Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 , Not sure what to advise you on the IV's, perhaps someone else will have better advice there. I do have one thing for you to consider. Could you have perhaps become a " human barometer " ? Before you think I'm crazy, let me explain. I live just north of you, in Calgary, and I definitely react badly to barometric changes. I also took a bit of a downturn a couple of weeks ago and I definitely had a big setback starting last Tuesday, which sounds like about the time you did. We had a drop in temperatures a couple of weeks back, then had a major weather change here on Tuesday, going from warm, dry conditions to cold and rainy overnight (this poopy weather is still hanging in here - YUCK!). If the weather reports I heard out of Spokane are right, you also experienced a similar weather change, at least in terms of some sort of weather front moving through. So, maybe take note of changing weather conditions in your area and see if you react to them. I find whenever a front moves through here, I have more pain, stiffness, fatigue, etc. I can often forecast the start of a blizzard to within the hour of onset just by observing how my fingers start to stiffen and ache -- when they hurt right up to the tips, snow is about to start. I've even woken up at night hurting all over to discover that it's started to snow. Not much fun, except my kids seem to be entertained by my mystical talents. The barometer is pretty unstable this time of year, in fact, Dr. Brown found that September was one of the " trouble " months for rheumatic patients. While this doesn't offer much to help you feel better, just knowing that it can happen sometimes helps. Since I defintely react to barometer changes, I watch the forecasts and don't plan much when big changes are in store. If I don't react, great, but if I do, then I just try to get more rest and pray for sun. Hope you start feeling better soon and I really hope to see some sun again SOON! Hugs, a Peden Fain wrote: >...But two weeks ago, I began to get really, really tired. Then hands, wrists, arms, feet and legs began to bother me. Then the crescendo three days ago when I not only could not type or write because of the pain but could not lift anything without having to use two hands. That is how bad the pain was. This does not feel like it is in my muscles but in the bones. Cry at the drop of a hat. Now - back in May, Dr. Sininott decided to UP my five days IV's to every three months instead of every six. My herxes - and I read here that with scleraderma, herxes are not as common as with RA - usually begin anywhere from two weeks to four weeks after the five days of clindy. Four weeks ago, I finished my five days of clindys here in Montana by a local doctor who could not do the scheduled every six hours but had to do them with only four and a half hours between. That worried me. My question is, I have never, ever had problems like this before. If I sit downn for any length of time, I have a real problem getting the limbs going again. (I think I sound like your RAers) and shuffle until they are okay again. I am sort of coming out of this - at least the difficult lifting a glass of water part. I was due to have an IV (the every two weeks one now instead of monthly) Friday but passed it off until this Tuesday. If this is herx - I didn't need to add more but to back off. If this is flare - I needed to added more. So help me out here, gang. I have done so very, very well and now this set back. Really scarey here. Thanks for the help, friends. Love, > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2000 Report Share Posted September 7, 2000 Doctor Sinnott gives TWO ivs a day. One early morning and then another at least six hours later, for FIVE days. Because of the expense of my traveling from Montana to Iowa every three months since he has boosted me up to every three months from every six months, I found an elderly doctor here in Billings who is willing to do the one in between my trips to Iowa. (I hope this makes sense - as this way I have the five day iv's every six months each place) But this elderly doctor does not work long hours and the best I can do is four to five hours apart, depending on how long he will be there that particular day. Dr. Sinnott also boosted my solitary iv's from once a month to every two weeks. When I last saw Dr. Sinnott in May, he had just come from a convention and (and Earl had just passed away from scleraderma). He said even though I was coming along well, that scleraderma is just so difficult that he wanted to make sure we stay ahead of it and booted up my treatment. I think this was not a flare I went through but a herx from having these every three months instead of six. I am coming out of it slowly and each day getting better but still needing a lot of sleep. I used the ascorbid acid twice and it sure did help with the pain. I think I took too much, however, as we had 16 people here for Labor Day and a lot of that time I was locked in the bathroom. :>( But the price was worth the lessening of the pain and I will do it again if it comes back like that. Does this all make sense now? I assumed that the five day protocol meant that EVERYBODY was getting iv's twice daily on the five days. Just hope my liver does not shut down. Thank God for water and Thystlyn. Love, Adlard wrote: > > Hi , > > Sorry you're feeling so bad. > > > But two weeks ago, I began to get really, really tired. Then hands, > > wrists, arms, feet and legs began to bother me. Then the crescendo > > three days ago when I not only could not type or write because of the > > pain but could not lift anything without having to use two hands. That > > is how bad the pain was. This does not feel like it is in my muscles > > but in the bones. Cry at the drop of a hat. Now - back in May, Dr. > > Sininott decided to UP my five days IV's to every three months instead > > of every six. My herxes - and I read here that with scleraderma, herxes > > are not as common as with RA - usually begin anywhere from two weeks to > > four weeks after the five days of clindy. Four weeks ago, I finished > > my five days of clindys here in Montana by a local doctor who could not > > do the scheduled every six hours but had to do them with only four and a > > half hours between. That worried me. > > I'm confused. Dr. Sinnott wants you to have 5 days of IVs every three > months instead of every six. Nothing wrong with that and Dr. Sinnott > really knows what he's doing. > > But why is your Montana doctor giving you IVs every four and a half hours? > Or every six hours? The five day protocol is only one IV per day, 300mg > the first two days, 600mg the next two days, 900mg the last day or rest of > the week. > > No wonder you feel bad if you've had an IV every four and a half hours for > five days straight. Or have I read something incorrectly in what you said? > > Chris. > > To unsubscribe, email: rheumatic-unsubscribeegroups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2000 Report Share Posted September 7, 2000 Re Dr.Sinnott and IV's, I have a copy of the tapes from the last Road Back Foundation Physicians Conf held in Los Angeles in March.In them Dr Sinnott says he " settled on a dose which I utilize now,which is 900 mgms given twice a day for 5 days. " If anyone wants a copy of these tapes I assume they are listed on their site roadback.org Hugs, Lin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2000 Report Share Posted September 7, 2000 Hi , Sorry you're feeling so bad. > But two weeks ago, I began to get really, really tired. Then hands, > wrists, arms, feet and legs began to bother me. Then the crescendo > three days ago when I not only could not type or write because of the > pain but could not lift anything without having to use two hands. That > is how bad the pain was. This does not feel like it is in my muscles > but in the bones. Cry at the drop of a hat. Now - back in May, Dr. > Sininott decided to UP my five days IV's to every three months instead > of every six. My herxes - and I read here that with scleraderma, herxes > are not as common as with RA - usually begin anywhere from two weeks to > four weeks after the five days of clindy. Four weeks ago, I finished > my five days of clindys here in Montana by a local doctor who could not > do the scheduled every six hours but had to do them with only four and a > half hours between. That worried me. I'm confused. Dr. Sinnott wants you to have 5 days of IVs every three months instead of every six. Nothing wrong with that and Dr. Sinnott really knows what he's doing. But why is your Montana doctor giving you IVs every four and a half hours? Or every six hours? The five day protocol is only one IV per day, 300mg the first two days, 600mg the next two days, 900mg the last day or rest of the week. No wonder you feel bad if you've had an IV every four and a half hours for five days straight. Or have I read something incorrectly in what you said? Chris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2000 Report Share Posted September 8, 2000 Hi , On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Fain wrote: > think this was not a flare I went through but a herx from having these every > three months instead of six. I am coming out of it slowly and each day I'm sure you're right - that sure is a lot of clindamycin. Hope you cope with it OK and soon feel better. Chris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Hi Heidi. I agree - this disease does suck! I personally believe that honesty is the best policy and if this " dream job " really wants you to work with them, they will understand and work with your RA, too. I wish I was well enough to go back to work ........Doreen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Heidi and group I isn't it your buisness if your out on STD. What exactly is STD. Is it what I think it is. Clora Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Clora, STD is short term disability. This could effect how an employer looks at someone applying for a job. This could also effect pre-existing conditions for insurance. Some insurance companies will not cover you on what was existing before you joined a group insurance at work, or private coverage. Shirley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Heidi The other company did not need to be informed but it is professional courtsey to tell them. You also should of had the option for them to contact your current employer or not STD is usually paid by and insurance and not actually by the company. They are just the holder of the policy. Heidi M On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:06 AM, CLORA <clora4jesus@...> wrote: > Heidi and group > I isn't it your buisness if your out on STD. What exactly is STD. Is > it what I think it is. > Clora > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.