Guest guest Posted October 17, 2008 Report Share Posted October 17, 2008 Rheumatology Advance Access published online on October 16, 2008 Rheumatology, doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ken314 Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: correlation between neurological manifestations and magnetic resonance imaging findings J. A. Narváez1,*, J. Narváez2,*, M. Serrallonga3, E. De Lama1, M. de Albert1, R. Mast1 and J. M. Nolla2 1Department of Radiology 2Department of Rheumatology, Bellvitge-IDIBELL, University Hospital and 3Institute of Diagnostic Imaging (IDI), Bellvitge Centre, Barcelona, Spain. Abstract Objective. To evaluate the correlation between neurological deficits indicative of compressive myelopathy and MRI findings in a series of patients with RA and symptomatic involvement of the cervical spine. Methods. Forty-one consecutive patients with RA were studied using cervical spine MRI. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to identify MRI parameters of cervical spine involvement associated with the development of neurological dysfunction. Results. The mean age of the 41 patients (33 women and 8 men) was 59 yrs (range 23–82 yrs), while the median disease duration was 18 ± 9 yrs (range 4–40 yrs). According to Ranawat's classification, 17 (42%) patients were in Class I, 21 (51%) in Class II and 3 (7%) in Class III. Thus, patients with clinical manifestations of compressive myelopathy (Ranawat's Class II + III) represented 58% (24/41) of all cases. Among the different MRI parameters of cervical spine involvement analysed, only the presence of atlantoaxial spinal canal stenosis [odds ratio (OR) 4.55; 95% CI 1.14–18.15], atlantoaxial cervical cord compression (OR 9.6; 95% CI 1.08–85.16) and subaxial myelopathy changes (OR 11.43; 95% CI 1.3–100.81) were associated with a significantly increased risk for neurological dysfunction (Ranawat's Class II or III). Conclusion. In RA patients with symptomatic cervical spine involvement, there is a strong correlation between the development of neurological dysfunction and MRI identification of atlantoaxial spinal canal stenosis, especially in those cases with evidence of upper cervical cord or brainstem compression and subaxial myelopathy changes. http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/ken314v1?papetoc Not an MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.