Guest guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 Hi, I hope everyone is having a good Mothers Day.I have a question about TB and Orencia.At 15yrs old I tested pos.for TB.I was told that I didn't have the disease,but had come into contact with it.When I was dx. with RA,my rheummy sent me to an Infectious Disease specialist.He had me take 12 mths of antibiotics as treatment for TB,this should have been done 40 years ago,but it wasn't.Now this month I am suppose to start Orencia.I have researched TB and have found that the treatment I was given is standard.I just wonder,does the treatment protect me from getting active TB if I am on biologics? and if (God forbid) I do get it,what then? My rheummy is aware of all of my concerns and says I have to decide if the benefits out weighs the risks.I don't think I know how to do that.I hate the RA and all of its evil little friends,but do I need active tuberculosis as well? If anyone has advice or knows where I could find some answers,please let me know.Thanks,Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2008 Report Share Posted May 12, 2008 Sherry, what was the result of your most recent TB test? Did your arm get bumpy? [ ] TB and biologics??? Hi, I hope everyone is having a good Mothers Day.I have a question about TB and Orencia.At 15yrs old I tested pos.for TB.I was told that I didn't have the disease,but had come into contact with it.When I was dx. with RA,my rheummy sent me to an Infectious Disease specialist.He had me take 12 mths of antibiotics as treatment for TB,this should have been done 40 years ago,but it wasn't.Now this month I am suppose to start Orencia.I have researched TB and have found that the treatment I was given is standard.I just wonder,does the treatment protect me from getting active TB if I am on biologics? and if (God forbid) I do get it,what then? My rheummy is aware of all of my concerns and says I have to decide if the benefits out weighs the risks.I don't think I know how to do that.I hate the RA and all of its evil little friends,but do I need active tuberculosis as well? If anyone has advice or knows where I could find some answers,please let me know.Thanks, Sherry ________________________________________________________________________________\ ____ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 The skin test(PPD) I think it's called,is injected just under the skin on the inside of the forearm.Mine always turned red,was swollen and raised.I had to return to the MD office 24 hrs later and have the reaction checked.It was very positive.The nurse took measurements of the site and put that in my records. I have had the very same reaction every time I've been tested,(my first was in 1965) I really don't understand why no one ever put me on treatment. I was considered to have Latent TB.(non active) The research I've done on TB doesn't mention reactiveation with biologics,and the biologics sites don't mention " treated " TB.Got any ideas?Thanks,Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Hello Sherry, Hope I can help a bit. All this is very complicated. Also I apologise if this message does not travel well across the pond from the UK, I see one of my other postings had extra symbols!! Oh dear,sorry. By the way I'm writing as a retired doctor, and I am in this group on behalf of a friend who has bad RA and no computer access. Your positive skin tests showed that you had already developed healthy immunity by 1965 presumably by having exposure and reaction unknowingly to TB bacillus. Probably a chest X ray would have been asked for just to check that there was no sign of activity.Then you would have been reassured and just told you did not need BCG. Often but not always the X ray  might show a tiny calcified sign in the lung that TB bug had been 'seen off' without any problem and that would not be cause for any concern at all. In the olden days that finding would be a hallmark of all the healthy associates and relatives of someone ill  with TB. It was normal. They developed a natural body resistance by mounting an immune response. No treatment would be needed. The possible problem is only rarely  when the body defences are damped down later either by debilitating illnesses, or intentionally as with the biologics.That is why the screening test you had done is so important before starting treatment of that kind.  It is as a little like shingles that can occur from dormant Herpes zoster virus in the body years after having chickenpox as a child , when the immune system is damped down, even though in between it never caused any problem at all.That is what latent, non active, means.There is a possibility of being reactivated if the balance is upset. Think there is some very good recent evidence just coming out now of trials of people being treated with biologics successfully after having protective treatment for the latent TB first, but that is obviously where you need to discuss your own case with your specialist to weigh up pros and cons for you. Hope this helps Good luck Sherry from Chris [ ] Re: TB and biologics??? The skin test(PPD) I think it's called,is injected just under the skin on the inside of the forearm.Mine always turned red,was swollen and raised.I had to return to the MD office 24 hrs later and have the reaction checked.It was very positive.The nurse took measurements of the site and put that in my records. I have had the very same reaction every time I've been tested,(my first was in 1965) I really don't understand why no one ever put me on treatment. I was considered to have Latent TB.(non active) The research I've done on TB doesn't mention reactiveation with biologics,and the biologics sites don't mention " treated " TB.Got any ideas?Thanks, Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Sherry, The year of antibiotics was given to you to try to eradicate the latent TB. That should greatly reduce the chance that you will develop active TB. Unfortunately, there isn't much information about Orencia (abatacept) and TB reactivation yet since it is much newer than the better-studied anti-TNF biologics. I'll post what I can find related to this separately. Not an MD > [ ] TB and biologics??? > > Hi, I hope everyone is having a good Mothers Day.I have a question > about TB and Orencia.At 15yrs old I tested pos.for TB.I was told that I > didn't have the disease,but had come into contact with it.When I was > dx. with RA,my rheummy sent me to an Infectious Disease specialist.He > had me take 12 mths of antibiotics as treatment for TB,this should have > been done 40 years ago,but it wasn't.Now this month I am suppose to > start Orencia.I have researched TB and have found that the treatment I > was given is standard.I just wonder,does the treatment protect me from > getting active TB if I am on biologics? and if (God forbid) I do get > it,what then? My rheummy is aware of all of my concerns and says I have > to decide if the benefits out weighs the risks.I don't think I know how > to do that.I hate the RA and all of its evil little friends,but do I > need active tuberculosis as well? If anyone has advice or knows where I > could find some answers,please let me know.Thanks,Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2008 Report Share Posted May 13, 2008 Enbrel Gets " Black Box " Warning Biologic Drug's Infection Risk Warning Strengthened to " Black Box " Warning http://arthritis.webmd.com/news/20080501/enbrel-gets-black-box- warning?ecd=wnl_art_051208 Sue On Tuesday, May 13, 2008, at 01:21 PM, sherry elkins wrote: > The skin test(PPD) I think it's called,is injected just under the > skin on the inside of the forearm.Mine always turned red,was swollen > and raised.I had to return to the MD office 24 hrs later and have the > reaction checked.It was very positive.The nurse took measurements of > the site and put that in my records. I have had the very same reaction > every time I've been tested,(my first was in 1965) I really don't > understand why no one ever put me on treatment. I was considered to > have Latent TB.(non active) The research I've done on TB doesn't > mention reactiveation with biologics,and the biologics sites don't > mention " treated " TB.Got any ideas?Thanks,Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.