Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 What exactly do you mean since dogs do not eat fish??? As one that grew up in Alaska, & has also lived in Norway, I first hand know for a FACT that fish have been a staple of the canine diet for eons in northern hemisphere climes around the world. To this very day fish are still dried & put up to be fed to the dogs over the winter as their primary source of calories. And loose dogs will do their own fishing in the rivers/streams. (Rather an amusing sight.) Have you ever been to the south seas? Dogs abandoned upon the more out of the way islands, by yachters & the sort, also gladly eat fish & what ever else they can. On a couple of these islands catching fish & crabs is pretty well all there is-period! It is called survival. In the 80's I also lived in Afrika & can assure you dogs there too ate fish! Dogs can & will eat whatever they can, especially when left to their own accord for meals. Your statement highly reminds me of the pronouncement by an American doctor, on a horse message board last winter, stating that horses do not naturally eat papayas. She obviously had never spent time in the Second or Third World! Even the well taken care of horses would wander to the papaya tree if given the opportunity to. (BTW, yes, I have seen dogs eat papaya too. Of their own free will, eating the fruit dropped from trees.) *back to lurkdom for me* VACHE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 On 9/27/06, vache920 <vache920@...> wrote: > What exactly do you mean since dogs do not eat fish??? Well I certainly didn't mean dogs *won't* eat fish. I think what I had in mind is that the evolutionary diet of a dog is not fish-based. Maybe I'm wrong. I guess the relevant question is -- do wolves eat fish? And as I ask, I realize that I don't know whether or not wolves eat fish. My thought was that there is no reason a dog should have a very high need for PUFA and low need for vitamin A unless they are obligate fish eaters and they are perhaps leaving behind the livers. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 On 9/27/06, Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > On 9/27/06, vache920 <vache920@...> wrote: > > > What exactly do you mean since dogs do not eat fish??? > > > I realize that I don't know whether or not wolves > > eat fish. Chris Hi, Chris... Not only fish, but also berries, and grasshoppers according to a site my 10-yo was looking at the other day. http://www.wolfweb.com/diet.html Speaking of wolves, they've " recovered " in their populations so incredibly well in Montana, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming, that US Fish & Wildlife wants to declassify them from " endangered " . It's being held up by a Wyoming law that lists wolves as a " predator " , allowing them to be hunted anytime, anywhere, without limit. http://www.fws.gov/news/NewsReleases/showNews.cfm?newsId=2B76CC08-65BF-03E7-2F39\ DB75431B7319 Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 My dogs and cats relish a nice juicy grasshopper. Bit of trivia; in many parts of the world people eat them as well, do you know they turn pink when cooked, like shrimp? Evidently the taste isn't as good, though. I've been half tempted to get the kids to catch one so I can cook it just to see it turn pink, but that's still kind of gross! > > > > What exactly do you mean since dogs do not eat fish??? > > > > > I realize that I don't know whether or not wolves > > > eat fish. Chris > > Hi, Chris... > Not only fish, but also berries, and grasshoppers according to a site my > 10-yo was looking at the other day. http://www.wolfweb.com/diet.html > Speaking of wolves, they've " recovered " in their populations so incredibly > well in Montana, Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming, that US Fish & Wildlife wants to > declassify them from " endangered " . It's being held up by a Wyoming law that > lists wolves as a " predator " , allowing them to be hunted anytime, anywhere, > without limit. > http://www.fws.gov/news/NewsReleases/showNews.cfm?newsId=2B76CC08- 65BF-03E7-2F39DB75431B7319 > Sharon > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 >On 9/27/06, vache920 <vache920@...> wrote: >> What exactly do you mean since dogs do not eat fish??? > >Well I certainly didn't mean dogs *won't* eat fish. I think what I >had in mind is that the evolutionary diet of a dog is not fish-based. >Maybe I'm wrong. I guess the relevant question is -- do wolves eat >fish? And as I ask, I realize that I don't know whether or not wolves >eat fish. To pinpoint it even further, the question is, do *gray* wolves eat fish, since dogs are domesticated *gray* wolves. Some wolves do eat fish as someone else posted, but the diet of the gray wolf is typically large ungulates (deer, elk, moose, etc.) with a lesser percent being beaver. They occassionally catch a hare. This was their preferred evolutionaly diet, AFAIk. Having said that, it's not known how long dogs have been domesticated, with guestimates ranging between 10,000 and 100,000 ya, so, if some coastal dwellers domesticated wovles 100,000 ya, it seems plausible that some breeds might be adapted to a high fish diet. Not sure if that means they'd do well on it outside the context of an arctic enviroment, or if that even makes a difference. In regards to Lana's dog, it's moot since she's got a terrier, bred to hunt rats, I believe. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 ABSOLUTELY wolves eat fish!!! Not only when the salmon are very easy pickings during the spawning season, but they will also hunt other type fish in streams too during other times of the year! VACHE Maybe I'm wrong. I guess the relevant question is -- do wolves eat fish? And as I ask, I realize that I don't know whether or not wolves eat fish. > Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Sharon's child is quite correct with what they found on the web. Wolves, foxes & coyotes do regulary eat (when available) fish, berries, insects, herbs... I live on a race horse farm in Florida now, & when looking at the fox 'droppings' (scat) it is quite easy to see they have been eating things containing a lot of seeds. Appears to be blackberries to me. Ever have a fish pond? It is not just the racoons, storks & herons that raid it. The foxes & coyotes do too. Sorry, no wolves directly in this area, though I am sure they would partake of an easy meal if they had safe oppoutunity too. VACHE --- In , " Sharon son " Not only fish, but also berries, and grasshoppers according to a site my 10-yo was looking at the other day. http://www.wolfweb.com/diet.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I beg to differ with you, in that during the months of salmon spawning any wolves within access of spawning streams will gorge upon the salmon. The spawn takes place at the PERFECT time for the cycle of nature, with the abundance of fish & high fat of the salmon immensely helping to build up the very necessary extra winter stores of fat upon wolves, bears, badgers, wolverines, & also assorted birds... 'Coastal' has nothing to do with this at all & neither does Arctic. Salmon run literal hundreds of miles up rivers to spawning streams. Take a look at the Yukon River as an example. Do you think the wolves of the Columbia River basin in in the Pacific North West totally ignored easy food in the form of salmon? Do you think they never fished for trout? Back when Indiana still had wolves at large, do you think they too ignored fish in streams, along with crawdads? And why would any of this be limited to grey wolves? I think it would be quite safe to say the red wolves of Florida, in their day, regularly hunted streams for fish. VACHE Some wolves do eat fish as someone else posted, but the diet of the gray wolf is typically large ungulates (deer, elk, moose, etc.) with a lesser percent being beaver. They occassionally catch a hare. This was their preferred evolutionaly diet, AFAIk. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 Ugh, top posting. To make this easier to follow, I removed my original quote from the bottom and posted it to the top so everything's chronological. > Some wolves do eat fish as someone else >posted, but the diet of the gray wolf is typically large ungulates >(deer, elk, moose, etc.) with a lesser percent being beaver. They >occassionally catch a hare. This was their preferred evolutionaly >diet, AFAIk. > >Suze >I beg to differ with you, in that during the months of salmon >spawning any wolves within access of spawning streams will gorge >upon the salmon. The spawn takes place at the PERFECT time for the >cycle of nature, with the abundance of fish & high fat of the salmon >immensely helping to build up the very necessary extra winter stores >of fat upon wolves, bears, badgers, wolverines, & also assorted >birds... Do you happen to know by systematic observation, what *grey* wolves eat over the course of time in the wild in areas where there is no, or limited, human encroachment, or you are guessing based on what you know of the habits of other subspecies of wolves? My information about the dietary habits of wolves (which I should've qualified in my previous post) comes from Mech, who is probably the most respected wolf biologist in the world and has studied wolves for over well over 20 years and has probably published more about their behavior and ecology than any other human being. (see his extensive biography here: http://www.davemech.org/biography.html) I don't meant o appeal to authority in stating this, but rather to provide a citation from a source with extensive experience with and knowledge of the habits of wild wolves. In one of his books on wovles titled " The Wolf: Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species " he writes in the section " Prey Species " : " It seems logical that the wolf would prey mainly on large animals, because of its size, its habit of traveling in packs, and its ability to consume and digest great quantities of food in short periods. Predators that feed consistetly on small animals usually are much smaller, and they hunt alone. Many studies of wolf food habits support this conclusion. In the seven most complete investigations of the contents of large numbers of wolf droppings, animals the size of beaver or larger composed from 59 to 96% of the food items (Table 19). In all but one of these studies, animals larger than beavers comprised from 59 to 88% of the items. The prey most represented were: white-tailed deer, mule deer, moose, caribou, elk, Dall sheep, bighorn sheep, and beaver. " (pp. 172-73). There is no mention of salmon or any other fish as far as I remember or saw in re-scanning this information now. This does not mean I'm arguing that grey wolves or any other wolves don't eat salmon or other fish, it only means that the evidence so far shows that large ungulates make up the majority of the prey species, which is what I stated in the email you begged to differ from. Since gray wolves are the largest wolf species (or one of the largest) it's reasonable to deduce that they especially relied on large prey as they are built to hunt such prey. And as Mech said, their social order is built around large prey hunting - they hunt in packs. Typically, predators who rely on small game as a foundation of their diet do not hunt or live in packs. That, coupled with the information that their scat most often contains remains of large ungulate, argues against fish being a significant source of calories in the dog's ancestral diet. Again, this is not to say that wolves never eat fish or that they didn't take advantage of salmon runs, but it suggests that, unless any given dog belongs to a very ancient breed that had fish as a foundation of their diet, that perhaps Lana should consider giving her Jack Terrier the high vitamin CLO as opposed to the high PUFA CLO (relative to vitamin content). >'Coastal' has nothing to do with this at all & neither does Arctic. >Salmon run literal hundreds of miles up rivers to spawning streams. >Take a look at the Yukon River as an example. Do you think the >wolves of the Columbia River basin in in the Pacific North West >totally ignored easy food in the form of salmon? Do you think they >never fished for trout? Back when Indiana still had wolves at >large, do you think they too ignored fish in streams, along with >crawdads? How long is the salmon run? One month? Longer? Unlike this seasonal food, caribou were available year round to arctic wolves. > >And why would any of this be limited to grey wolves? I think it >would be quite safe to say the red wolves of Florida, in their day, >regularly hunted streams for fish. Our discussion was limited to grey wolves because that's the species dogs belong to. Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2006 Report Share Posted September 29, 2006 YES SUZE AS A MATTER OF FACT, YES, I DO, from systematic observation. My (real, not nick) name can be found in AK F & W publications, thank you very much. As for as no or limited human encroachment, you ARE kidding right?! Just where on Earth do you propose such a mythical place to exist? No need to bother to reply, for as said, I am bored with this, & simply shan't be reading. Oh, & no I did NOT miss your point. I simply abhored the broadbrushed statement I orignally replied to. VACHE Do you happen to know by systematic observation, what *grey* wolves eat over the course of time in the wild in areas where there is no, or limited, human encroachment, or you are guessing based on what you know of the habits of other subspecies of wolves? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2006 Report Share Posted September 30, 2006 > >YES SUZE AS A MATTER OF FACT, YES, I DO, from systematic observation. >My (real, not nick) name can be found in AK F & W publications, thank >you very much. Well that's really swell, but it doesn't further our knowledge of the subject of whether or not dogs/grey wolves have eaten fish in significant enough quantities and for long enough to have developed either a need for a higher PUFA amount than a red meat based diet would provide or whether they have adequate defenses against the negative consequences of consuming too much PUFA, since you haven't provided your real name or the citation or the relevant info in the publication you allude to. As for as no or limited human encroachment, you ARE >kidding right?! Just where on Earth do you propose such a mythical >place to exist? You apparently missed my point, because that WAS my point. If you've observed *grey* wolves any time recently, as you suggest you have. it is very unlikely to be in a place where human encroachment hasn't affected their dietary choices, which affects its relevance as to what prey species wolves have evolved on. Having said that, Mech did indeed observe wolves in a very remote area of the planet without human inhabitants over a ten year period - namely the arctic wolf of the high Arctic. They had only four prey species available according to Mech in " The Arctic Wolf: Ten Years with the Pack " , and none of them were fish, even though they were surrounded by water. Rather he names musk oxen as the wolves primary prey, and the other prey available were caribou, arctic hare, and lemmings. IIRC, the wolves also hunted the caribou and hare. Also, arctic wolves, like dogs, are a subspecies of grey wolves, as you probably know. No need to bother to reply, for as said, I am bored >with this, & simply shan't be reading. Alternatively, you could just put your hands over your ears and go " LALALALALALA " . Suze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.