Guest guest Posted March 18, 2008 Report Share Posted March 18, 2008 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2007;15(2):159-62 Staged bilateral hip or knee arthroplasties FR Hashmi, K Barlas, CF Mann, FR Howell Department of Orthopaedics, Princess of Wales Hospital, Scartho Road, Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Purpose. To compare the operating time, amount of blood transfused, length of hospital stay, and early complications (within 6 months) between 2- week staged bilateral arthroplasties and matched randomised controls undergoing unilateral arthroplasties. Methods. From October 1992 to October 2000, 90 patients who underwent bilateral hip or knee arthroplasties with a 2-week interval were compared with matched randomised controls undergoing unilateral arthroplasties. A single surgeon performed all procedures. Results. After the match-up process, 30 pairs of patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the operating times, amount of blood transfused, and early complication rates. The mean difference in length of hospital stay was significant (t= –3.552, df=29, p<0.001). Conclusion. Compared to staged procedures with an interval months apart, staged sequential arthroplasty with a 7- to 10-day interval during one hospital admission is more efficient, as it facilitates earlier rehabilitation without higher complication rates, and entails shorter hospital stays. ************************************************* Read the entire article here: http://www.josonline.org/pdf/v15i2p159.pdf -- Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.