Guest guest Posted June 25, 2011 Report Share Posted June 25, 2011 Cheryl, since you're being brave and bold to stick your head out I will too. Throughout this debate, I've thought a great deal to that time when I was 14 and suffering from acute constant asthma. For a year I had a cow bell hanging by my bed that I could hit and ring at night any time I was unable to breath. Than bell could have waked the dead, but very importantly, it woke up my father and g/father, the 2 ppl that could give shots at my home. They both ran - my g/father in the lead being a light sleeper and closest to my bedroom - and stuck me with a needle full of epinephrine. Then my father pulled me up, rubbed my back, calmed me down, and rubbed my chest and back with Vicks-Vaporub. Once I started breathing again, my mother would spend the night sitting by my bed or I could not go back to sleep. Fast forward to a wonderful (not!) " vacation " in Baltimore at 's Hopkins hospital. What started out as a few days of testing, extended to a month as an out patient undergoing grueling allergy tests to determine what I was allergic and intolerant to that drove me into these episodes. My back was like a colander, and there was no more room to poke it, they worked on my arms and thighs. Finally I rebelled and they would have to drag me screaming and clawing trying to get away. I had arrived at 84 lbs. I left at 65 lbs. They did not help me with their torture. Most of what I was allergic to according to them was dust and pollen - huh? So what then? I lived in Puerto Rico. Move to one of the Poles? Or to the Sahara? Or perhaps live in a glass bubble? And although I am deathly allergic to shellfish - all crustaceans - if they tested for that they sure didn't notice it. I did test allergic to tunafish. At that time I had never eaten tunafish. It just wasn't a fish found in the Caribbean or southern Atlantic oceans, or prepared by us. It was considered (and I still do) the same as shark. Something to release or throw back to the other fishes. My opinion, totally anecdotal of course, is, if a less invasive methodology exists, that can help ppl, the use it. I will support it whether I want to use it for myself or not. Once the Earth was flat, and those that said differently were mercilessly punished and mocked. There are yet so many unsolved mysteries in every facet of the universe, we must applaud and encourage the pioneers, or we'll sit and rot and die a sure miserable death. I've said my one and only comment on this topic. I know if the " world ends " I'll be one of the survivors. Digna From: rd-usa [mailto:rd-usa ] On Behalf Of cherylharrisrd Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 6:34 PM To: rd-usa Subject: Re: LEAP Reply to (reply 3) I am questioning why I'm jumping into the fray, but here goes... I did LEAP years ago, and got quite a few false positives and false negatives. When I eliminated my reds and yellows, I saw little to no response. I found that ELISA targeted my food sensitivities more accurately, overall, and yet LEAP did point to a squash sensitivity I hadn't been able to nail down before that. Now, I'm just one person, and I don't for a second feel like that means that LEAP does, or doesn't work--one person does not reflect the accuracy of a test. As I've heard positive stories from others I've thought of doing the certification, but have not thus far because I feel like either I need to be able to vouch for the test either from observing myself or others, or point to studies. I do certainly understand the passion of people who have seen improvements themselves and in their clients.And while I've appreciated the enthusiasm I've seen in LEAP therapists, I've really been put off by the insistence it's the only test to use, since no one has pointed to anything concrete in the way of studies until now and the attitude seems to be that questioning is a problem, when it should be what all of us encourage. My clients question me--that's their job! I expect the same openness of questions from companies I work with. Asking interested, pointed questions is not naysaying--it's using your brain. The ideas behind LEAP truly make sense to me, and I look forward to seeing where the research goes. It takes guts to be a pioneer, and I salute you! Food for thought. Best, Cheryl , MPH, RD, LD Whole Health 3345 Duke Street, andria, VA 22314 9675-A Main Street, Fairfax, VA 22031 www.harriswholehealth.com fax: Follow me on Twitter @cherylharrisrd > > > > > > > > > > > > I am surprised that there are studies - but they can not be just > > > called > > > > > > " clinical studies " . (Look at all the scams with dietary supplements > > > and > > > > > > products and all they list is " testimonials " and " clinical > > > studies " .) I > > > > > > agree with Pam, take the small steps. It really needs to be done by > > > an > > > > > > unbiased researcher or reviewed by an unbiased researcher if you > > have > > > > > done > > > > > > it. The DASH diet for one has been validated in peer reviewed > > studies > > > but > > > > > > continues to be studied. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.