Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 On 9/5/06, Dena <denaturner@...> wrote: > Anyone who cites Barrett (notice my intentional omission of M.D. and Dr.) as a credible source...well, he/she simply belongs in the lower ranks with Barrett, in my book. What I thought was funny is that they referred to him as " the respected Dr. Barrett, " as if he was in some position of prestige and honor rather than being the operator of a sensationalist web site with an ideologically specific readership. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Barrett is largely a joke, in my book. I emailed him years ago when I took issue with his criticisms of acupuncture. The acupuncture meridians have been clearly mapped using measures of skin conductivity and electromagnetic field activity. They are simply a fact, on the energy level. He didn't know this, and made a fool of himself with his publicly-posted reply. Without my permission, he posted my email on his webpage along with a reply that did not address the question I raised. mike > > > Anyone who cites Barrett (notice my intentional omission of M.D. and Dr.) as a credible source...well, he/she simply belongs in the lower ranks with Barrett, in my book. > > What I thought was funny is that they referred to him as " the > respected Dr. Barrett, " as if he was in some position of > prestige and honor rather than being the operator of a sensationalist > web site with an ideologically specific readership. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.