Guest guest Posted May 31, 2007 Report Share Posted May 31, 2007 Dear FORUM, Re: /message/7330 A personal reaction to the news article: I really do not understand this sudden ‘alarm’ in the health officials regarding prevalence rates in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh as if it has come as a big surprise. The epidemic in Bihar was always threatening to spin out of control. The vulnerability factors were always known, the socio-political situation was a given. The issue is there was always a lack of will and drive at all levels to push and persist against these odds. The national AIDS programming and the donor funding has always been skewed towards high prevalence regions. The special will and attention required in keeping a low prevalence state where it is, when one is up against a prevalent low risk perception, has no where been near the levels required. It takes a lot of advocacy, time, energy, persistence to get a point across in these states. It can be extremely frustrating and de-motivating at times for persons working in these states. But there is no option but to persist. It is not enough to say that migrants are coming back infected from Surat, Mumbai etc, the issue is what has been done to inform and equip these vast numbers of predominantly male population before they migrate out. It will probably take more effort to keep a low prevalence state low than reverting the epidemic in high prevalence states. Vandana Nair e-mail: <nair_vandana@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.