Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Ann Rheum Dis. Published Online First: 12 August 2008. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.094151 Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extended Report Rheumatoid arthritis versus diabetes as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a cross sectional study. The CARRÉ Investigation V P van Halm 1, M JL s 1, A E Voskuyl 1, M Boers 2, W F lems 3, M Visser 1, C DA Stehouwer 4, A MW Spijkerman 1, J M Dekker 1, G Nijpels 1, R J Heine 1, L M Bouter 1, Y M Smulders 1, B AC Dijkmans 1 and M T Nurmohamed 2* 1 VU University Medical Center, Netherlands 2 VUMC, Netherlands 3 Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum, Netherlands 4 University Hospital Maastricht, Netherlands Abstract objectives: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased cardiovascular risk, but the magnitude of this risk is not precisely known. We therefore investigated the associations between RA and type 2 diabetes (DM2), a well-established cardiovascular risk factor, on the one hand and cardiovascular disease (CVD) on the other. Methods: We determined the prevalences of CVD, (i.e. coronary, cerebral and peripheral arterial disease), in 353 randomly selected outpatients with RA (diagnosed between 1989 and 2001, aged between 50 and 75 years; the CARRÉ study), and in participants of a population-based cohort study on diabetes and CVD (the Hoorn study). RA patients with normal fasting glucose levels from the CARRÉ study (RA, n = 294) were compared to individuals from the Hoorn study with a normal glucose metabolism (non-diabetic, n = 258), and individuals with DM2 (DM2, n = 194). Results: The prevalence of CVD was 5.0% (95%-CI: 2.3-7.7%) in non-diabetic, 12.4% (95%-CI: 7.5-17.3%) in DM2, and 12.9% (95%-CI: 8.8-17.0%) in RA individuals. With non-diabetic individuals as reference category, the age- and gender-adjusted prevalence odds ratio (ORs) for CVD was 2.3 (95%-CI: 1.1-4.7) for individuals with DM2 and 3.1 (95%-CI: 1.6-6.1) for RA patients. There was an attenuation of the prevalences after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (ORs: 2.0 (95%-CI: 0.9-4.5) and 2.7 (95%-CI: 1.2-5.9), respectively). Conclusions: The prevalence of CVD in RA is increased to an extent that is at least comparable to that of DM2. This should have implications for primary cardiovascular prevention strategies in RA. http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/ard.2008.094151v2?papetoc -- Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 And several of us are so lucky that we have both RA and DM2, LOL, so we get double the risk. Sue On Saturday, August 16, 2008, at 09:29 AM, wrote: > Conclusions: The prevalence of CVD in RA is increased to an extent > that is at least comparable to that of DM2. This should have > implications for primary cardiovascular prevention strategies in RA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 I hear you.... I have RA, my mother and her sister and alll her family had Adult-onset Diabetes. I'm waiting.... though trying not to get it! >From: Sue <marysue@...> >Reply- > >Subject: Re: [ ] RESEARCH - RA versus diabetes as a risk factor >for cardiovascular disease: CARRE >Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:10:53 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Originating-IP: 71.74.56.124 >X-Sender: marysue@... >Received: from n50c.bullet.mail.sp1. ([66.163.168.184]) by >bay0-mc4-f5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sat, 16 >Aug 2008 10:03:59 -0700 >Received: from [216.252.122.218] by n50.bullet.mail.sp1. with >NNFMP; 16 Aug 2008 17:03:59 -0000 >Received: from [66.218.69.3] by t3.bullet.sp1. with NNFMP; 16 Aug >2008 17:03:59 -0000 >Received: from [66.218.67.114] by t3.bullet.scd. with NNFMP; 16 >Aug 2008 17:03:59 -0000 >X-Message-Delivery: Vj0zLjQuMDt1cz0wO2w9MDthPTA= >X-Message-Info: >R00BdL5giqqGP4p/xzC4qhg8DmEeFMFybIXhTcg4g/7EfE5eB+xAWbn+l7m7N6LXSNxs6R/0stE5izi\ 6kn+tG62I782jQ6Tf >Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam./domainkeys >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; >d=;b=ctqwPYPka1LJvR+MICCBGaPCSvDwU6dsDkJbZYMqVDrNDDGF4CSG+u3fAgQ\ PQaONGIZ/rIt6PcpPlHLdmJUt5QK8x9W+HhulGzoagJN87+FS2QEZ/iFw1S01T6kSr4hA; >X--Newman-Id: 101478-m117121 >X-Apparently- >X-Received: (qmail 36805 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2008 17:03:56 -0000 >X-Received: from unknown (66.218.67.96) by m46.grp.scd. with >QMQP; 16 Aug 2008 17:03:56 -0000 >X-Received: from unknown (HELO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (71.74.56.124) >by mta17.grp.scd. with SMTP; 16 Aug 2008 17:03:56 -0000 >X-Received: from triad.rr.com ([98.26.250.114]) by >hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id ><20080816170356.ZZM2273.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@...> >for < >; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:03:56 +0000 >X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) >X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0:0 >X--Profile: splaster27239 >Mailing-List: list ; contact > -owner >Delivered-mailing list >List-Id: < .> >Precedence: bulk >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto: -unsubscribe > >X--Newman-Property: groups-email-ff-m >Return-Path: >sentto-101478-117121-1218906238-bennion8=msn.com@... >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2008 17:03:59.0927 (UTC) >FILETIME=[13B29C70:01C8FFC2] > >And several of us are so lucky that we have both RA and DM2, LOL, so we >get double the risk. > >Sue > >On Saturday, August 16, 2008, at 09:29 AM, wrote: > > > Conclusions: The prevalence of CVD in RA is increased to an extent > > that is at least comparable to that of DM2. This should have > > implications for primary cardiovascular prevention strategies in RA. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 It's probably not double the risk, Sue. Still, lucky you! Not an MD On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Sue <marysue@...> wrote: > And several of us are so lucky that we have both RA and DM2, LOL, so we > get double the risk. > > Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 I wish I could be that lucky in lotteries, etc. LOL. Sue On Saturday, August 16, 2008, at 03:18 PM, wrote: > It's probably not double the risk, Sue. > > Still, lucky you! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.