesting people are upset with Pam but not for LEAP. When are real

> > >> studies going to be done - not saying it doesn't work but maybe it could

> > be

> > >> EBM if the LEAP company and therapists would do some studies and have it

> > >> published. Just a thought...I would love to recommend it but I do want

> > some

> > >> data first, not testimonials.

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>> Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

> > >>> harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold

> > many

> > >> on

> > >>> the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all

> > informed

> > >>> 100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an

> > expert

> > >> on

> > >>> every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy,

> > professionally,

> > >> to

> > >>> anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq

> > diets

> > >>> are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it

> > >> should

> > >>> not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with

> > >> all

> > >>> do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

> > >>> practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a

> > >> value

> > >>> to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats

> > why

> > >>> they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is

> > >> just

> > >>> wrong all across the board is wrong too.

> > >>> Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly

> > appreciate,

> > >>> but we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of

> > >> being

> > >>> scrutinized by others.

> > >>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

> > >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

> > >>>

> > >>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

> > >> moments

> > >>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

> > >> truth,

> > >>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> > >>>

> > >>>

> > >>>> To: rd-usa

> > >>>> From: pcharney@...

> > >>>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> > >>>

> > >>>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

> > >>> uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one

> > instance

> > >> in

> > >>> one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so

> > many

> > >>> unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on

> > >> EBM

> > >>> that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

> > >>> Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

> > >>> systematic reviews?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be

> > >> useful.

> > >>> I would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to

> > >> keep

> > >>> it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to

> > the

> > >>> physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are

> > they

> > >>> evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization

> > when

> > >>> regular diets are withheld.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare

> > >> system

> > >>> that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just

> > >> because

> > >>> one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these

> > >> days;

> > >>> RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good

> > >> results

> > >>> compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that

> > are

> > >>> evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort

> > studies,

> > >>> case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of

> > >> research.

> > >>> Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the

> > >> 1920s,

> > >>> there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that

> > time

> > >>> type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients

> > died.

> > >>> Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar,

> > >> human

> > >>> use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes.

> > We

> > >>> don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to

> > the

> > >>> earth.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized

> > >> controlled

> > >>> trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined

> > >> that

> > >>> there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

> > >>> mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

> > >>> factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

> > >>> practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle.

> > Why?

> > >>> There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area

> > of

> > >>> science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

> > >>> before you try something new or different on real people you should

> > have

> > >>> some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure

> > anyone

> > >>> would be opposed to that?

> > >>>>

> > >>>> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> > >>>> Author, Consultant

> > >>>> pcharney@...

> > >>>>

> > >>>> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I

> > >> ask;

> > >>>

> > >>>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

> > >>> NEVER

> > >>>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

> > >>> THOUGHT

> > >>>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend

> > >>> in

> > >>>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk,

> > >>> pudding,

> > >>>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

> > >>> for

> > >>>>> that?

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> > >>>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

> > >>>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> > >>>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

> > >>>>> (Mountain Time)

> > >>>>> Fax:

> > >>>>> DineRight4@...

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> > >>>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions.

> > >> Co-author

> > >>> of the

> > >>>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> _

> > >>>

> > >>

> > http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> > >>>>> (

> > >>>

> > >>

> > http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> > >>>

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> > >>>>> (

> > >>>

> > >>

>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDcGaM\

Ti7GYQ

> >Q

> > >>>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> ,

> > >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> > >>> cautious

> > >>>>>> about.

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> > >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> > >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> > >> Coaching

> > >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> > >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> > >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> > >>>>> (

> > >>>

> > >>

>

>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn\

6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> >w

> > >>>>> )

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> > >>> future

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> > >>> liver

> > >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> > >> up

> > >>>>> IMHO.

> > >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> > >> and

> > >>>

> > >>>>> over

> > >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Here's a couple of resources.........

http://www.ndr-rd.com/resources/MRT%20Principles%20and%20Methods.pdf

 

http://www.susanlinke.com/_ACG_Study.pdf

 

 

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> ,

> > >>>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

> > >>> cautious

> > >>>>>> about.

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> > >>>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

> > >>>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition

> > >> Coaching

> > >>>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> > >>>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> > >>>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> _jpress50@..._

> > >>>>> (

> > >>>

> > >>

> >

>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZaGxn6\

_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> > >>>>> )

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the

> > >>> future

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >>>>>>

> > >>>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> > >>> liver

> > >>>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> > >> up

> > >>>>> IMHO.

> > >>>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> > >> and

> > >>>

> > >>>>> over

> > >>>>>> prescribing drugs.

> > >>>>>

> > >>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Merav thank you. I had remained silent throughout the rest of this

discussion after my one comment on how I use the FL diet wasn't answered, bc

I figured that it was just one voice, from a SNF/LTC practitioner, and this

topic was applicable to a more scholastic and technical clinician than me.

However, you have said a couple of really important things. First of all, we

all have a right to our opinions, however different they all are, since our

opinions are based on our previous training, and current practice and

experience. Mine has been in food production management and LTC. As such, I

have found a FL diet invaluable in both restarting PO feedings in the very

frail elders, and also a very kind and non-invasive way of providing a bit

of nourishment for the end-of-life hospice patient, and lot of comfort to

their families who can't understand or accept starvation. EVM or not, I

stand in front of and with these ppl every day I work, and won't do it any

differently.

Like you, Merav, I read most of the posts, and appreciate professionals like

Pam who give so generously of their knowledge. Whenever I need answers,

they're there.

Digna

From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of

Merav Levi

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:46 AM

To: rd-usa

Subject: RE: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold many on

the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all informed

100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an expert on

every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy, professionally, to

anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq diets

are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it should

not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with all

do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a value

to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats why

they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is just

wrong all across the board is wrong too.

Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly appreciate, but

we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of being

scrutinized by others.

Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

" Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments

that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the truth,

they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

> From: pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com>

> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>

> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one instance in

one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so many

unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

>

> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on EBM

that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

systematic reviews?

>

> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be useful. I

would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to keep

it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to the

physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are they

evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization when

regular diets are withheld.

>

> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare system

that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just because

one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these days;

RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good results

compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that are

evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort studies,

case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

>

> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of research.

Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the 1920s,

there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that time

type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients died.

Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar, human

use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes. We

don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to the

earth.

>

> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized controlled

trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined that

there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle. Why?

There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area of

science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

>

> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

before you try something new or different on real people you should have

some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure anyone

would be opposed to that?

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com>

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

>

>

>

> On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Dineright4@...

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> wrote:

>

> >

> > Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >

> > For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I ask;

> > Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

NEVER

> > found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

THOUGHT

> > that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >

> > I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend in

> > CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk, pudding,

> > cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >

> > I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >

> > Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

for

> > that?

> >

> >

> > Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> > Director of Medical Nutrition

> > Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> > Telecommuting Nationwide

> > (Mountain Time)

> > Fax:

> > DineRight4@... <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

> >

> > Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> > migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

of the

> > Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >

> > Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >

> >

_http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >

(http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >

> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >

(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdD

cGaMTi7GYQ

> > qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ,

> > > Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

cautious

> > > about.

> > >

> > > Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> > > The NATURAL dietitian

> > > Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

> > > and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> > > Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> > > Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> > >

> > > _jpress50@..._

> >

(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZ

aGxn6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> > )

> > >

> > > If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the future

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >

> > > But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

liver

> > > detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

> > IMHO.

> > > As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

> > over

> > > prescribing drugs.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Merav thank you. I had remained silent throughout the rest of this

discussion after my one comment on how I use the FL diet wasn't answered, bc

I figured that it was just one voice, from a SNF/LTC practitioner, and this

topic was applicable to a more scholastic and technical clinician than me.

However, you have said a couple of really important things. First of all, we

all have a right to our opinions, however different they all are, since our

opinions are based on our previous training, and current practice and

experience. Mine has been in food production management and LTC. As such, I

have found a FL diet invaluable in both restarting PO feedings in the very

frail elders, and also a very kind and non-invasive way of providing a bit

of nourishment for the end-of-life hospice patient, and lot of comfort to

their families who can't understand or accept starvation. EVM or not, I

stand in front of and with these ppl every day I work, and won't do it any

differently.

Like you, Merav, I read most of the posts, and appreciate professionals like

Pam who give so generously of their knowledge. Whenever I need answers,

they're there.

Digna

From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of

Merav Levi

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 10:46 AM

To: rd-usa

Subject: RE: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

Pam,I am sorry to be the one who says that, but I am very surprised how

harsh and " personal " your response was. these kind of responses hold many on

the list from participating in active discussion. We are not all informed

100% on 100% of the topics, and no one should be expected to be an expert on

every single topic. It is impossible and very unhealthy, professionally, to

anyone,to assume they " know all " .Sometimes clear liquid or full liq diets

are the only thing pts can tolerate and its better then NPO, and it should

not be used more then few days bc it is nutritionally lacking. But with all

do respect to EBM - textbook and studies are not case study and real

practice. Pts are not textbook nor a study, and even in EMB there is a value

to case studies. Respected journals publish them all the time. thats why

they are called case studies. and to say that clear of full liq diet is just

wrong all across the board is wrong too.

Pam, your knowledge and experience are priceless and greatly appreciate, but

we need to leave room for ppl to ask freely, without the fear of being

scrutinized by others.

Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

" Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments

that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the truth,

they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

> From: pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com>

> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:24 -0700

> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>

> ly, Jan, I'm surprised that someone as sharp as you would be so

uninformed about evidence-based medicine and that you select one instance in

one facility in order to justify an anti-science bias. There are so many

unfounded rumors surrounding use of evidence to support practice.

>

> Please take a look at the many outstanding resources and tutorials on EBM

that are available, such as the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine,

Bandolier, and others. Have you looked at the Cochrane Library for

systematic reviews?

>

> The full liquid diet has been shown in several studies to not be useful. I

would argue that it is not the physician who is leading the charge to keep

it, rather it's the RD who does not have the gumption to stand up to the

physician and explain that full liquid diets are not useful, nor are they

evidence-based. In fact, there is a trend to longer hospitalization when

regular diets are withheld.

>

> It is not only RDs who " insist " on using EBM. We have a healthcare system

that can no longer afford to pay for treatments and therapies just because

one clinician " gets good results " (that's my favorite pet peeve these days;

RDs who say " I get good results when I ....... " My question is " good results

compared to what? " ). CMS is moving towards paying for treatments that are

evidence-based. Where the evidence does not exist, strong cohort studies,

case series, etc can stand in until the research is done.

>

> EBM also does not mean that everything we do must have tons of research.

Look at insulin. When insulin was first isolated and produced in the 1920s,

there were no cries for randomized controled trials. Rather, at that time

type 1 diabetes had a 100% fatality rate. Lacking insulin, patients died.

Thus, knowing that insulin was the hormone that lowered blood sugar, human

use began. I sort of liken that to the use of parachutes in airplanes. We

don't need a trial to know that parachutes prevent fatal plummets to the

earth.

>

> The history of EBM is fascinating. The first known randomized controlled

trial was that done by Lind in the Royal Navy when he determined that

there was some factor in citrus fruits that prevented scurvy. In the

mid-1800s, Semmelweis proved that hand washing was a strong preventive

factor for puerperal fever. In both cases, it took over 50 years for

practice to change. In fact, we still fight the handwashing battle. Why?

There are many theories and change management is a relatively new area of

science. Basically, change is easy..... if the change is easy.

>

> Evidence based medicine, or evidence based practice, simply says that

before you try something new or different on real people you should have

some evidence that you will not hurt them Do no harm. I'm not sure anyone

would be opposed to that?

>

> Pam Charney, PhD, RD

> Author, Consultant

> pcharney@... <mailto:pcharney%40mac.com>

>

> " Lead, follow, or get out of the way! "

>

>

>

>

>

>

> On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:22 PM, Dineright4@...

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> wrote:

>

> >

> > Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

> >

> > For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I ask;

> > Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

NEVER

> > found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

THOUGHT

> > that practice was stopped years ago!)

> >

> > I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend in

> > CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk, pudding,

> > cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

> >

> > I was embarrassed for my profession.

> >

> > Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

for

> > that?

> >

> >

> > Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

> > Director of Medical Nutrition

> > Signet Diagnostic Corp.

> > Telecommuting Nationwide

> > (Mountain Time)

> > Fax:

> > DineRight4@... <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

> >

> > Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

> > migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

of the

> > Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

> >

> > Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> >

> >

_http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

> >

(http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

> >

> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly <_Jpress50@..._

> >

(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdD

cGaMTi7GYQ

> > qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ) > wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ,

> > > Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be

cautious

> > > about.

> > >

> > > Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

> > > The NATURAL dietitian

> > > Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

> > > and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

> > > Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

> > > Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

> > >

> > > _jpress50@..._

> >

(http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZ

aGxn6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

> > )

> > >

> > > If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the future

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > >

> > > But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

liver

> > > detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

> > IMHO.

> > > As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

> > over

> > > prescribing drugs.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In my new professional life I work in " free " (for patients) clinics, and do

home visits for home-bound, high risk seniors. I would like to challenge all

researchers and academic professionals to survive in that environment as

many of us do. Flexibility is key, as well as getting down and relating to

the person in front of us, their reality right now, their life as it used to

be and not ever be again, and then, as practically as possible and within

whatever their understanding, resources, physical and mental ability and

finances are, help them survive now, do better in the time they have left,

and improve their quality of life. Outside of the laboratory it's the

outcomes that count, and in my reality it's the outcomes that get funded. Do

I push the line? Yes! Every single day. Do I violate my ethics and my SOP?

ABSOLUTELY NOT! And if not for those of us that are willing and able to do

this, where would these ppl be now? The research lab to provide more EBM.

I'm not upset with anybody. I admire Pam and respect her expertise, which is

why I always read every one of her posts. I know little to nothing about

LEAP and probably never will know more bc it's not my area of interest and

know I won't practice it, so I just acknowledge it and respect it as well.

Facts change, statistics change, and as everyone knows, daily technology

changes. So we just have to stay on top of it, respect each other for what

we each can do and contribute. That's the way it's been since the first

little one-cell micro-organism was spun. Without that one, we wouldn't be

here. It's the way of the universe.

So folks, let's chill, listen more than we speak, and remember, no question

is stupid except that one nobody asked.

Digna

Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > > > >

> > > > > But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> > liver

> > > > > detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> up

> > > > IMHO.

> > > > > As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> and

> >

> > > > over

> > > > > prescribing drugs.

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In my new professional life I work in " free " (for patients) clinics, and do

home visits for home-bound, high risk seniors. I would like to challenge all

researchers and academic professionals to survive in that environment as

many of us do. Flexibility is key, as well as getting down and relating to

the person in front of us, their reality right now, their life as it used to

be and not ever be again, and then, as practically as possible and within

whatever their understanding, resources, physical and mental ability and

finances are, help them survive now, do better in the time they have left,

and improve their quality of life. Outside of the laboratory it's the

outcomes that count, and in my reality it's the outcomes that get funded. Do

I push the line? Yes! Every single day. Do I violate my ethics and my SOP?

ABSOLUTELY NOT! And if not for those of us that are willing and able to do

this, where would these ppl be now? The research lab to provide more EBM.

I'm not upset with anybody. I admire Pam and respect her expertise, which is

why I always read every one of her posts. I know little to nothing about

LEAP and probably never will know more bc it's not my area of interest and

know I won't practice it, so I just acknowledge it and respect it as well.

Facts change, statistics change, and as everyone knows, daily technology

changes. So we just have to stay on top of it, respect each other for what

we each can do and contribute. That's the way it's been since the first

little one-cell micro-organism was spun. Without that one, we wouldn't be

here. It's the way of the universe.

So folks, let's chill, listen more than we speak, and remember, no question

is stupid except that one nobody asked.

Digna

Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

> > > > >

> > > > > But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

> > liver

> > > > > detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be

> up

> > > > IMHO.

> > > > > As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted

> and

> >

> > > > over

> > > > > prescribing drugs.

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Joanne,

We have corresponded a lot in the past regarding my contributions as a

" reader " for some of the ADA publications. I'm surprised you include my

comments in your comment about " attacking a person " . I am merely, as you did

, stating my personal professional experiences. Just to clarify for me,

please let me know the statement I made that was considered a personal

attack against someone so I can make sure I do not use that type of

statement again.

Thanks.

Digna

From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of

Joanne Larsen

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:18 PM

To: rd-usa

Cc: Ortiz

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

, et al,

My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a full liquid

diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to regular.

If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the recommendation

of the dietitian to order the appropriate consistency using real food

first, then liquid supplements whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack the person

please.

IMHO

healthy regards,

Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav Levi<meravls@...

<mailto:meravls%40msn.com> > wrote:

>

>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>

>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>

>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

moments

>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

truth,

>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>

>>

>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>> CC: hlbrewer@... <mailto:hlbrewer%40yahoo.com>

>> From: joanne@... <mailto:joanne%40dietitian.com>

>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Colleagues,

>>

>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my permission to forward.

>>

>>

>>

>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual, vetted the authors

>>

>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial launch and the first

>>

>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in NCM. Dietitians

>>

>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that their facility's

>>

>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher insisted the full

>>

>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and documentation that

>>

>> there is no science in published literature for a full liquid diet or a

>>

>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft to regular diets.

>>

>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of a diet being

>>

>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>

>>

>>

>> healthy regards,

>>

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet list this month - just

>>> have to

>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated " and a few damn

>>> surgeons to stop

>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the Nutrition Care Manual

>>> online

>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no evidence for it).

>>> Holly

>>> ----------

>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>> ________________________________

>>> From: " Dineright4@... <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> "

>>> <Dineright4@... <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>>

>>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>> based?

>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I ask;

>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

NEVER

>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend in

>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk, pudding,

>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

for

>>> that?

>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>> (Mountain Time)

>>> Fax:

>>> DineRight4@... <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

<mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

>>> of the

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>> _

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>

>>> (

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>

>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>> (

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDc

GaMTi7GYQ

>>

>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>>> ,

>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be cautious

>>>> about.

>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>

>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>> (

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZa

Gxn6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>

>>> )

>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the future

>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>> liver

>>

>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

>>> IMHO.

>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

>>> over

>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Joanne,

We have corresponded a lot in the past regarding my contributions as a

" reader " for some of the ADA publications. I'm surprised you include my

comments in your comment about " attacking a person " . I am merely, as you did

, stating my personal professional experiences. Just to clarify for me,

please let me know the statement I made that was considered a personal

attack against someone so I can make sure I do not use that type of

statement again.

Thanks.

Digna

From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of

Joanne Larsen

Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:18 PM

To: rd-usa

Cc: Ortiz

Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

, et al,

My comment below was to clarify the lack of evidence for a full liquid

diet as a progressive diet from clear to soft to regular.

If a patient cannot tolerate solid food, it should be the recommendation

of the dietitian to order the appropriate consistency using real food

first, then liquid supplements whether that be liquid, pureed or ground.

If we are to disagree, disagree with a position, not attack the person

please.

IMHO

healthy regards,

Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

> Joanne and others: What would you have instead??

>

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Merav Levi<meravls@...

<mailto:meravls%40msn.com> > wrote:

>

>> This conversation reached a new low.Ciao

>>

>> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDNA dietitian, not the food police.

>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi

>>

>> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the

moments

>> that take your breath away. " - Carlin " People don't forget the

truth,

>> they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road)

>>

>>

>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>> CC: hlbrewer@... <mailto:hlbrewer%40yahoo.com>

>> From: joanne@... <mailto:joanne%40dietitian.com>

>> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:26:55 -0600

>> Subject: Re: Full Liquid Diet? Evidence based?

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Colleagues,

>>

>> Reply to RD-USA listserv only. You do not have my permission to forward.

>>

>>

>>

>> As the editor who created the Nutrition Care Manual, vetted the authors

>>

>> / reviewers and edited every word for the initial launch and the first

>>

>> update, I can tell you why the Full Liquid diet is in NCM. Dietitians

>>

>> who ordered NCM complained to the publisher that their facility's

>>

>> doctors wanted a full liquid diet so the publisher insisted the full

>>

>> liquid diet be added to NCM over my objections and documentation that

>>

>> there is no science in published literature for a full liquid diet or a

>>

>> progression from clear liquid to full liquid to soft to regular diets.

>>

>> This and clear liquid diets are the only instance of a diet being

>>

>> inserted in NCM that are not evidence or research based.

>>

>>

>>

>> healthy regards,

>>

>> Joanne Larsen MS RD LD

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>> In our facility we're deleting it from our diet list this month - just

>>> have to

>>> get the nurses to stop " advancing as tolerated " and a few damn

>>> surgeons to stop

>>> ordering it. But it can still be found in the Nutrition Care Manual

>>> online

>>> (pdf about what it is and that there is no evidence for it).

>>> Holly

>>> ----------

>>> Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

>>> Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

>>> Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

>>> Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

>>> 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

>>> Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

>>> ________________________________

>>> From: " Dineright4@... <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com> "

>>> <Dineright4@... <mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>

<mailto:Dineright4%40aol.com>>

>>> To: rd-usa <mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

<mailto:rd-usa%40yahoogroups.com>

>>> Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 10:22:25 PM

>>> Subject: The Great Cancer Hoax - Full Liquid Diet? Evidence

>>> based?

>>> Too busy lately, so getting into this discussion late.

>>> For all the RDs that SAY they insist on Evidence Based Medicine, I ask;

>>> Show me the evidence for hospitals to serve full liquid diets. I've

NEVER

>>> found it, but tens of thousands of RDs nationwide still do this. (I

>>> THOUGHT

>>> that practice was stopped years ago!)

>>> I don't work in hospitals anymore, but recently was visiting a friend in

>>> CCU for GI bleed with a full liquid diet on his plate. 2% milk, pudding,

>>> cream of potato soup, and ice cream.

>>> I was embarrassed for my profession.

>>> Please, would some RD that insists on EBM please show me the evidence

for

>>> that?

>>> Jan Patenaude, RD, CLT

>>> Director of Medical Nutrition

>>> Signet Diagnostic Corp.

>>> Telecommuting Nationwide

>>> (Mountain Time)

>>> Fax:

>>> DineRight4@... <mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

<mailto:DineRight4%40aol.com>

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist and specialist in food sensitivity for IBS,

>>> migraine, fibromyalgia and multiple inflammatory conditions. Co-author

>>> of the

>>> Certified LEAP Therapist (CLT) Training Course.

>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>> _

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/_

>>

>>> (

>>

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/fatigued-by-a-fake-disease/)

>>

>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jacqui Pressly<_Jpress50@..._

>>> (

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=gJl7O9-0Wsq_2MXaOdDc

GaMTi7GYQ

>>

>>> qfD4nP2Os6mSiBLs_6OsOEUFIunjUNDecytZLrYhlHZ)> wrote:

>>>> ,

>>>> Where is it that this dx doesn't exist? That's what I would be cautious

>>>> about.

>>>> Jacquelyn A. Pressly, RD, CLT

>>>> The NATURAL dietitian

>>>> Specializing in Wellness and Prevention, Personal Nutrition Coaching

>>>> and Designer Lifestyle Plans to help you get on the health track

>>>> Northeast Ohio & Western Pennsylvania

>>>> Internet and telecounseling available for distance clients

>>>>

>>>> _jpress50@..._

>>> (

>>

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/rd-usa/post?postID=2n1nW2HOEaLO84cXflZa

Gxn6_ABLxdnwkd6i4Xoi6_FNA0sRcNMgb3hQgncOHblofIntwCHgp7gClw

>>

>>> )

>>>> If you are what you eat, then dietitians are the doctors of the future

>>>> Re: The Great Cancer Hoax - extended thru 6/20

>>>> But are they doing things like adrenal fatigue (dx doesn't exist),

>> liver

>>

>>>> detox, homeopathy and this type of medicine - red flags should be up

>>> IMHO.

>>>> As should traditional medicine MDs when excessive and unwarranted and

>>> over

>>>> prescribing drugs.

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...