Fw: CMS's Final Decision on Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Obesity

[Guest guest]

FYI

----------

Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE

Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator

Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV

Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com

301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX

Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009)

----- Forwarded Message -----

>

>To: hlbrewer@...

>Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 1:20 PM

>Subject: CMS's Final Decision on Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Obesity

>

>

>Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

>Hi, just a reminder that you're receiving this email because you have expressed

an interest in Nevada Dietetic Association. Don't forget to add

nevadard@... to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox!

>

>You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.

>

>

>CMS's Final Decision on Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Obesity and How it

Affects RD's 

>Dear Holly,

>

>

>

>The American Dietetic Association understands and shares members' concerns

about the announcement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on

Tuesday, November 29 about their decision to cover Intensive Behavioral

Counseling for Obesity for eligible Medicare beneficiaries. We'd like to share

the following information in an effort to answer member questions about this

decision and what it means for Registered Dietitians (RDs).

> 

>How did CMS make this decision?

> 

>Through the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), CMS

has the authority to add coverage of additional preventive services under a

process called a National Coverage Determination. This process is not a

legislative one, meaning the decision is not made through Congress. Rather, CMS

is the decision-making body. CMS is required to evaluate relevant clinical

evidence to determine whether or not the proposed service meets three criteria:

> 1. Reasonable and necessary for the prevention or early detection of illness

or disability;

> 2. Is recommended with a Grade A or B by the US Preventive Services Task

Force; and

> 3. Is appropriate for individuals entitled to benefits under Part A or

enrolled under Part B of the Medicare program.

> 

>The process includes two opportunities for public comment. On March 11, 2011

CMS announced it was opening a national coverage analysis for Intensive

Behavioral Therapy for Obesity with a 30-day public comment period. On August

31, 2011 CMS issued its proposed decision memorandum with a 30-day comment

period.

> 

>Was ADA involved?

> 

>Definitely! ADA offered comments during both public comment periods. These

comments incorporated input from members with expertise in weight management

services and were reviewed and approved by member leaders. Visit

http://www.eatright.org/mnt/ and scroll down to " Medicare MNT Coverage

Expansion " to read more. In November ADA also met with CMS staff, along with

other members of the Obesity Care Coalition, to advocate for inclusion of RDs in

the proposed benefit. 

> 

>What exactly did CMS decide to cover?

> 

>CMS determined it will cover screening and intensive behavioral counseling for

obesity by primary care providers in settings such as physicians' offices for

Medicare beneficiaries with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. Specifically,

Medicare will cover:

>* One face-to-face visit every week for the first month;

>* One face-to-face visit every other week for months 2-6;

>* One face-to-face visit every month for months 7-12, if the beneficiary has

achieved a reduction in weight of at least 3kg over the course of the first six

months of intensive therapy.

> 

>The service must be furnished by a " qualified primary care physician or other

primary care practitioner and in a primary care setting. " CMS refers to the

Social Security Act for its definition of a " qualified primary care physician "

to mean a physician who is a general practitioner, family practice practitioner,

general internist or obstetrician or gynecologist. In similar manner, CMS

defines " primary care practitioner " as a physician with a primary specialty

designation of family medicine, internal medicine, geriatric medicine or

pediatric medicine or a nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or

physician assistant in accordance with the Social Security Act.

> 

>Lastly, the service must be furnished in the primary care setting. CMS defines

a primary care setting " as one in which there is provision of integrated,

accessible health care services by clinicians who are accountable for addressing

a large majority of personal health care needs, developing a sustained

partnership with patients, and practicing in the context of family and

community. Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, ambulatory

surgical centers, independent diagnostic testing facilities, skilled nursing

facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and hospices are not considered

primary care settings under this definition. "

> 

>What was the rationale behind CMS's decision to not include RDs as providers of

these services?

> 

>Based on CMS's responses to public comments in this final decision memo as well

as the one issued earlier this month for Intensive Behavioral Counseling for

Cardiovascular Disease, it appears that CMS excluded RDs for two reasons:

> 1. CMS believes it lacks the statutory authority to include RDs as providers

outside of diabetes and end stage renal disease; and

> 2. CMS believes it is important that preventive services be furnished in a

coordinated approach as part of a comprehensive prevention plan within the

context of the patient's total health care. As such, they believe primary care

practitioners are best qualified to offer care in this context.

> 

>How will these services be paid and when does the benefit become effective?

> 

>The answers to these questions have yet to be determined. CMS is in the process

of establishing codes and developing the claims processing instructions for this

NCD.

> 

>What do we do now?

> 

>As individual practitioners:

>RDs as providers of nutrition services have 2 options when it comes to obesity

services for Part B Medicare beneficiaries:

> 1. The CMS decision memorandum does state that the new benefit does not

preclude primary care practitioners from referring eligible beneficiaries to

other practitioners and/or settings for counseling; however coverage remains

only in the primary care setting.   So RDs can receive referrals for these

services, but the Medicare beneficiary would need to be informed prior to

providing the service that it is not covered by Medicare and they would be

required to pay out of pocket for the service.

> 2. The CMS decision memorandum also states that in the primary care office

setting and primary care hospital outpatient setting, Medicare may cover these

services when furnished by auxiliary personnel (e.g., RDs) and billed as

" incident to " services in accordance with 42 CFR section 410.26( or 410.27,

meaning:

> 1. There is direct physician supervision of auxiliary personnel (the physician

must be present in the office suite and immediately available to provide

assistance and direction throughout the time the service is being provided).

> 2. " Auxiliary personnel " means any individual who is acting under the

supervision of a physician, regardless of whether the individual is an employee,

leased employee, or independent contractor of the physician, or of the legal

entity that employs or contracts with the physician.

>Note: Medicare Part B MNT services for diabetes and non-dialysis renal disease

cannot be billed as " incident to " services since they are recognized as a

separate benefit category.

> 

>We recognize that both of these options fall short of the ideal scenario.

However, as healthcare delivery and payment models move away from

fee-for-service to bundled payment models (such as Patient-Centered Medical

Homes and Accountable Care Organizations), now is a good time for RDs to align

themselves with primary care practitioners in new ways. Continue to market

yourself and your services to both primary care practitioners and Medicare

beneficiaries to create demand for your services and demonstrate the value you

bring to a comprehensive and coordinated model of care. As an RD, you can

positively impact a practice's bottom line by helping patients and the practice

achieve positive clinical outcomes. Most importantly, you can collect, report,

and publish outcomes data to strengthen the foundation of clinical evidence used

by CMS and others in making coverage decisions.

> 

>As ADA:

> 

>The Nutrition Services Coverage team and the Policy Initiatives and Advocacy

team are strategically working to position RDs as providers of MNT in other

disease conditions through a variety of initiatives.  With this new insight

into CMS's approach to expanding coverage, we are exploring potential strategies

on both the legislative and regulatory fronts. We will continue to share

information with members through all available communication channels.

> 

>Click here to read the full CMS Final Decision Memorandum.

> 

>Nutrition Services Coverage Team

>Reimburse@...

> 

> 

>Nevada Dietetic Association

>www.NevadaRD.com

>NevadaRD@...

> 

>

>Forward email

>

>This email was sent to hlbrewer@... by nevadard@... |  

>Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribeâ„¢ |

Privacy Policy.

>Nevada Dietetic Association| 120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2000| Chicago|

IL| 60606

>

>