Guest guest Posted March 22, 2007 Report Share Posted March 22, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: The dilemma of circumcision for Hindus. Absolutely... The dilemma will be profound in the minds of all the parents to think abt this eventuality as the guiding prinicple for circumcising their newly born sons and i amnot even talking abt the religious dilemma which to me is irrelevent if it ever was!. For me it is yet another case of transplanting the ethos and findings of foreign study into indian shores with out looking in to the social implications of it. I still believe that the authors of such reports would not be wanting the public health officials in the developing world to lap it up with giving a thought into the practical difficulties. Dr Sreejit E M 67,Pearson road Ipswich,IP3 8 NL UK Ph:+44-1473-437837 mob:+44-7722015047 e-mail: <emsree@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2007 Report Share Posted March 22, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/7051 I think Dr. Gupta raised some very important issues that ought to be considered before launching a mass circumcision campaign anywhere. In a recently published article, my colleagues and I reported that circumcised male and female virgins and adolescents in Kenya, Lesotho, and Tanzania are _more_ likely to be infected with HIV than their uncircumcised counterparts. There are widespread observations of unhygienic circumcision practices in sub-Saharan Africa, and the available evidence suggests that HIV transmission may occur through circumcision-related blood exposures. Clinical settings there are also plagued by poor infection control, so medical circumcision may not be any guarantee for hygienic care. This article is available on request from http://www.interscientific.net/AOE2007.html. We found, as have many others, that circumcised adults (both men and women) were less likely to be HIV infected than uncircumcised adults. This difference in the direction of the relationship (circumcised more likely to be infected among adolescents, circumcised less likely to be infected among adults) may be due to circumcision-related HIV mortality (that is, most persons infected during circumcision in adolescence dying before reaching middle to late adulthood). The circumcision trials that you mentioned consistently demonstrated substantial reductions in genital symptoms following circumcision. As a result, circumcised men may also be less likely to seek treatment for genital symptoms and consequently receive fewer blood exposures to HIV from unhygienic care (such as with unsterilized, reused syringes). The three trials demonstrated that circumcision in presumably sterile conditions decreased the rate at which men acquired HIV. However, the mechanism of this effect is unclear. The trial investigators have argued that the effect is due to physiology. The most frequently cited physiologic mechanism is the elimination of foreskin with its dense population of Langerhans cells. These cells have been thought to be especially vulnerable to HIV infection, but research published two weeks ago showed that these cells actually produce a protein that strongly _protects against_ HIV infection (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Retrieve & dopt=Abstra\ ctPlus & list_uids=17334373 & query_hl=2 & itool=pubmed_docsum). Altogether, the findings I've mentioned here call into question the physiologic basis of the effect observed in the trial. It remains for further research to identify the mechanism, but some other possibilities might be reduced exposure to unhygienic formal or informal medical care (as a result of reduced genital symptoms) and changes in sexual repertoire after circumcision (perhaps shifting from anal sex to vaginal sex; types of sex apparently not measured in the trials). The uncertainties about circumcision also highlight the broader issue of nonsexual transmission of HIV. You have nicely outlined several aspects of such transmission on one of your web pages (http://t8web.lanl.gov/people/rajan/AIDS-india/MYWORK/blood.6.00.html). Mariette Correa and Gisselquist, contributors to this list, have also published a number of informative articles and reports on this dimension of the epidemic in India (see, for example, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Retrieve & dopt=Abstra\ ctPlus & list_uids=17062177 & query_hl=4 & itool=pubmed_docsum). Devon Brewer e-mail: interscientific@... www.interscientific.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.