Guest guest Posted August 20, 2011 Report Share Posted August 20, 2011 LINK<http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/14/some-medical-tests-procedu\ res-do-more-harm-than-good.html> My conclusion is if people would eat healthier and at a more normal weight there would be less testing/medications, etc. I also think when people are overweight/obese we assume they must be unhealthy, which isn't always the case either. Thoughts???? *Some of the article:* " That less health care can lead to better health and, conversely, that more health care can harm health, runs counter to most patients’ conviction that screenings and treatments are inherently beneficial. That belief is fueled by the flood of new technologies and drugs that have reached the market in the past two or three decades, promising to prevent disease and extend life. Most of us wouldn’t think twice if our doctor offered a test that has the power to expose a lurking tumor, or a clogged artery, or a heart arrhythmia. Better to know—and get treated—than to take any risks, the reasoning goes. In fact, for many otherwise healthy people, tests often lead to more tests, which can lead to interventions based on a possible problem that may have gone away on its own or ultimately proved harmless. Patients can easily be fooled when a screening test detects, or an intervention treats, an abnormality, and their health improves, says cardiologist Lauer of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. In fact, says Lauer, that abnormality may not have been the cause of the problem or a threat to future health: “All you’ve done is misclassify someone with no disease as having disease.” " -- Ortiz, MS, RD *The FRUGAL Dietitian* <http://goog_1331050751> *Blog*<http://www.thefrugaldietitian.com> Check out my blog: mixture of deals and nutrition Join me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/TheFrugalDietitian?ref=ts> * " If it works and research proven, it wouldn't be called Alternative " * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2011 Report Share Posted August 20, 2011 I read the article this AM. Too many tests, like TMI get ignored. Tests without follow-up are useless; healthy life styles can be the follow-up. Frequently what happens is a medication is prescribed, then to justify the medication, a diagnosis is added to the chart. While I think monitoring is a good intervention, I see little monitoring of med effects. Raphaela > > LINK<http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/14/some-medical-tests-procedu\ res-do-more-harm-than-good.html> > > My conclusion is if people would eat healthier and at a more normal weight > there would be less testing/medications, etc. I also think when people are > overweight/obese we assume they must be unhealthy, which isn't always the > case either. > Thoughts???? > > *Some of the article:* > > " That less health care can lead to better health and, conversely, that more > health care can harm health, runs counter to most patients' conviction that > screenings and treatments are inherently beneficial. That belief is fueled > by the flood of new technologies and drugs that have reached the market in > the past two or three decades, promising to prevent disease and extend life. > Most of us wouldn't think twice if our doctor offered a test that has the > power to expose a lurking tumor, or a clogged artery, or a heart arrhythmia. > Better to know—and get treated—than to take any risks, the reasoning goes. > > In fact, for many otherwise healthy people, tests often lead to more tests, > which can lead to interventions based on a possible problem that may have > gone away on its own or ultimately proved harmless. Patients can easily be > fooled when a screening test detects, or an intervention treats, an > abnormality, and their health improves, says cardiologist Lauer of > the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. In fact, says Lauer, that > abnormality may not have been the cause of the problem or a threat to future > health: " All you've done is misclassify someone with no disease as having > disease. " " > > > -- > Ortiz, MS, RD > *The FRUGAL Dietitian* <http://goog_1331050751> > *Blog*<http://www.thefrugaldietitian.com> > Check out my blog: mixture of deals and nutrition > Join me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/TheFrugalDietitian?ref=ts> > * " If it works and research proven, it wouldn't be called Alternative " * > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2011 Report Share Posted August 20, 2011 I read the article this AM. Too many tests, like TMI get ignored. Tests without follow-up are useless; healthy life styles can be the follow-up. Frequently what happens is a medication is prescribed, then to justify the medication, a diagnosis is added to the chart. While I think monitoring is a good intervention, I see little monitoring of med effects. Raphaela > > LINK<http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/08/14/some-medical-tests-procedu\ res-do-more-harm-than-good.html> > > My conclusion is if people would eat healthier and at a more normal weight > there would be less testing/medications, etc. I also think when people are > overweight/obese we assume they must be unhealthy, which isn't always the > case either. > Thoughts???? > > *Some of the article:* > > " That less health care can lead to better health and, conversely, that more > health care can harm health, runs counter to most patients' conviction that > screenings and treatments are inherently beneficial. That belief is fueled > by the flood of new technologies and drugs that have reached the market in > the past two or three decades, promising to prevent disease and extend life. > Most of us wouldn't think twice if our doctor offered a test that has the > power to expose a lurking tumor, or a clogged artery, or a heart arrhythmia. > Better to know—and get treated—than to take any risks, the reasoning goes. > > In fact, for many otherwise healthy people, tests often lead to more tests, > which can lead to interventions based on a possible problem that may have > gone away on its own or ultimately proved harmless. Patients can easily be > fooled when a screening test detects, or an intervention treats, an > abnormality, and their health improves, says cardiologist Lauer of > the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. In fact, says Lauer, that > abnormality may not have been the cause of the problem or a threat to future > health: " All you've done is misclassify someone with no disease as having > disease. " " > > > -- > Ortiz, MS, RD > *The FRUGAL Dietitian* <http://goog_1331050751> > *Blog*<http://www.thefrugaldietitian.com> > Check out my blog: mixture of deals and nutrition > Join me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/TheFrugalDietitian?ref=ts> > * " If it works and research proven, it wouldn't be called Alternative " * > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.