Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 At 02:00 PM 10/5/06 -0400, you wrote: >Good nutrition will never kill you sooner. I do believe I just found a new sig line. MFJ Any moment in which you feel like dancing is a perfect moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 On 10/6/06, jkollingnl <innergy111@...> wrote: > 'Early Europeans' didn't live a lot over 25 years of age untill quite > 'recently', that is say not more than a few hundred years ago. > I suspect it may be similar at various places, or at least for some > periods, at some times. Based on what evidence? When these " life expectancies " are calculated, they average in the infant mortality. It is an utterly useless and obfuscatory way to calculate a life expectancy. It's no wonder we have such little regard for our elderly in modern society. After all, we've only spent 2-300 years figuring out what to do with this curiously novel phenomenon. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 , > > Early Hebrews lived many hundreds of years, if you believe their > historical record. > Where can one find that bit of info? > I would be quite interested in reading it. Genesis. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 Here here On Oct 6, 2006, at 1:08 PM, jkollingnl wrote: > not-so-bad old Greeks, Greek > philosophers. > Parashis artpages@... zine: artpagesonline.com portfolio: http://www.artpagesonline.com/EPportfolio/000portfolio.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 I didn't know that. Good point. On Oct 6, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Masterjohn wrote: > When these " life expectancies " are calculated, they average in the > infant mortality. It is an utterly useless and obfuscatory way to > calculate a life expectancy. > Parashis artpages@... zine: artpagesonline.com portfolio: http://www.artpagesonline.com/EPportfolio/000portfolio.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2006 Report Share Posted October 7, 2006 I would like to see that too. On Oct 7, 2006, at 2:52 AM, bellasol.organics wrote: > I would love to see a study on what I believe is true life > expectatancy: how many people who lived to be 45 or 50 continued on > to closer to 100. I think our " life expectatancy " stats would be > very different when we eliminate the infant deaths, young deaths, > accidents-related deaths, epidemics, and starvation. Parashis artpages@... zine: artpagesonline.com portfolio: http://www.artpagesonline.com/EPportfolio/000portfolio.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.