Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Nice Try Marcus, The real reason the Aussies did relatively well is because it was the host country. It's true the Americans are not nearly as good as they think they are. But come to Canada and find out how well the Aussies fair! (Goldrushless in Canada) ---------- From: Marcus Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:42 AM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF POPULATION: USA - approx. 280,000,000. AUS - 19,000,000. MEDAL TALLY USA - 39-25-33-97 AUS - 16-25-17-58 USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people AUS - one medal for every 327,600 WINNER USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people WINNER USA - The economy of a small country spent on every competing athlete AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit invested by the athlete USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals ....... 2.23 times overperformed AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won ........ 854 medals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF POPULATION: USA - approx. 280,000,000. AUS - 19,000,000. ............................................................................. ............. obviously we are surrounded by more women then you!!!!!!! winner......jimm..er...u.s.a. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF POPULATION: USA - approx. 280,000,000. AUS - 19,000,000. ............................................................................. ............. obviously we are surrounded by more women then you!!!!!!! winner......jimm..er...u.s.a. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF POPULATION: USA - approx. 280,000,000. AUS - 19,000,000. ............................................................................. ............. obviously we are surrounded by more women then you!!!!!!! winner......jimm..er...u.s.a. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Marcus, .... jealousy is an ugly virtue. Face it- Our drug-induced sex fiends did better than your drug-induced sex fiends. --- Fusca wrote: > Nice Try Marcus, > > The real reason the Aussies did relatively well is > because it was the host country. It's true the > Americans are not nearly as good as they think they > are. But come to Canada and find out how well the > Aussies fair! > > (Goldrushless in Canada) > > ---------- > From: Marcus > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:42 AM > To: NF2_Crewegroups > Subject: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > POPULATION: > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > AUS - 19,000,000. > > MEDAL TALLY > USA - 39-25-33-97 > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > WINNER > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > WINNER > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > competing athlete > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > invested by the athlete > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Marcus, .... jealousy is an ugly virtue. Face it- Our drug-induced sex fiends did better than your drug-induced sex fiends. --- Fusca wrote: > Nice Try Marcus, > > The real reason the Aussies did relatively well is > because it was the host country. It's true the > Americans are not nearly as good as they think they > are. But come to Canada and find out how well the > Aussies fair! > > (Goldrushless in Canada) > > ---------- > From: Marcus > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:42 AM > To: NF2_Crewegroups > Subject: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > POPULATION: > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > AUS - 19,000,000. > > MEDAL TALLY > USA - 39-25-33-97 > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > WINNER > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > WINNER > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > competing athlete > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > invested by the athlete > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Hey , Only Marcus is jealous. As for me, I always root for the Italians. They may not win but they are the most fun to watch! (Italian in Canada) ---------- From: and Christi Waldrip Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 5:16 AM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: Re: FW: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF Marcus, .... jealousy is an ugly virtue. Face it- Our drug-induced sex fiends did better than your drug-induced sex fiends. --- Fusca wrote: > Nice Try Marcus, > > The real reason the Aussies did relatively well is > because it was the host country. It's true the > Americans are not nearly as good as they think they > are. But come to Canada and find out how well the > Aussies fair! > > (Goldrushless in Canada) > > ---------- > From: Marcus > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:42 AM > To: NF2_Crewegroups > Subject: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > POPULATION: > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > AUS - 19,000,000. > > MEDAL TALLY > USA - 39-25-33-97 > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > WINNER > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > WINNER > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > competing athlete > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > invested by the athlete > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Hey , Only Marcus is jealous. As for me, I always root for the Italians. They may not win but they are the most fun to watch! (Italian in Canada) ---------- From: and Christi Waldrip Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 5:16 AM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: Re: FW: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF Marcus, .... jealousy is an ugly virtue. Face it- Our drug-induced sex fiends did better than your drug-induced sex fiends. --- Fusca wrote: > Nice Try Marcus, > > The real reason the Aussies did relatively well is > because it was the host country. It's true the > Americans are not nearly as good as they think they > are. But come to Canada and find out how well the > Aussies fair! > > (Goldrushless in Canada) > > ---------- > From: Marcus > Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 6:42 AM > To: NF2_Crewegroups > Subject: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > POPULATION: > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > AUS - 19,000,000. > > MEDAL TALLY > USA - 39-25-33-97 > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > WINNER > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > WINNER > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > competing athlete > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > invested by the athlete > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Jealousy ?? Hmm, what did they say about the US track and field wankers when they won gold ?? Even the head boss of the US camp said they were a, quoting Aussie motor sport legend Jim s, " A pack of arseholes! " Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > > > > POPULATION: > > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > > AUS - 19,000,000. > > > > MEDAL TALLY > > USA - 39-25-33-97 > > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > > WINNER > > > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > > WINNER > > > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > > competing athlete > > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > > invested by the athlete > > > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Jealousy ?? Hmm, what did they say about the US track and field wankers when they won gold ?? Even the head boss of the US camp said they were a, quoting Aussie motor sport legend Jim s, " A pack of arseholes! " Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > > > > POPULATION: > > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > > AUS - 19,000,000. > > > > MEDAL TALLY > > USA - 39-25-33-97 > > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > > WINNER > > > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > > WINNER > > > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > > competing athlete > > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > > invested by the athlete > > > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Jealousy ?? Hmm, what did they say about the US track and field wankers when they won gold ?? Even the head boss of the US camp said they were a, quoting Aussie motor sport legend Jim s, " A pack of arseholes! " Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > > > > POPULATION: > > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > > AUS - 19,000,000. > > > > MEDAL TALLY > > USA - 39-25-33-97 > > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > > WINNER > > > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > > WINNER > > > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > > competing athlete > > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > > invested by the athlete > > > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Especially when they play soccer. There is more acting when they play than a soap opera !! Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > > > > POPULATION: > > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > > AUS - 19,000,000. > > > > MEDAL TALLY > > USA - 39-25-33-97 > > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > > WINNER > > > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > > WINNER > > > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > > competing athlete > > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > > invested by the athlete > > > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2000 Report Share Posted November 5, 2000 Especially when they play soccer. There is more acting when they play than a soap opera !! Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > > > > POPULATION: > > USA - approx. 280,000,000. > > AUS - 19,000,000. > > > > MEDAL TALLY > > USA - 39-25-33-97 > > AUS - 16-25-17-58 > > > > USA - one medal for every 2,886,600 people > > AUS - one medal for every 327,600 > > WINNER > > > > USA - one GOLD medal for every 7,179,500 people > > AUS - one GOLD medal for every 1,187,500 people > > WINNER > > > > USA - The economy of a small country spent on every > > competing athlete > > AUS - A few miserable crumbs spent by the government > > and whole truckloads of dedication and spirit > > invested by the athlete > > > > USA - 4.67% of world population. 10.43% of medals > > ....... 2.23 times overperformed > > AUS - 0.32% of world population. 6.24% of medals > > ....... 19.50 times overperformed WINNER > > > > The USA, based on population, to win the equivalent > > medals as mighty AUSTRALIA, would have to have won > > ........ 854 medals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2000 Report Share Posted November 6, 2000 Adam, This adds a little drama to the game. Also, Toronto is making a major bid to host a future Olympic games (I forget which year). It's very unlikely you Aussies would do as well here (will the judges slanted and bribed in our favour!). Toronto should have hosted the Atlanta Olympics but the Yanks have deep pockets and wanted it on their turf. ---------- From: Adam Murdey Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:35 AM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: Re: FW: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF Especially when they play soccer. There is more acting when they play than a soap opera !! Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2000 Report Share Posted November 6, 2000 Adam, This adds a little drama to the game. Also, Toronto is making a major bid to host a future Olympic games (I forget which year). It's very unlikely you Aussies would do as well here (will the judges slanted and bribed in our favour!). Toronto should have hosted the Atlanta Olympics but the Yanks have deep pockets and wanted it on their turf. ---------- From: Adam Murdey Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:35 AM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: Re: FW: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF Especially when they play soccer. There is more acting when they play than a soap opera !! Adam ajmurdey@... http://www.rtw.com.au/adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2000 Report Share Posted November 7, 2000 Soap?? He needs to learn more about Canadians. We are a neutral bunch!! ---------- From: pbrud85 Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 7:08 PM To: NF2_Crewegroups Subject: Re: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF hummm. I think that Jeff needs some soap whatcha think? Bruder Re: AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE NON NF > > > In a message dated 11/06/2000 7:09:15 AM Eastern Standard Time, > jeffwurst@... writes: > > << Adam is a FIGJAM > > Jeff > >> > > Hey Jeff, what in the world is a FIGJAM? Is that an Aussie term for > something nasty? > > June > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.