Guest guest Posted July 14, 2011 Report Share Posted July 14, 2011 Thank you for the post. I am intrigued by research that analyzes the evolution of the human diet. As more and more data is collected and analyzed, it is clear there was/is no perfect healthy diet. Having said that, I do believe that current dietary advice (40-60+%+ Carb - push whole grain, but no push for natural unprocessed ww | =/<30% fat - low in trans, low in sat | 10-20% lean pro) is based on research done within the last 100 years, and unfortunately, doesn't take into account a lot of the evolutionary nutrition research findings. A fresh perspective I have been reading by several nutrition researchers focuses on what macro nutrients are in a human body, and what macro nutrients we use for fuel. Obviously there is variation from human to human, and there are metabolic pathways that allow us to turn macro nutrients into other macro nutrients, but this perspective leads one to " eat what you are made of/ what you use " vs " you are what you eat " . We are made up of mostly water, protein, fats, and minerals, other micro nutrients. The average human stored about 500 gm of glycogen and uses 400-600 kcals of carbohydrate a day. Many studies have shown that when humans chronically eat > 600 kcals of carbs/d, the carbs that cant move into glycogen storage (becasue glycogen storage is at capacity) and are not burned (because they are not active enough) are turned into saturated fat. Many folks eat a 600 kcal bagel every day before lunch. I am finding the concept of determining one's individual carb tolerance for blood sugar control and for weight control is critical for helping folks optimize their diets. Fascinating nutrition subject. Makes me wonder if down the road we will see insurance companies using elevated A1C and BMIs as criteria such as smoking to justify increased health insurance premiums. I am not in the know, perhaps they already do this? Osowski MS, RD, LD Registered Dietitian Diets of modern hunter-gatherers vary substantially in their carbohydrate conten http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531711000911 Diets of modern hunter-gatherers vary substantially in their carbohydrate content depending on ecoenvironments: results from an ethnographic analysis Ströhlelow asterisk, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and s Hahna a Nutrition Physiology and Human Nutrition Unit, Institute of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Leibniz University of Hannover, Hannover D-30167, Germany Received 18 March 2011; revised 30 April 2011; accepted 2 May 2011. Available online 12 June 2011. Abstract In the past, attempts have been made to estimate the carbohydrate contents of preagricultural human diets. Those estimations have primarily been based on interpretations of ethnographic data of modern hunter-gatherers. In this study, it was hypothesized that diets of modern hunter-gatherers vary in their carbohydrate content depending on ecoenvironments. Thus, using data of plant-to-animal subsistence ratios, we calculated the carbohydrate intake (percentage of the total energy) in 229 hunter-gatherer diets throughout the world and determined how differences in ecological environments altered carbohydrate intake. We found a wide range of carbohydrate intake ( & #8776;3%-50% of the total energy intake; median and mode, 16%-22% of the total energy). Hunter-gatherer diets were characterized by an identical carbohydrate intake (30%-35% of the total energy) over a wide range of latitude intervals (11°-40° north or south of the equator). However, with increasing latitude intervals from 41° to greater than 60°, carbohydrate intake decreased markedly from approximately equal to 20% to 9% or less of the total energy. Hunter-gatherers living in desert and tropical grasslands consumed the most carbohydrates ( & #8776;29%-34% of the total energy). Diets of hunter-gatherers living in northern areas (tundra and northern coniferous forest) contained a very low carbohydrate content ( & #8804;15% of the total energy). In conclusion, diets of hunter-gatherers showed substantial variation in their carbohydrate content. Independent of the local environment, however, the range of energy intake from carbohydrates in the diets of most hunter-gatherer societies was markedly different (lower) from the amounts currently recommended for healthy humans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 I have been reading about evolutionary nutrition and I find it a very interesting subject, this article says that humans can probably adapt to a wide variation of the ratio, protein, carbs, fats, and that what matters the most is the quality of the nutrients. I think the current guidelines hitting always in the same ratio for years are completely outdated. From what I know in USA refined carbs are the major part of the diet and there is too much processed food this pattern is spreading world wide. Catia > > > Thank you for the post. I am intrigued by research that analyzes the evolution of the human diet. > As more and more data is collected and analyzed, it is clear there was/is no perfect healthy diet. > Having said that, I do believe that current dietary advice (40-60+%+ Carb - push whole grain, but no push for natural unprocessed ww | =/<30% fat - low in trans, low in sat | 10-20% lean pro) > is based on research done within the last 100 years, and unfortunately, doesn't take into account a lot of the evolutionary nutrition research findings. > > A fresh perspective I have been reading by several nutrition researchers focuses on what macro nutrients are in a human body, and what macro nutrients we use for fuel. Obviously there is variation from human to human, and there are metabolic pathways that allow us to turn macro nutrients into other macro nutrients, but this perspective leads one to " eat what you are made of/ what you use " vs " you are what you eat " . > > We are made up of mostly water, protein, fats, and minerals, other micro nutrients. The average human stored about 500 gm of glycogen and uses 400-600 kcals of carbohydrate a day. Many studies have shown that when humans chronically eat > 600 kcals of carbs/d, the carbs that cant move into glycogen storage (becasue glycogen storage is at capacity) and are not burned (because they are not active enough) are turned into saturated fat. Many folks eat a 600 kcal bagel every day before lunch. > > I am finding the concept of determining one's individual carb tolerance for blood sugar control and for weight control is critical for helping folks optimize their diets. > Fascinating nutrition subject. > > Makes me wonder if down the road we will see insurance companies using elevated A1C and BMIs as criteria such as smoking to justify increased health insurance premiums. I am not in the know, perhaps they already do this? > > Osowski MS, RD, LD > Registered Dietitian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.